

One. (Quiz question): What is the Baby Genius Edutainment
Complex?
It has two meanings. First, it is the intricate network of
entrepreneurial innovations designed to bilk as much money as possible from
well-intentioned albeit grossly insecure parents.
The second meaning refers to the psychological condition
known as a “complex” in which one has an exaggerated notion of one’s perceived
strengths and/or weaknesses. Parents are fearful that their children will be
left behind so they over-compensate with extreme, obsessive, and neurotic
behavior.
Two. Lexicon
- Bilk
- prodigy
- social
Darwinism (fear of not being gifted or up to par; the fear of not being
able to compete)
- fad
- pejorative
- 2
meanings of “complex”; see 451
- America’s
psychotic delusion: 451 bottom and 452 top
- Precocity
- Entrepreneurial
innovation
- Impetus
- Mozart
effect 453 top
- Debunked
(Mozart effect not reproduced in further studies)
- Narcissistic
parenting; parents who live through their children; they raise their
children to bring glory to themselves. See 459.
- Quackery;
see 454 prenatal BabyPlus System
- Correlation
confused with causality; see page 469 top
Three. What are the causes behind the Baby Genius
Edutainment Complex?
- Perverted
sense of love by which I mean that we live in a society where we don’t
feel loved unless we perform in some spectacular way. We have to have the
wow factor or we will be dismissed as nobodies.
- Parental
narcissism, that is the need for parents to feed their vanity by living
vicariously through their children’s accomplishments. In effect, these
narcissistic parents use their children as trophies.
- Fear
that one’s child will be behind.
- Ruthless
ambition rooted in social Darwinism, which tells us we must see life
essentially as a competition with winners and losers. And of course we
want to be on the winning end.
- Embracing
the idea of “giftedness” as seen on page 455
- The
clever marketing Mozart effect of the early 1990s and the gullible parents
who believe in it as if it were some kind of religion.
- The
parents’ preference of direct play over free play; see 459
Weak Thesis:
Alissa Quart’s essay is about parents who suffocate their
children with “genius products.”
True, but too obvious and too broad. And not really a thesis
at all but a fact.
Better Thesis:
While certainly Quart identifies extreme and neurotic
behavior, her alarmist essay fails to see that the baby genius complex can be a
healthy alternative to the infantile, dumbed-down entertainments that too many
American children embrace. Contrary to the portrayal of the “complex” that
Quart so robustly demonizes, the genius industry ____________________,
______________________, ____________________, and _________________________.
Better Thesis:
Poor McMahon is a misguided soul whose rigorous defense of
the baby genius industry evidences his blind eye to ______________________,
________________________, __________________________, and
_______________________________.
Comments