I'd be a liar if I said I didn't covet this JVC Boombox, but it's beyond my price range.
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Men Between Age 20-50 Generally Do Not Read Fiction And When They Do It's About Alienation | Main | Put on Your Big Boy Pants: There's a JVC RC-M90JW8 Boombox for Sale: $1,500 »
July 29, 2009
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Google Ads 1
Advertisements
Advertisements
Recent Comments
- chipbutty on Art, Gary, and I Agree on the Sangean PR-D5: A Disappointment
- kevin in texas on Ed's Review of the Proton 320
- MaPa on My Daughters Want Fat Dad over Disciplined Dad
- Igor on Commanding Wrist Presence of the Citizen CC3067-88E GPS Satellite Eco-Drive
- T Doty on Rick's Ward Airline GEN 1474A Radio
- herculodge on My Daughters Want Fat Dad over Disciplined Dad
- herculodge on Piano Song for August, 2016
- MaPa on My Daughters Want Fat Dad over Disciplined Dad
- Valeri on Piano Song for August, 2016
- Ali on Review of the Panasonic RF-1350 AM/FM/SW Radio.
Recent Posts
- Should I Sell the Seiko SBDC051?
- Wrist Shots of the Seiko Captain Willard SBDC109
- My Daughters Want Fat Dad over Disciplined Dad
- Commanding Wrist Presence of the Citizen CC3067-88E GPS Satellite Eco-Drive
- Are You Re-Buying the Citizen Promaster CC3060-10E for 2020?
- Is My Romance with Mechanical Watches Coming to an End?
- Possible Faulty AGC on Gary's Refurbished PR-D4W
- Seiko Going for Striking Blue Dials for 2018/2019
- Take the Watch Addiction Questionnaire to See If You Need to Go to Rehab
- Amazon Selling Certified Refurbished Sangean PR-D4W for $47
August 2020
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
Pages
Companion Website: Breakthrough Writer
Categories
- 3,000 Calories a Day
- Autophilia
- Binary Studies
- Books
- Car Fury
- Career Advice
- Chukka Report
- Confessions
- Current Affairs
- Dear Friendly Fitness
- Dear Herculodge
- Dog Lovers of the World Unite
- Dog People
- eBay Matters
- Egomania
- Faustian Bargains
- Food and Drink
- Food Crusader Speaks
- Gasbags
- Good News, Bad News
- Hate to Burst Your Bubble
- Hellacious Fallacies
- Hipster Makeover
- Ignoramus
- Logic Behind Contradictions
- Man Points Advice
- Man Who Loved Radios Too Much
- Manly Watches
- Music
- Needy People
- Neurotic Chronicles
- Parenting
- Personal Chronicles
- Philosophy
- Physical Fitness
- Quote of the Day
- Radio Lovers Can't Be Cured
- Rules for Marriage
- Saddest Man in the World
- Shopping
- Sound Systems
- Sports
- Television and Movies
- Those People
- Troglodyte Behavior Studies
- Urban Paranoia
- Vegetarian Meals
- Watch Repair
- Web/Tech
- Weblogs
- Wines
- Writing
Beyond your price range and mine, and I expect most people's, but that certainly is a beautiful-looking radio.
What I appreciate most is that it is not stereo. I always thought that the old generic boombox design was dishonest in that most did not have adequate distance between the speakers for true stereo separation. Plus stereo only works for FM.
But $1300? And the seller lists the auction number of a similar set that sold for $2,000 on the first bid. For a radio with a cassette recorder that only records and plays in mono? Are these prices even for real?
Posted by: Mike W | July 29, 2009 at 06:17 PM
I agree. On the other hand, a boombox recently sold for over $500 on a bidding war.
Posted by: Jeffrey McMahon | July 29, 2009 at 07:34 PM
This boombox it´s beatiful but having 1,3000 dollars in my pocket is more beatiful !
Posted by: Huesby | July 30, 2009 at 03:44 PM