Summarize Twitchell’s major points in about a page. Then write a thesis that goes something like this:
Twitchell’s “defense” of materialism is really no defense at
all but rather a fatuous exposition that, straining the reader’s credulity,
collapses under the weight of soggy thinking, egregious logical fallacies, and,
amazingly, a series of asinine non sequiturs that force one to question if
Twitchell is either being sincere or ironic.
Comments