I concede we medicate ourselves with all those things, including TV and sugar, but if we say everything is a drug and make a moral equivalent to all “drugs” we consume, then the idea of “drug” and “addiction” become meaningless.
There must be a scale or hierarchy in which we determine magnitude and application of a product and how we use or misuse it.
If, for example, an organization says an even playing field is produced by banning Substance X, then that substance is illegal and can’t be compared to coffee.
In these kinds of arguments, I find inflexible moral relativism as useless as inflexible moral absolutism.
Recent Comments