« Slew of "Antique" MP3 Players Hit Radio Market |
| My Seiko Tuna SBBN017 Is in Limbo »
Yeah, $250 is pricey, but as we radio lovers know, a wooden cabinet sounds better than plastic!
Posted at 12:27 PM in Radio Lovers Can't Be Cured | Permalink
| | Digg This
I'm in agreement and I've written about it here---years ago. Interestingly, I think the variation in sound is even noticeable on lower priced radios. I have an old "Lloyds" radio with a wooden cabinet. If you compare it to a similar plastic cabinet radio----the wooden one has a warmer sound to it---at least to my ears. I can't explain why. I'll leave that to the engineers. But there is most definitely something to it. I realize that old tube radios made of wood sound fantastic (I have a couple). But that can be explained by tubes vs. solid state. However, when a cheap wooden cabinet radio sounds warmer than a cheap plastic cabinet radio----I'm at a loss to really understand the technical reasons. I only know what I'm hearing is real.
September 21, 2013 at 02:48 PM
Many wooden radios are relatively empty boxes made of wood. The warmth is likely due to the resonance of the empty, wooden box. If you knock on the side of a high quality speaker system it will sound like you're knocking on a piece of stone -- no spurious resonances (not like an empty box).
I have one portable transistor radio with a wooden cabinet that had a somewhat hollow sound with an upper bass emphasis. I filled some of the empty space inside the cabinet with pieces of foam, and now it sounds better (not so hollow and bloated). Due to heat considerations it probably wouldn't be good to to the same thing with an AC powered tube radio.
September 21, 2013 at 04:20 PM
Counterexample: One of the best sounding table radios of all time, the Advent 400 FM radio, is in a plastic cabinet, both for the radio section of the unit and for the separate speaker. Far more important than the cabinet is the quality of materials used for the speaker, the size of the speaker, and the quality of the circuitry used to drive the speaker (such as the amplifier).
It's amazing to me the amount of superstitious stuff that appears here.
Mark Roberts |
September 21, 2013 at 06:00 PM
I don't think it's superstitious. Perhaps Advent wanted better profits by using a relatively cheap synthetic material instead of wood----or they desired a more modern look. I haven't yet seen a Stradivarius violin made out of poly resin. They seem to be made of wood---at least the examples I've read about. I understand how speakers/amps have a bigger impact than the cabinet material but I don't think it's superstitious to believe that you might gain a slight edge with the wood----I've heard it.
September 22, 2013 at 05:08 PM
"Living off-grid? The ideal shortwave radio system for you"
Posted on September 23, 2013 by Thomas
Vimal Oberoi |
September 24, 2013 at 08:08 PM
Vimal, interesting article; I'd add a vote for the solar battery charger - aside from allowing you to use any radio you want, you can also charge batteries for flashlights/lanterns. I've spent many an Earth Hour playing a board game under a ceiling-bounced flashlight listening to whatever's interesting on the radio, all rechargeable-battery powered.
September 25, 2013 at 10:52 AM
As far as solar powered radios go there's an overlooked and very inexpensive option.
You know those solar led landscape path light things?
The lights on a stick people put around their driveways and such? They have a rechargeable (usually NiCad) AA cell, a solar panel to charge it, and can be had for less than $2 a pop.
September 26, 2013 at 03:04 AM
It's true those solar powered walkway lights used to use rechargeable AA batteries, but no longer. They now use a very cheap little button cell. What do you expect for a buck or two?
September 26, 2013 at 05:53 AM
Quite a few still do. The Dollar Tree out of all places has them.
If you should mistakenly get some with a button cell the solar panels are still with it. Those are good sized panels for the price.
September 26, 2013 at 12:57 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
(URLs automatically linked.)
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address