
Tom Welch has linked me to Three Radio Kings Competition, but I don't know which one is the winner since I can't read the Chinese. If anyone can, please let me know.
« Is the Grundig Satellit 750 Late in Arrival or Mere Vapor Ware? | Main | A Scallop Isn't Always a Scallop »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
Greetings from Seattle, WA! I love your site!
Thanks to the wonders of Google's translation utility, the synopsis of the 3 Strong AM Performers: with the exception of not being able to match the hi-fi sound of the GE SRII, the CCRadioPLus came out on top in all of the important categories. Details are below. Not sure if the reviewer took advantage of the EX5's selectable sideband synch, though...
The blow-by-blow:
Sensitivity
1. (tie)CCRadio Plus
1. SuperRadio II
3. ICF-EX5 - the only difference was that the ICF-EX5 was slightly less sensitive only on the upper part of the band.
Selectivity
1. (tie) CCRadio Plus
1. ICF-EX5
3. SuperRadio II
Sound
1. SuperRadio II (10 on a scale of 10)
2. CCRadio Plus (7 on a scale of 10)
3. ICF-EX5 (4 on a scale of 10)
Tuning ease
1. CCRadio Plus
2. ICF-EX5
3. SuperRadio II
Extra features
1. CCRadio Plus
2. ICF-EX5
3. SuperRadio II
Posted by: Kevin | July 21, 2008 at 07:57 PM