


One. Lexicon
1. Mother’s Myth of Sisyphus: three steps upward, five
steps backward
2. Self-abnegation: self-erasure or self-loss from
embracing a role that causes you to lose yourself because the role “isn’t you.”
See paragraph 2. She becomes “unrecognizable” in her SUV.
3. Self-loathing: hating yourself for the self-betrayal
of playing a phony role resulting in self-hatred, a condition that causes you
numb the pain and rage by drinking or engaging in some other self-destructive
behavior.
4. Vicarious narcissism: over-extending your children in
all sorts of micromanaged achievement-oriented sports and hobbies so you can
use them as trophies, making powerful statements about your superior parenthood
skills.
5. Female role reversion: insidiously (without knowing)
reverting back to old-school gender roles while trying to push your role
forward. See page 334, top paragraph.
6. The Paradox of the Super Action Female Hero. Women
politicians and TV personalities create female super hero images, which
influence real mothers. The problem is this: As real mothers try to be Super
Women, they in actuality become Super Cripples, paralyzed by the overwhelming
duties they must perform and subjugated to the traditional roles they thought
they had freed themselves from.
7. Inferiority Complex: Judith Warner sees super women in
society and feels she can’t measure up to the expectations these super women
have created. She is overcome by a roiling, seething sense of failure in
everything she does.
8. What class of women are especially subjected to the
Super Woman Paradox: Middle class to upper middle class. See page 336.
9. In the quest to be Super Mom, the mom’s,
paradoxically, don’t want to mother: See page 337 in which Warner points out
that working and non-working mothers prefer to keep their children in child
care or rely on nannies. Perhaps they’re too busy going to the gym or getting
Botox or something. Or finding the best Halloween costume to outdo the other
mothers whose children dress in “lesser” costumes. Or the mothers focus on
having the best birthday parties, often at the detriment of their children.
10.
Mommy Wars and
one-upmanship: the need to outdo other mothers, your “competition.” This gets
in the way of mothering and leads to insanity.
Two. The Super Mom
Stereotype: The 12 Signs
1. She is a svelte Nordic blonde of six feet dressed in
khaki safari-wear from J. Crew.
2. She drives a dark blue Range Rover.
3. She has a black belt in martial arts.
4. Her three children are state champions in gymnastics,
softball, and soccer and are primed, by age nine, to go to Harvard or Yale.
5. Her parties are so lavish that they are featured in
the local newspaper and stir seething envy in her neighbors.
6. She budgets $10,000 a year to hire professionals who
put up Halloween and Christmas decorations so lavish that cars line up for
miles to photograph her house.
7. She is a member of the PTA, the Rotary Club, and other
prominent organizations that fulfill her objective: To be feared in the
community.
8. She has a PhD in psychology or an MBA but only works
as a consultant for which she makes $700 an hour.
9. She doesn’t allow her children to eat anything at
school or friends’ house unless she’s checked out the food to make sure it’s
organic and not conducive to generating allergies and other pathogens.
10.
She micromanages her
children’s day from 6 A.M. until bedtime at 10 P.M. sharp so that her children
have absolutely no free time. This includes monitored cell phone calls and TV
watching.
11.
She doesn’t so much see
herself as a mother of a family as the CEO of a private company.
12.
She is the queen bee of
a coterie of brown-nosed sycophants and toadies who have devoted their lives to
massaging her ego for the privilege of enjoying the high status that comes with
associating with her.
Three. McMahon’s Scabrous Commentary
Judith Warner asserts that the super mom ideal has set back feminism
fifty years or so. But this is not a gender issue. And it has little do with
mothering. It has all to do with narcissism and power. The mothers featured in
Warner’s essay (from her book Perfect Madness: Motherhood in the Age of
Anxiety) are insecure so they
sacrifice their mothering to gain power in the workplace or in other ways. This
power-mongering has all to do with image. Of course, society pressures all of
us to conform to some fancy image or other, but we have the choice to see these
images for the sham they are. The whining and learned helplessness evident in
Warner’s screed seems less rooted in reality and more rooted in her need to
create an “issue” so she can publish a book. I’m sorry, but the “issue” of
choosing between our families and our narcissistic appetites is nothing new.
Warner merely tries to package this age-old conflict into something newfangled
to get attention and a publishing deal.
Four. Essay Option for Essay #3:
In one page summarize Warner’s essay. Then in another page profile a
“super mom” you know, either firsthand or by interviewing someone who knows
such a super mom (perhaps the child of one?). Then in your thesis you might
write something like this:
Mrs. Tuttweiller (whatever name you use) embodies the consummate super
mom evidenced by ________________, ________________, and __________________,
and ____________________________.
Another thesis:
Mrs. Tuttweiler’s self-aggrandizing role as super mom actually
compromises her duties as a mother evidenced by __________________,
____________________, and ___________, and _____________________.
Your research sources will include the child of such a super mom or a
friend of such a super mom, my blog, and Warner’s essay.
Comments