Because
of the similar price (both go for about 150 dollars even though the
Recepter can be found on sale for a lot less, sometimes around 100
dollars), radio buyers are inclined to compare the Boston Acoustics Recepter to the Tivoli Songbook.
In many ways, these are different radios so that they don't make an apt
comparison. The main difference is that the Songbook is marketed and
designed flat to fit snug in a suitcase as a travel radio. However, a
lot of buyers looking for an upscale radio want a good mini sound
system for their bedroom or den or kitchen. Since both of these radios
produce better sound and receive better reception than most radios and
since both have an upscale feel and appearance, they are often
compared. So let's look at how they compare point by point:
One. Stability: The winner is the BAR. Its low stance makes it
resist falling over. The Songbook on the other hand is like balancing a
plate. One careless toggle and you can make it crash backwards.
Two. Headphone jack: The winner is the Songbook because it has a
headphone jack whereas the BAR does not. Now because the Songbook flips
over way too easily and because the BAR has no headphone jack, NEITHER
RADIO IS ADEQUATE FOR A BEDSIDE CLOCK RADIO. If you sleep alone and
don't need to use headphones, then this is a mute point of course. In
that case, you'd be happy with the BAR. But if you need a strong
bedside clock radio and don't mind confusing alarm controls, your best
bet would be a Sangean WR-2. For a more thorough discussion of the WR-2 in which I compare it to two other premium radios, CLICK HERE.
Three. FM Reception: A tie. This is curious because even though the
Songbook has a preferred telescopic FM antenna, its FM reception is no
better than the BAR, which is equipped with a piggy tail wire antenna
in the back. FM on both radios is excellent.
Four. AM Reception: The BAR is the clear winner. Its rich sound
makes AM talk radio sound intimate, like the people talking are in the
room. It hides unwelcome AM sounds better than the Songbook. I don't
think the Songbook is a good choice for heavy AM listeners.
Five. Price: The BAR, which can be found for 100-130 dollars rather
easily, is the clear winner over the Songbook, which is never on sale.
Six. Sound: While this is subjective, I prefer the BAR. But both the
BAR and the Songbook produce more than adequate sound, especially since
they have only a monoaural speaker.
Seven. Style: While the BAR is an attractive radio, it does not look
as cool as the Songbook. The black version is stunning and if you're
looking for a hip style for your home radio and don't mind spending 150
dollars, you'll probably be very happy with the Songbook, especially if
you're not a big AM listener.
Eight: Compatible with your computer office. Both are losers here
because neither has a remote control and I guarantee if your radio is
not at least four feet away from your computer, you're going to
experience ugly sound interference. For your office, you'll want to
toggle your presets with an upscale radio that comes with a telescopic
FM antenna and a remote control. For that, there's only one radio, the Eton Sound 100.
Conclusion: For home use, I recommend the BAR. For a travel radio, I think the Songbook is too pricey. I'd go for the Sangean PR-D5,
which selling for 75-100 dollars depending on the vendor, offers better
reception, dual stereo speakers, and a bigger internal AM antenna at a
considerably lower price. In fact, the PR-D5 would make an excellent
home radio for buyers comparing the Songbook against the BAR. For a
more thorough discussion of the PR-D5 in which I compare it to the
Recepter, CLICK HERE.
For hipsters who want style and who don't listen to a lot of AM, the
Songbook is a great choice. I gave my red Songbook as a present to my
friend who only listens to FM and he loves his Songbook. In conclusion,
there is no perfect radio for everyone. You have to identify your wants
and preferences first, then decide.
Recent Comments