
Part One. Study Questions.
One. What is
cultural relativism? See pages 46 and 47 in which we see that different
cultures have different moral standards.
Four responses to the ticket crisis:
- moral
absolutism says it’s forbidden to steal, period.
- Contractual
agreement takes priority over stealing prohibition.
- An
uncaring society deserves to be victims of theft and, by implication,
other crimes.
- Nihilism;
screw it; anything goes because there is no such thing as right and wrong
Two. What is the
essay’s main question? Do we universally share a moral sense or are morals an
artificial construction designed to inhibit the Hobbesian throng?
Hobbesian refers to the worldview, from the philosopher
Thomas Hobbes, that human beings are animals or barbarians unless the force of
fear keeps their barbaric impulses in check.
Some criticize the Hobbesian worldview, which I share for
better or worse, as being paranoid, unduly pessimistic, and misanthropic. Of
course, a Hobbesian would call himself a “realist.”
Three. What is
Kant’s Moral Imperative? See page 49, top.
Four. How do the
two genders moralize differently? 49, top.
Five. What are
moral instincts? An unspoken revulsion to several categories of human behavior.
- betrayal
- cowardice
- cruelty
- sloth
(laziness)
- greed
- selfishness
- willful
ignorance
- using
and manipulating others
- leeching
or being a parasite of others
- dishonesty,
especially with intent to deceive (as opposed to sparing someone’s feelings
or protecting someone)
Six. How does the
term tsika confuse the assertion that morality is universal? Because tskika
emphasizes manner, and we can infer appearances, more than it does morals. See
page 54.
Seven. What is the
moral emphasis with toddlers? Mean and nice vs. right and wrong. See page 55.
Part Two: Writing Option for Essay #4 (based on #5
“Writing” on page 59)
Write a contrast essay that highlights the differences
between morality as an innate sense and morality as an artificial convention
taught by culture. Is the distinction between “innate morality” and
“conventional morality” legitimate? Explain with 4 mapping statements.
Comments