


Classroom: H 312 (contrary to Summer Catalog)
E-mail: jmcmahon@elcamino.edu
Website for students: http://herculodge.typepad.com/breakthrough_writer/
This course is designed to strengthen students’ ability to read with understanding and discernment, to discuss assigned readings intelligently, and to write clearly. Emphasis will be on writing essays in which each paragraph relates to a controlling idea, has an introduction and a conclusion, and contains primary and secondary support. College-level reading material will be assigned to provide the stimulus for class discussion and writing assignments, including a required research paper.
Student Learning Objectives:
1. Compose a clear introductory paragraph relevant to the topic.
2. Compose a clearly defined thesis statement that limits and focuses the topic of the essay.
3. Organize information to be used in the development of one's own thesis.
4. Write logically developed, organized paragraphs that support the controlling idea or thesis.
5. Develop and use varied sentence patterns effectively.
6. Use transitional words, phrases, and sentences to provide for coherence between and within paragraphs.
7. Choose and effectively use a rhetorical strategy appropriate to the topic.
8. Develop a conclusion that effectively closes the essay.
9. Paraphrase and summarize referenced material.
10. Incorporate direct quotes into one’s own exposition.
11. Use MLA documentation guidelines.
12. Avoid plagiarism.
13.Write an out-of-class writing task and find multiple sources related to a particular topic, write a research report, which shows the ability to support a thesis using analysis, to synthesize and integrate materials effectively from a variety of sources, and to cite sources in MLA format (including a works cited page). The report is organized, technically correct in paragraph composition, sentence structure, grammar, spelling and word use, and demonstrates thoughtful treatment of the topic.
Required Texts: Acting out Culture, edited by James Miller; Cooked by Louis Jeff Henderson; Rules for Writers by Diana Hacker.
Grading:
Four Research Papers 220 maximum points for 880 subtotal.
Four Surprise Closed-Book Reading Exams for 30 a piece, 120 subtotal.
Total Possible Points: 1,000 (A 900; B 800; C 700; D 600)
Policies:
You cannot make-up surprise closed-book reading exams. If you miss one, you lose 25 points. The reading tests are designed to encourage consistent attendance and reading. A class with lousy attendance and “no readership” is a class low in morale.
Late Papers: Reduce one full grade ; no late papers accepted once new set of essays is due.
Research Papers should be approximately 1,000 words, 12 font, Times New Roman, page numbers, name, and essay title in upper right hand corner (headers in Microsoft View) and Works Cited should have minimum 3 sources and spacing using MLA format.
Revisions: You may revise one paper for 10-30 pts. depending on the quality of the rewrite. Revision must be turned in one week after original due date.
If your research paper has no headers, your last name and page number on every page, your essay will be deducted 20 points.
If your research paper has no Works Cited page, you’ll lose 40 points.
Reading and Writing Schedule
June 22 Introduction
June 23 Cooked 1-39
June 24 Cooked 40-100
June 25 Cooked 101-159
June 29 Cooked 160-end
June 30 Essay 1 due in my office
July 1 Essay 1 due in my office
July 2 Holiday
July 6 The Big Organic 174-196
July 7 The Wages of Sin 192-203
July 8 Add Cake, Subtract Self-Esteem 217-230
July 9 Bring your introduction and thesis paragraph for Essay 2 to McMahon’s office
July 13 Essay 2 due in my office
July 14 Essay 2 due in my office
July 15 Love and War in Cyberspace 380-397
July 16 The Baby Genius Edutainment Complex 450-471
July 20 Essay 3 due in my office
July 21 Essay 3 due in my office
July 22 AWOL in America 358-367
July 23 Watching Torture in Prime Time 109-113
July 27 Mate de Coca 235-248
July 28 Bring your introduction and thesis paragraph to my office
July 29 Essay 4 due in my office
July 30 Essay 4 due in my office
Writing Assignments
Essay One
In the context of Cooked by Jeff Henderson, write an extended definition of the word “redemption.” Your first page should be a personal anecdote of someone who experienced the Fall followed by redemption.
Your second paragraph should transition your essay to your thesis paragraph in which you define redemption. Your definition should contain a single-sentence definition followed by about 5 distinguishing characteristics, your mapping components or mapping statements. Your body paragraphs will correspond to your mapping components.
Your research sources should include the book Cooked, McMahon’s website The Breakthrough Writer and one other outside source.
Essay Two Options (choose one)
First Option: In the context of Michael Pollan’s essay “Big Organic” (174), analyze the fraud and deception the food industry uses to market foods that are allegedly “organic” and “natural.” 5-page outline: In 2 pages, summarize Pollan's major points. Then write a thesis. As my research and Michael Pollan's essay show, the idea of "organic" is a marketing fraud evidenced by _________________, _____________________, ___________________, and ______________________. Your last 3 pages would flesh out these mapping components.
Second Option: Write a research paper that argues that the obesity crisis is neither a sin (see “The Wages of Sin” 192) nor an illness, but a complex problem that cannot be explained by a simple diagnosis. Your 6 mapping statements will explore 6 major causes of obesity. No doubt, a 5 or 6-page essay can’t address all 15 causes. That would require a book.
Third Option: In the context of Caroline Knapp’s essay, write a research paper that analyzes the causes of eating disorders.
Third Essay Options (choose one)
First Option: Analyze the mental breakdown and general pathology of the computer addicts in “Love & War in Cyberspace” on page 380.
Second Option: Defend or refute the efficacy and helpfulness of the Baby Genius Edutainment Complex as described on pages 450-471.
Fourth Essay Option (choose one)
First Option: Address a thesis that defends the right to go AWOL.
A thesis against AWOL: The military will save itself a lot of grief if it stops enforcing its stringent AWOL policies.
A Variation
It is morally bankrupt for the military to enforce stringent AWOL policies resulting in keeping the soldiers in the military service against their will. One, it is immoral to force people to kill against their will. Second, the morale of the soldiers will be compromised if the eager fighters are forced to mingle with the reluctant ones because there won't be cohesiveness. Third, soldiers not willing or able to perform their assigned duties will put their comrades' lives in peril. And finally, our armed forces recruit many marginalized people. It is certainly conceivable that these people did not fully understand what they signed up for.
An Opposing or Contrarian View of AWOL
It is crucial that the military uphold its stringent AWOL policy. Failure to do so will result in a waste of tax money used to train lame duck soldiers. Secondly, lenience will inevitably create a two-tiered system whereby the rich use their leverage to pay their way out while the poor are stuck where they don't want to be. Third, good soldiers may feel emboldened on a whim to get out of their duty. In other words, lenience creates too much temptation for even the solid soldiers. And finally . . .
Second Option: Refute or defend the use of torture as an effective form of intelligence. See “Watching Torture in Prime Time” and other sources.
Third Option: Refute or defend this thesis that addresses “Mate de Coca”:
Taras Grescoe’s essay convincingly shows that the “War on Drugs” is an absurdity wrought with contradictions, hypocrisy, cultural insensitivity, scientific humbug, and arbitrary notions of what constitutes health and pestilence to society.
The mapping components would pertain to “contradictions,” “hypocrisy,” “cultural insensitivity,” scientific humbug,” and “arbitrary notions of what constitutes good health to society” on one hand and “pestilence to society” on the other.