


Question One: How does the author define the term “complex”?
It has two meanings. First, it is the intricate network of entrepreneurial innovations designed to bilk as much money as possible from well-intentioned albeit grossly insecure parents.
Therefore a complex, the first definition we face, is an overproduced industry designed to aggressively market a product often resulting in a gross exaggeration of the product’s “need” for the consumer.
The second meaning refers to the psychological condition known as a “complex” in which one has an exaggerated notion of one’s perceived strengths and/or weaknesses. Parents are fearful that their children will be left behind so they over-compensate with extreme, obsessive, and neurotic behavior.
This second definition of “complex,” then refers to the ongoing sense of inferiority and inadequacy that compels people to compensate for their perceived shortcomings by behaving in irrational, self-destructive ways.
Question Two: What forces make the Baby Genius Edutainment Complex so profitable?
One. The first factor: narcissism, a form of vanity and self-centeredness so severe that the narcissist only acts in self-interest so that all other human beings, including the narcissist’s children, are pawns whose sole purpose is to feed the narcissist’s ego.
Pertaining to the BGE, narcissistic parents want their children to “succeed” in order that their children bring them glory and in effect make the children extensions of themselves and their own egos.
Narcissists are never happy because their egos can never be sated (satisfied). This insatiable ego results in a futile quest to feel “big enough” or “great enough” so that no amount of monetary success or social status can feed the beastly ego sufficiently. As a result, narcissists are bitter, competitive. They tend to see all other people as “opponents” in their ego quest. As a result, narcissists derive great glee from the failures and misfortunes of others.
Two. The second factor is social Darwinism, the condition in which the strong get stronger and the weak fall behind and eventually die off. Our instincts know this to be true so that we are possessed by a fierce competitive streak that, if left unchecked, can actually destroy us. We must find the golden mean between competitiveness and altruism (compassion for others). If we error too much in one extreme, we will pay a heavy price.
In the context of the BEC, parents fear their children will be left behind.
Three. A perverted sense of love. We don’t feel “loved” unless we perform in a certain way, unless we have the Wow Factor. This fear of not being loved compels us to embrace programs that promise to make us spectacular or “geniuses.”
Four. Many of us have, knowingly or not, embraced the idea of “giftedness” as described on page 455. “Giftedness” is the idea that hard work and ingenuity can awaken the dormant genius that is within every child. “Giftedness” is compatible with the very American idea that we are not stuck in life but have the freedom or free will to be master’s of our own destiny. Other cultures, in contrast, embrace fate, the idea that we cannot change our life course.
Five. The clever marketing of the Mozart Effect, the belief that we can stimulate brain growth by playing music in the womb and in early infancy. This belief has reached religious proportions.
Six. Fear makes parents controlling and not surprisingly this need for control has made parents embrace controlled play over free play. See page 459. Of course, controlled play costs money and there is an industry to meet this need.
Writing a Thesis for Today’s Topic
Weak Thesis:
Alissa Quart’s essay is about parents who suffocate their children with “genius products.”
True, but too obvious and too broad. And not really a thesis at all but a fact.
Better:
It’s clear that Quart’s thesis has hit a nerve because it’s all too true that parents hell-bent on making their children into “geniuses” are behaving in a morally bankrupt way. This egregious moral bankruptcy is evidenced by __________________, ____________________, ____________________, and ______________________.
Here’s another thesis:
Who’s McMahon to knock the fact that parents want the best for their children. I think raising a genius is a good thing.
Better:
In his haste to jump on the Alissa Quart bandwagon, McMahon fails to sympathize with well-intentioned parents who are using these so-called baby genius products, understandably, because they want to __________________, ________________________, ___________________, and ___________________.
Another thesis:
I’m tired of McMahon being a parent hater. If parents want to immerse their children in baby genius products, more power to them. Hey, man, it beats making them dumb. Right?
Here’s another thesis.
It’s all a matter of avoiding extremes. I’m sure if parents want to use some of these so-called baby genius products, it will do their children some good. Let’s not throw away the baby with the bath water.
Rebuttal to the above thesis:
The writer’s point, that baby genius products, can be beneficial, is an obfuscation of the real issue, namely, that the majority of parents using these products are doing so in a misguided way evidenced by ___________________, _____________________, ___________________, and _______________________.
Another Good Thesis:
While certainly Quart identifies extreme and neurotic behavior, her alarmist essay fails to see that the baby genius complex can be a healthy alternative to the infantile, dumbed-down entertainments that too many American children embrace. Contrary to the portrayal of the “complex” that Quart so robustly demonizes, the genius industry is beneficial to children evidenced by ____________________, ______________________, ____________________, and _________________________.
Another Effective Thesis:
Poor McMahon is a misguided soul whose rigorous defense of the baby genius industry evidences his blind eye to ______________________, ________________________, __________________________, and _______________________________.