Essay #3 Options for Essay Due 4-25-17
Choose One of the Following:
One. In the context of Caleb Crain's "The Case Against Democracy" and Ilya Somin's "Democracy vs. Epistocracy" support, defend, or complicate the argument that an uninformed public lacking adequate critical thinking skills cannot support a democracy as we tend to idealize democracies but rather, at best, maintains a democracy so flawed many would argue that it cannot be called a democracy at all, but rather some grotesque sub-version of a democracy.
Paragraph 1: Summarize the problem of an uninformed populace, also known as "hobbits," and misinformed public, known as "hooligans." Or you might define the terms "hobbits," "hooligans," and "Vulcans," and give examples.
Paragraph 2: Your thesis.
Paragraphs 3-6 Your supporting paragraphs.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal.
Paragraph 8: Conclusion, a restatement of your thesis
Two. Support, defend, or complicate the assertion that the unstoppable presence of trolls on Twitter has made being on Twitter, for many, an exercise so embedded in futility that deleting one's Twitter account is probably the best option. Consult Lindy West's "I've Left Twitter," Joel Stein's "How Trolls Are Ruining the Internet," Kathy Sierra's "Why the Trolls Will Always Win," Andrew Marantz's and "The Shameful Trolling of Leslie Jones." And the following YouTube Video:
Paragraph 1: Explain the troll problem on Twitter.
Paragraph 2: Your thesis: Argue if it's too extreme or not to delete your Twitter account.
Paragraphs 3-6: Supporting paragraphs.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal section.
Paragraph 8: Conclusion, restatement of your thesis
Three. Support or refute the contention that when you consider the radical deficits resulting from use of Facebook or any similar social media site you are morally and intellectually compelled to delete your account and instead focus on doing what Cal Newport calls "Deep Work." Consult Cal Newport's Study Hacks Blog on Deep Work, Newport's YouTube video on Deep Work, Frank Bruni's "How Facebook Warps Our Worlds," Matthew Warner's "The Real Reason to Quit Facebook," and Kim Lachance Shandow's "6 Reasons to Delete Your Facebook Account Right Now."
Paragraph 1: Explain the alleged deficits resulting from social media use. Or you could summarize Tristan Harris' comparison of social media to religious cults.
Paragraph 2: Write a thesis that agrees or disagrees with the claim that "social media mode" maladapts you to meaningful, fulfilling tasks. Social media is "Cap'n Crunch," a form of binge eating that never leaves you satisfied.
Paragraphs 3-6 would be your supporting paragraphs.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal:
Paragraph 8: Conclusion, restatement of your thesis in a more emotionally powerful form to achieve pathos.
Four. In the context of Ta-Nehisi Coates' essay, "The Case for Reparations," defend, refute, or complicate that America is morally obligated to exact qualified African-Americans reparations for America's crime of an ongoing kleptocracy, which includes slavery, Jim Crow, and their ongoing legacy today.
Paragraph 1: Summarize the debate on both sides.
Paragraph 2: Your thesis.
Paragraphs 3-6 would be your supporting paragraphs.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal.
Paragraph 8: Conclusion.
Five. Develop an analytical thesis that shows how Jordan Peeles' movie Get Out builds on Ta-Nehisi Coates' notion of American kleptocracy.
Six. Support, refute, or complicate the argument that recycling is a liberal white middle class religion that speaks more to Kool-Aid-drinking tribalism than it does improving the Earth. Consult John Tierney's "The Reign of Recycling," Michael Crichton's "Environmentalism is a Religion," and Stephen Asma's "Green Guilt."
Seven. Support, refute, or complicate the argument that radical changes in the job market over the next 20 years due to robots and high-tech will compel country's to provide their citizens with a Universal Basic Income. Consult the following:
Universal Basic Income: Side Effect of the Tech Revolution?
The Progressive Case for Replacing the Welfare State with Basic Income
Why Universal Basic Income Is a Terrible Idea
Paragraph 1: What is UBI and why is it so relevant right now?
Paragraph 2: Your thesis: Is UBI viable? Is it realistic? Is it an appropriate response to 47% of jobs being lost in the next 10-20 years?
Paragraphs 3-6 will be your supporting paragraphs.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal
Paragraph 8: Conclusion
Arguments Against Universal Basic Income (UBI)
One. A dependent society is a dysfunctional society.
Two. A lack of self-reliance diseases the soul and corrupts society.
Three. Acute dependence leads to totalitarianism and dehumanization. See The Giver.
Four. Acute dependence breaks down the family unit. Parents aren't responsible for their children; the government is.
Five. Being "off the grid" makes one chronically depressed, non-productive, and unemployable.
Modify for students who don't wish to see the documentary:
Option "X":
Develop a thesis that supports, refutes, or complicates the claim that climate deniers are using logical fallacies and fake science to support their claim that "we don't really know if humans are causing climate change."
Paragraph 1: What is the scientific claim of climate change?
Paragraph 2: Do you agree that logical fallacies and manipulations are being used to deny climate change?
Paragraphs 3-6 are your supporting arguments.
Paragraph 7: Counterargument-rebuttal.
Paragraph 8: Conclusion, a restatement of your thesis.
Eight. Develop a thesis that in the context of the documentary Merchants of Doubt addresses the question: Should we have faith that "reason and faith can defeat propaganda and falsehoods." Or is such a message optimistic bias rooted in delusion?
Nine: Develop an analytical thesis that in the context of Merchants of Doubt explains the fallacies behind spin and how these fallacies can be constructed to effectively cause doubt and confusion over the legitimate claims of science.
Ten: Support or refute A.V. Club critic Ignatity Vishnevestsky's claim that Merchant's of Doubt is a "toothless" documentary larded with "artless and gimmicky" film-making.
Lesson for Universal Basic Income:
Essay Assignment Option Seven
Support, refute, or complicate the argument that radical changes in the job market over the next 20 years due to robots and high-tech will compel country's to provide their citizens with a Universal Basic Income.
A brief history of Universal Basic Income in The New Yorker.
Arguments in Support of Universal Basic Income (UBI)
One. 47% of the jobs will be lost in the next 10-20 years. We have a new paradigm that requires a new way of providing a livelihood to our citizens.
Two. UBI, which is a monthly stipend to everyone regardless of income, would be nearly a trillion dollars cheaper a year than current welfare system.
Three. UBI would eliminate need for minimum wage. Lower minimum wage would encourage more hiring.
Four. Because UBI doesn't give more money for children, UBI doesn't reward one lifestyle over another.
Five. Citizens would have more time and resources to train and get educated for more career options presuming they used their time and money wisely.
Six. Most stay-at-home parents are women who have not been justly paid for their domestic work over the centuries. UBI would help remedy that injustice.
Seven. UBI gives citizens an escape valve from an abusive job or relationship. Having guaranteed money makes it easier to bail when you have to. "This is jacked up, man. I've got to bail."
Eight. 13K a year isn't so much that you would be content to retire in your house. Most people would want at the very least to supplement their meager income with part-time or full-time work. More enterprising citizens would use their free time and money for education and job re-training.
Nine. UBI would eliminate welfare abuses and welfare fraud because UBI spells the death of welfare as we know it.
Ten. Providing for the citizens with UBI would lessen the risk of the kind of discontent that leads to nationalist nativism, a racist political movement that makes one ethnic tribe hate on immigrants as scapegoats for the country's woes.
Eleven. Addressing the counterargument that not having to work would make us lazy depressed slobs, some would argue that technology is forcing us to change and adapt. Just as coal workers are inevitably going to become extinct in the next century, we must adapt to a new employment landscape. We must either adapt or die. We must not be chained to our "Calvinism hangover," the deeply American notion that work is salvation and unemployment is a sign of sin and depravity.
Twelve. The rich know they have to share their wealth because the throng with torches and pitch forks will be knocking on their doors. In other words, UBI is much needed pacifier, a form of social control that augments the safety of the rich.
Thirteen. The open debate about UBI--the biggest debate--is the philosophical question about the nature of work. Some say UBI will kill work and that without work people will descend into depression and pathology. Others say we will adapt to this new economic landscape. One argument in favor of UBI is that even if we don't know the answer to this question definitively, we HAVE NO CHOICE but to adapt to a world where close to 50% of jobs will be lost.
Fourteen. Technology will change the human animal on a chemical level and we will be able to adapt to the new work environment as evidenced by Elon Musk's exploration into his new neural lace company. Such technologies will make us smarter and more adaptive as human beings.
Fifteen. Even if we concede that not working will turn us into lazy bums, that is the lesser evil of the economic injustice social chaos resulting from not having UBI.
Arguments Against Universal Basic Income (UBI)
One. A dependent society is a dysfunctional society. Dependence, in other words, leads to laziness.
Two. A lack of self-reliance diseases the soul and corrupts society. The dependent will drag down the producers.
Three. Acute dependence leads to totalitarianism and dehumanization. Once you take a government handout, you become vulnerable to the government's control over every part of your life. See The Giver.
Four. Acute dependence breaks down the family unit. Parents aren't responsible for their children; the government is. Why stick to your family, when you don't rely on them?
Five. Being "off the grid" makes one chronically depressed, non-productive, and unemployable. Our identity and sense of wellbeing is tied to having a job.
Six. There is no increment for children. Why not? Because you're not encouraged to have children to get more. Some find this a form of lifestyle control. Others like it.
Seven. The estimated 13K a year isn't enough though some say that still puts people in the top 12% of all global earners.
Eight. Unless all countries had equal UBI, the more desirable UBI countries would be a magnet for people of other countries who'd swarm into "healthy UBI" countries to bilk their system.
Nine. UBI is giving 15% of average national income. This would require tax revenue of 15% of national income. That is too much tax, some say, for such a small income.
Consult the following:
Universal Basic Income: Side Effect of the Tech Revolution?
The Progressive Case for Replacing the Welfare State with Basic Income
We can afford UBI, but is it a good idea?
Why Universal Basic Income Is a Terrible Idea
A Primer or Introduction to Universal Basic Income
Economist gives us an introduction to UBI.
Psychology Change Needed for Universal Basic Income
Arguments for Universal Basic Income
3 Reasons for Universal Basic Income from Brookings Institute
Pro-Work Argument for UBI
Washington Post article that argues UBI won't make America great again.
Challenging the American Work Ethic
There is a notion in America, from the beginning of its European history, that being a hard worker means being noble, virtuous, and successful.
The contrary is also assumed: If you're poor and unemployed, your life is evidence that you are a member of the damned. You are morally depraved and bankrupt.
This notion comes from a form of Protestantism called Calvinism. John Calvin said evidence of being a member of God's elect was being a hard worker. German philosopher Max Weber said this became the "Protestant Work Ethic," the fuel of American capitalism.
Read "The Protestant Work Ethic Is Real"
Perhaps the American Work Ethic is Based on Unexamined Opinions
Inherited opinions: These are opinions that are imprinted on us during our childhood. Robert Atwan writes they come from “family, culture, traditions, customs, regions, social institutions, or religion.”
Involuntary opinions: These are the opinions that result from direct indoctrination and inculcation (learning through repetition). If we grow up in a family that teaches us that eating pork is evil, then we won’t eat at other people’s homes that serve that porcine dish.
Considered opinions. Atwan writes, “These are opinions we have formed as a result of firsthand experience, reading, discussion and debate, or independent thinking and reasoning. These opinions are formed from direct knowledge and often from exposure and considering other opinions.”
Some questions to consider about the work ethic for your UBI paper:
Should we really have a work ethic for menial, repetitive jobs that reduce us to human routers?
Don't jobs prevent us from spending time on our real interests and passions?
Have we been brainwashed by the Protestant Work Ethic so that we are contented "rabbit workers" for our employers?
Comments