

One. Principle of the Successful Thesis: A
strong thesis is the answer to a compelling question.
Two. Why is starvation an addiction for
Caroline Knapp and perhaps for others?
One. She retreats from life and withdraws into a
sense of calm. She feels safe, but she is not living. When we retreat from life
to defend our self, we choose death over life. I’m thinking of the woman whose
husband left her and she became bitter and “undateable.” See page 217.
Two. Rigid routine makes her feel safe from wanton,
self-destructive behavior. Of course, she’s blind from the fact that the rigid
routine is a form of self-destruction.
Three. Starvation becomes a “silent protest” against
ridiculous feminine ideals that are forced upon women. Starving both aspired to
the ideal and “mocks” it. See page 218. Also see page 223 in which the Kate
Moss look replaces the Marilyn Monroe look.
Four. Starvation alleviates the discomfort of
“inhabiting the female body.”
Five. Starvation is an attempt to invert the food
obsession as a positive symbol of nurturing and care-taking; in its place,
starvation is about self-rejection and “self-inflicted cruelty.” See page 218.
Six. Starvation becomes a way of avoiding
self-recriminations: “I’m such a hog” for having eaten that chocolate cake. See
page 219.
Seven. Starvation has become a Faustian Bargain, a
deal with the Devil, in which women trade eating satisfaction so that they can
enjoy self-esteem. See page 220.
Eight. Mastering and controlling one’s appetites
becomes a way of feeling empowered. This empowerment becomes a form of
compensation for feelings of loneliness, self-doubt, and consuming dread and
desperation. See page 221 bottom.
Nine. Starvation becomes a way of surrendering to the
“backlash” against the rise of feminine power. See 223 and 224.
Ten. Starvation is a reaction to an unnatural hatred
of fat. See page 224 and 225.
Eleven. Starvation is an attempt to withdraw from the
overwhelming choices that are part of a woman’s new freedom: See page 227.
Twelve. Starvation is a reaction to a woman’s new
freedom on the one hand and her lack of political power on the other. See page
228.
Thirteen. Starvation is a reaction to a world that
“mobilizes in the service of male appetite.” See page 228.
Three. Lexicon
1. Addiction to starvation 217 first paragraph
2. Obsessive compulsive rituals second paragraph
3. Anorexia 217 bottom and 218 top
4. Silent protest 218 top
5. Core cause of anorexia 218 middle and 221 second
paragraph and 223 top paragraph and 225 middle paragraph
6. Internalized caveats and rules 218 and 219 top 2
paragraphs and 221 middle paragraph
7. Female math 220 top
8. Dangerous form of hunger 222 top
9. Cardinal violation of appetite 222 bottom
10. New female aesthetic 223 second and third
paragraph; Marilyn Monroe trumped by Kate Moss
11. Backlash against feminine strength 223 bottom and
224 top
12. Visceral knee-jerk hostility to fat women and
people in general 224 bottom and 225 top
13. Buffet hostility 225 bottom and 226 top
14. Buffet as metaphor or microcosm
for Knapp's neurosis 230
Four. Study Questions
One. What is the "lure of starving"? 217
Two. What contradiction does Knapp identify on page 217?
Three. What made Knapp feel safe? 217
Four. What does Knapp mean when she writes that anorexia
both "capitulates to the ideal and also mocks it" in the context of
idealized feminine beauty? 218
Five. What overwhelming anxiety do anorexics suffer from?
218, 221, 223
Six. Why does Knapp make the distinction between
"female hunger" and "male hunger"? (Good essay topic, 218)
Seven. Describe the "dance of vigilance and
self-restraint" on page 219.
Eight. Explain the essay's title. 220
Nine. What gives Knapp a "perverse sense of
pleasure"? 220 bottom.
Ten. How does dieting make us go crazy? 222 top and
bottom.
Eleven. What happens when hunger is "divorced from
the body"? 223 top.
Twelve. What does caloric intake have to do with a woman's
"self-worth and power and identity"? 223, 227, 228
Thirteen. What is represented in the shift of feminine
ideal from Marilyn Monroe to Kate Moss? 223, 224
Fourteen. Do you agree with Knapp that the obsession with
hating fat is a "gender issue" or does the body image obsession
afflict both men and women equally? To answer, consider the term "bigorexia."
Part Five. Writing Option:
Defend or refute the following:
While Caroline Knapp's essay "Add Cake, Subtract
Self-Esteem" is chockfull of insights about her fear of being
overtaken by the appetites and the rigid rules and rituals she enforced to
allay her fears, her attempt to make the obsession with body fat a
"woman's issue" collapses under the weight of growing evidence that
men are burdened with the same body image pressures. In particular, we can look
to the equivalent of anorexia in men, bigorexia, which contains the same tyranny
Knapp so adroitly explains in her essay.
Another Writing Option:
Analyze a person you know who suffers the
"self-inflicted cruelty" of anorexia and look at the disease in terms
of its major components as laid out by Caroline Knapp.
These components include the following:
1. anorexia is a "silent protest" against
the draconian ideal of female beauty
2. the love of rules as a way of soothing anxiety and
overwhelming fear of one's appetites (223 top)
3. an obsession with "math" that makes one
calculate calories in and calories out (220 top)
4. the loss of balance between gluttony and restraint
(222 and 226 top)
5. a sense of "confused hunger" (222
bottom)
6. fear of food becomes a metaphor for the fear of
freedom (223 and 227 and 228-230)
7. the Kate Moss look became an unconscious way for
men to control women when they were enjoying their new freedom (223 bottom and
224 top)
8. peer pressure among women, veering on meanness, to
be thin (224 and 225 top)
9. self-disgust (227)
Part Six. McMahon’s Commentary on “Add Cake, Subtract
Self-Esteem” by Caroline Knapp
Whether they are bingeing or purging, irrational
eaters are in a most damnable condition--the state of having no self-control
and being helpless and fearful in the face of overwhelming appetites. These
inflamed irrational passions are so devastating that binge eaters must tiptoe
through life fearing that at any moment they will fall into the abyss of their
avarice.
Most irrational eaters, especially the women
described by Knapp, suffer shame for several reasons, including a sense of
anxiety over the disparity of their new freedoms but limited power; their
internalized "theme of vigilance and self-restraint" that often
backfires and is counterbalanced by compulsive appetites that eradicate all the
"gains" rendered from the meticulous adherence to eating rules; the
state of hunger that "becomes divorced from the body" and becomes
"loaded with alternative meanings" that have to do with unfulfilled
emotional longings; and their knowledge that violating the slender female
aesthetic will cause them to be held in tacit contempt by both men and women
alike.
This sense of shame and self-loathing becomes
exacerbated when obesity is looked at through a religious prism which would
have us condemn over-eaters as gluttons, sinners indulging their appetites,
reprobates putting their desires before God, miscreants violating our space
with their grotesque corpulence.
Scapegoated by society for putting
an undue strain on medical costs, despised for taking up our space, an unloved
for not inciting the kind of desire that we associate with Kate-Moss
slenderness, fat people represent the possibility of human failure and
rejection that we fear in ourselves. Thus many of us, overreacting to our
fears, develop a myriad of eating disorders so chronic that once ensnared in
these irrational eating habits, it is nearly impossible for many of us to free
ourselves from them and lead relatively normal lives.
Part Seven. Quiz Question:
In a 150-word paragraph, analyze the
psychological causes behind Caroline Knapp’s addiction to self-starvation.