5 Principles of Writing with AI
Ways to Make Your Writing Prompts AI-Resistant
1A Essay 3: How Social Media Manipulates Us
1A Essay 3: How Social Media Manipulates Us
The Purpose of Essay 3:
The purpose of Essay 3 is to interrogate the claim that social media is manipulating us and turning us into “thirsty” social media addicts. Is this claim true? Or is social media not the cause of our downfall? Is social media merely exposing the pathologies and mental frailties that are already there? Could it be that we are in the beginning stages of a Social Media Learning Curve and that our mental strain in the face of social media is both natural and predictable?
Using as your sources the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma, Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid," and Sherry Turkle’s Ted Talk video “Connected But Not Alone," write a 1,200-word essay that explains the "nosedive" or mental breakdown of Lacie Pound in the Black Mirror episode "Nosedive." Did social media cause her “nosedive” or merely expose the “nosedive” that would have happened regardless? Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.
Suggested Outline:
Paragraph 1: Using appropriate signal phrases, summarize and paraphrase the major points of Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid."
Paragraph 2: Develop an argumentative thesis in which you support, refute, or complicate the claim that social media is manipulating us to a deleterious degree.
Paragraphs 3-6: Your supporting paragraphs. At least one of your paragraphs should cite Sherry
Turkle's Ted Talk, the Black Mirror episode "Nosedive," and the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal
Paragraph 8: Your conclusion, a dramatic restatement of your thesis.
Your last page is the Works Cited page with no fewer than 4 sources in MLA format.
Argument and Counterargument for ChatGPT:
The claim that social media is manipulating us and turning us into “thirsty” social media addicts is a controversial one, and its truth depends on how we understand the role of social media in our lives. On the one hand, there is compelling evidence that social media platforms use psychological manipulation to drive engagement, increasing our dependence on likes, comments, and the dopamine rush that comes with validation. On the other hand, some argue that social media is not the root cause of our downfall but rather a reflection of pre-existing human frailties, and that we are in the early stages of learning how to use this new technology responsibly.
Argument Supporting the Claim:
Social media companies design platforms to maximize user engagement, leveraging addictive behaviors that target our psychological vulnerabilities. Studies show that platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok are built around algorithms that reward users with social validation through likes, shares, and comments, triggering dopamine responses similar to those seen in gambling or substance abuse . This cycle of reward and anticipation creates what researchers call "variable rewards," keeping users hooked because the outcomes are unpredictable but occasionally highly gratifying . This manipulation makes users continually crave more engagement, pushing them to post frequently and compete for attention, leading to what many describe as "thirstiness" for likes, validation, and approval.
Social media addiction is increasingly recognized by mental health professionals, with users reporting anxiety, depression, and feelings of inadequacy when they don't receive the validation they expect online . For many, the need to be "liked" has become all-consuming, reducing self-esteem and mental health in a vicious cycle. The pressure to curate perfect images and moments has led to a culture of performance, where our self-worth is tied to our online presence rather than genuine personal development or human connection. In this sense, social media is not merely reflecting human behavior but actively amplifying and shaping our worst tendencies.
Argument Refuting the Claim:
However, the argument that social media is the root cause of our downfall oversimplifies the issue. It can be argued that social media does not create problems in isolation but rather exposes and magnifies the vulnerabilities already present in society. From this perspective, social media is a mirror reflecting the anxieties, insecurities, and desires that were always there. Social media, like any tool, is neutral—its impact depends on how we use it. As Cal Newport argues in *Digital Minimalism*, the problem lies not in the technology itself but in our relationship with it .
Rather than blaming social media for all of our ills, it’s more accurate to see it as an amplifier of existing social and psychological issues. The compulsion for validation and attention-seeking behaviors existed long before the rise of platforms like Instagram or TikTok, as evidenced by behaviors in other areas of life, such as keeping up with societal expectations or chasing status symbols. Social media simply makes these behaviors more visible and offers a new venue for them to play out.
Moreover, some argue that we are simply in the early stages of a **Social Media Learning Curve**. New technologies often cause initial discomfort, confusion, and misuse before society adapts. In the early days of television, many warned it would destroy reading and critical thinking, yet society adjusted to its presence over time. Similarly, as we learn to navigate social media with more awareness and responsibility, we may eventually develop better habits and boundaries . Our current struggles with social media addiction, anxiety, and overuse may be temporary growing pains as we collectively learn how to use these platforms wisely.
Conclusion:
Ultimately, the truth lies somewhere in between. Social media platforms undoubtedly manipulate users through sophisticated psychological techniques, fostering a craving for attention and engagement. However, it’s overly simplistic to blame social media for all of our problems. The platform itself is not inherently harmful; instead, it amplifies existing human behaviors. As society matures and learns to navigate this new digital landscape, we may see a shift toward healthier use of social media. The challenge lies in recognizing the power of these platforms without becoming passive victims to their manipulative designs.
English 1A Essay 3 Building Block 1
Write a 300-word paragraph that compares how the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma and Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid” interrogate how social media manipulates us into a condition of stupidity, tribalism, and political polarization.
Essay 1A Essay 3 Building Block 2
Write your thesis paragraph and be sure to have at least 4 reasons in your paragraph that you’ll show support your claim.
***
In Jonathan Haidt's essay, he explores the idea that social media is fragmenting society and making us less intelligent. He argues that living in what he calls “reality silos” or “bubbles” is catering to our cognitive biases, which only reinforces our pre-existing opinions. These curated bubbles are dangerous because they flatter and affirm subjective realities, cutting off exposure to differing viewpoints. As a result, Haidt believes that we are becoming intellectually stagnant and, in effect, more stupid.
One of the central claims is that the tribalism fostered by these silos leads to chaos and mistrust. Social media encourages tribal loyalty over independent thought, making people blindly obedient to their ideological groups. This collective blind loyalty, in turn, creates a cultural environment where critical thinking takes a backseat to tribal unity, further increasing stupidity.
Additionally, Haidt points to the addictive nature of social media. The pursuit of popularity, reflected through likes, reposts, and followers, reduces our motivation to create legitimate content. Instead, we focus on going viral and earning dopamine hits. The algorithms on these platforms reward extreme and provocative behavior, which encourages obnoxious, aggressive communication rather than thoughtful dialogue. Haidt argues that this further pushes people away from meaningful connections and toward parasocial (imaginary) relationships, weakening real human bonds.
Haidt also suggests that this extremism has eroded respect for expertise and epistemic reality. Social media bubbles cultivate environments where people reject scientific consensus and expert knowledge, opting instead for conspiracy theories and political purity tests. This willful ignorance fosters more stupidity as people insulate themselves from the truth.
He also touches on the phenomenon of whataboutism, where people deflect criticism by pointing out unrelated issues, which erodes the very concept of accountability and honest discussion. By embracing this false moral equivalence, social media has made it harder to distinguish between valid arguments and empty rhetoric, worsening the cycle of intellectual decline.
Perhaps most concerning, Haidt claims that social media thrives on outrage. The more outraged we are, the more engaged we become, and this generates a cycle of constant emotional upheaval, leading to poor decision-making. This outrage-fueled engagement gets people hooked, but it also distorts their ability to think clearly, making them more susceptible to manipulation and misinformation.
In the second part of his argument, Haidt focuses on the broader societal consequences of this digital chaos. He argues that living in a world dominated by soundbites and fragmented images results in the following:
1. **Loss of Context and Historical Memory:** People lose sight of the bigger picture and fail to retain historical knowledge because they are overwhelmed by bite-sized content with no depth.
2. **Shortened Attention Spans:** Our ability to focus diminishes as we're constantly bombarded with rapid-fire information, leading to “memory-holing” important facts.
3. **Dehumanization:** As we spend more time in the digital world, we begin to see people as abstractions, making it easier to treat others with cruelty and behave barbarically.
4. **Polarization:** Social media drives us into isolated groups, polarizing political and social conversations. This leads to a breakdown in trust of shared institutions, such as government, science, and education. The fragmentation of reality makes it difficult for society to agree on facts or common goals.
5. **Mutual Incomprehension:** People from different political and social camps no longer understand each other, leading to alienation and animosity. The growing divide leaves us with “mutual incomprehension”—we literally can’t speak the same language anymore.
6. **Chaos and Desire for Authoritarianism:** As polarization deepens, so does societal chaos, leaving people desperate for order and more willing to support authoritarian or totalitarian leaders who promise to restore stability.
Haidt ultimately argues that this fragmented, outrage-driven social media environment is eroding our ability to think critically and make informed, rational decisions. Instead of fostering dialogue, it amplifies division, reduces trust, and invites chaos, creating the conditions for authoritarianism to thrive. His essay is a wake-up call to reconsider how social media is shaping our society and, in particular, our minds.
***
Write an analysis that interrogates five causes of Lacie Pound's mental disintegration in the Black Mirror episode "Nosedive" by basing the analysis on Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid.”
***
Lacie Pound's mental disintegration in the *Black Mirror* episode "Nosedive" mirrors many of the societal critiques Jonathan Haidt presents in his essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid.” Both Lacie’s downward spiral and Haidt’s analysis of modern life expose the toxic effects of social media, status obsession, and polarization on human psychology and behavior. Below are five major causes of Lacie’s breakdown, grounded in Haidt’s key arguments.
### 1. **The Tyranny of Social Media and the Pursuit of Perfection**
Haidt argues that social media has transformed into a platform where people relentlessly pursue validation through likes, shares, and followers, driving an obsession with superficial popularity. Lacie's world is ruled by a similar system, where her social media rating determines her worth and access to life’s privileges. The more likes and positive ratings she garners, the higher her societal status. This constant need for external validation leads Lacie to curate an inauthentic version of herself, mirroring Haidt’s point that social media fosters a performative culture, where users strive for perfection rather than meaningful connections. Lacie’s desperation to maintain a high rating warps her behavior, making her increasingly insincere, which ultimately contributes to her emotional collapse.
### 2. **The Fragmentation of Reality**
Haidt discusses the concept of “reality silos,” where individuals are trapped in bubbles that cater to their biases and distort their perceptions of reality. In Lacie’s case, her reality is fragmented by a rating system that limits her access to certain people, places, and privileges based on arbitrary social judgments. The disparity between Lacie’s curated online self and her real-life experiences causes cognitive dissonance, as she cannot reconcile the person she wants to be with the version of herself that is constantly judged by others. This fragmentation of identity is a direct reflection of the fractured realities Haidt describes, where the gulf between real life and the virtual world becomes increasingly difficult to bridge.
### 3. **Outrage Culture and Social Shaming**
Haidt’s essay points out that social media thrives on outrage, rewarding users who engage in aggressive, extreme, or hyperbolic behavior. In *Nosedive*, Lacie’s environment is similarly driven by a system of social shaming and reward, where people are punished or exalted based on their conformity to social norms. Lacie’s fall from grace begins when she experiences a series of minor setbacks that cause her rating to plummet, leading others to publicly shame her. The rapid escalation of her social downfall, much like in social media’s outrage culture, illustrates how quickly individuals can be ostracized and socially destroyed by the collective judgment of their peers.
### 4. **The Erosion of Authentic Relationships**
Haidt also touches on the way social media erodes genuine human connections, replacing them with parasocial or performative relationships. Lacie’s relationships, particularly with her childhood friend Naomi, are driven by utility rather than genuine emotional bonds. Lacie seeks out Naomi not because of a deep, enduring friendship, but because Naomi’s high rating can elevate Lacie’s own status. This mirrors Haidt’s critique of social media relationships, where interactions are often based on the transactional need for validation rather than sincere, meaningful connection. Lacie’s emotional breakdown is exacerbated by the realization that her relationships are shallow, leaving her isolated and vulnerable as her social standing crumbles.
### 5. **The Collapse of Trust in Institutions**
Haidt argues that the past decade has seen a collapse of trust in major institutions—government, education, media, and more. In *Nosedive*, Lacie lives in a world where the institution of the social rating system is all-powerful, dictating every aspect of life, from where she can live to whom she can associate with. Her increasing frustration with this rigid system mirrors the broader societal frustration Haidt describes, where people lose faith in once-trusted systems and become disillusioned. As Lacie’s life unravels, she becomes increasingly unhinged, lashing out in frustration and anger, just as Haidt suggests people in today’s polarized society do when they feel betrayed by the institutions they once relied on.
Conclusion:
Lacie’s mental disintegration in *Nosedive* is a chilling reflection of the same social and psychological dangers Haidt outlines in his essay. Both the fictional world of *Nosedive* and the real-world issues Haidt addresses highlight the damaging effects of social media-fueled extremism, the erosion of genuine human connection, and the societal obsession with status and validation. Lacie’s tragic downfall is a cautionary tale about the perils of living in a world where identity and self-worth are dictated by a digital system that thrives on superficiality and shame.
***
Sherry Turkle's Ted Talk Is Still Relevant
Sherry Turkle’s 2012 TED Talk *"Connected, But Alone?"* remains highly relevant today due to its timeless critique of how technology, especially social media, shapes our human connections. Here are seven reasons why her talk still resonates:
### 1. **Increasing Reliance on Technology for Human Interaction**
- In the last decade, our reliance on digital devices for communication has only increased, particularly during events like the COVID-19 pandemic. Turkle’s assertion that people are substituting meaningful in-person connections with shallow digital ones remains a critical observation of modern life.
### 2. **The Rise of Loneliness and Isolation**
- Despite being more connected than ever through social media platforms, studies have shown rising levels of loneliness, particularly among young people. Turkle’s argument that technology gives an illusion of connection while fostering emotional isolation is still a pressing issue in a world where online presence often substitutes face-to-face interaction.
### 3. **Curated and Controlled Online Personas**
- Social media encourages users to present idealized versions of themselves, curating their lives to receive validation in the form of likes and comments. Turkle's claim that we "edit" and "delete" parts of ourselves online resonates today, as platforms like Instagram and TikTok emphasize perfection over authenticity.
### 4. **Reduced Capacity for Solitude and Reflection**
- Turkle stresses the importance of solitude and the ability to be comfortable alone, without the distraction of technology. As smartphone usage becomes more pervasive, many struggle with the constant need for digital stimulation, reducing their ability to engage in deep thought or self-reflection.
### 5. **Decline in Face-to-Face Communication Skills**
- With more interactions occurring via text, chat, or video, there is growing concern that younger generations are losing important interpersonal communication skills. Turkle's warning about the decline of face-to-face conversation is increasingly relevant as studies continue to highlight the challenges young people face in developing social skills.
### 6. **The Emotional Impact of Constant Connectivity**
- The constant "ping" of notifications, messages, and updates keeps people in a perpetual state of distraction. Turkle predicted how this constant connectivity would lead to a loss of focus, emotional exhaustion, and anxiety, all of which are now widely recognized consequences of heavy social media use.
### 7. **The Search for Meaningful Conversations**
- Turkle advocates for real, meaningful conversations, something that has become more elusive in an era of quick texts, tweets, and superficial exchanges. The need for deeper, more thoughtful dialogue continues to be a concern as communication becomes more fragmented and less substantial.
Sherry Turkle’s ideas in *“Connected, But Alone?”* remain highly relevant today because the issues she highlighted have intensified as digital technology becomes more ingrained in everyday life. Her concerns about authenticity, solitude, and meaningful connection still challenge us to rethink how we use technology in our relationships.
***
Bo Burnham's *Inside* on Netflix shares key themes with the works of Jonathan Haidt and Sherry Turkle, particularly in its exploration of social media's impact on mental health, the isolation caused by digital life, and the performative nature of online interactions. Here's a breakdown of how these themes intersect:
### 1. **Social Media’s Role in Shaping Identity and Loneliness**
- Burnham’s *Inside* tackles the loneliness that comes from living life online, something both Haidt and Turkle critique extensively. Haidt, in his essay *"Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid,"* points out how social media reinforces social fragmentation, amplifies tribalism, and promotes shallow interactions. Similarly, Turkle’s *"Connected, But Alone?"* focuses on how technology gives us the illusion of connection while making us lonelier.
- In *Inside*, Burnham’s portrayal of performing in isolation, singing about his own mental health struggles, and his hyper-awareness of the performative nature of social media echo Turkle’s point that social media fosters an environment where people are “alone together”—connected superficially, but deeply isolated.
### 2. **Performative Nature of Online Interactions**
- Both Haidt and Turkle emphasize how social media turns us into performers, constantly curating our lives for public consumption. Burnham, as a comedian, highlights this theme by breaking the fourth wall in *Inside*, openly acknowledging the pressures to produce content that will attract likes and followers.
- Turkle discusses how we edit our lives online to present a perfect version of ourselves, while Haidt suggests that this need for online validation (in the form of likes and shares) creates an unhealthy dynamic. Burnham’s work mirrors this sentiment as he performs to an unseen audience, obsessing over how his content will be perceived and how it reflects his own identity. The song "Welcome to the Internet" particularly critiques how the internet has become a space where extremism, performance, and sensationalism are rewarded, reinforcing Haidt's arguments about the internet's role in fostering polarization and outrage.
### 3. **Mental Health and the Digital World**
- Burnham’s exploration of his own mental health struggles during isolation speaks to the broader issue of how social media and technology contribute to anxiety, depression, and the constant need for validation. Haidt points out that social media addiction can exacerbate mental health issues, especially among young people, who are drawn into cycles of comparison and validation.
- Similarly, Turkle talks about how technology chips away at our ability to engage in meaningful solitude, as we are constantly connected but emotionally depleted. Burnham’s isolation in *Inside* represents the darker side of this always-connected world, where real human connection is absent, and digital life becomes overwhelming.
### 4. **The Loss of Authenticity**
- In both Haidt’s essay and Turkle’s work, the issue of authenticity emerges. Social media, they argue, prioritizes performance and rewards the extreme, leaving little room for genuine, authentic expression. Burnham’s *Inside* plays with this idea through its ironic, self-referential humor, where he both participates in and critiques the very act of performance. Burnham’s commentary on performing for an audience he can’t see echoes the anxieties people feel about living performative lives for the sake of social media.
### 5. **Disconnection and Polarization**
- Haidt argues that social media has contributed to greater polarization, and Burnham’s work reflects the emotional toll this can take on individuals. The fragmentation of society, driven by algorithms that prioritize outrage and division, is something both Haidt and Burnham examine from different angles. Burnham’s existential reflections in *Inside* show the emotional fragmentation and confusion many experience in a digital world that thrives on division, much like Haidt’s concerns about polarization.
- Turkle’s ideas about how digital life fragments our social reality also align with Burnham’s critique of internet culture, where people live in fragmented bubbles, disconnected from authentic relationships and understanding.
### Conclusion:
In *Inside*, Bo Burnham captures many of the anxieties and discontents that Haidt and Turkle discuss in their works on social media and digital life. From the performative nature of online interactions to the isolation and mental health challenges fueled by constant connectivity, Burnham’s dark humor and introspective critique resonate with the ongoing concerns about how social media is reshaping our minds and relationships.