« Sangean Industrial AM/FM Radio with iPod On Sale for $249 | Main | Sony ICF-7800 Fold-Up Radio Bidding on eBay Today »

October 05, 2009

Comments

Shorty

Connect a sensitive Hi-Fi set of headphones and you're in business. This is a sturdy overachiever of a radio. If you were to connect an FM transmitter to this baby, you can listen on your home stereo or any better-sounding FM receiver. Heck, re-broadcast Radio Havana on a free FM station and freak your neighbors out!

Angelo

I picked a gently used one up on E-Bay for around $100.00---a guy used it for a few months sailing on his cabin cruiser around the West Indies. I love it. I usually listen through earphones, so the reportedy subpar speaker doesn't impact me at all. It's a station hound. I'm still learning the SSB function---seems to be hit or miss with that. I haven't found a better "modern" radio for the price of $140.00 new.

kr

well, had one arrive today that i "won" on ebay for $95 & $10 shipping. looks to be maybe 1.5 years old. looks nice, don't know how to program it yet. i got tired of a high whine in my hallicrafters when listening to conspiracy theory shortwave at night, that and i had a hard time picking the station up. so i jumped from 1950 to what, 2005 or so? we'll see how it does. feels well made. pretty soon we are going to have an AM showdown at this house with the sony vs the crane SW versus the national panasonic waterproof versus the zenith 755 from 1950 something. place your bets.

Mike W

There is nothing wrong with your Hallicrafter, KR.

That heterodyne squeal is coming from a Rothschild-controlled transmitter in Luxembourg installed to keep Americans from discovering the truth.

Gary

My CCR-SW is far more sensitive on mediumwave AM than my 7600GR.

My SR III and Sony 2010 are noticeably more sensitive than the CCR-SW (the difference is a lot smaller than between the CCR-SW and 7600GR).

The Sangean PR-D5 that I tried was slightly more sensitive than my SR III.

Gary

C. Crane implies that the CCR-SW and PR-D5 are about as sensitive as the older CCR on AM. Since the PR-D5 that I tried is quite a bit more sensitive than my CCR-SW, it appears that this may not be the case. Is my experience typical?

herculodge

Mike W and I both got a lot better AM on our PR-D5s than our CCR-SWs.

kr

well, how would you guys set up a scientific test for radio head to head combat?

i was assuming i would go outside on the deck, have fresh batteries in all units and maybe try to find 3-5 stations on am, fm, and sw. also i may put the same pair of headphones on each to take away speaker characteristics. i would use the old QSL SINPO deal (signal, interference, noise, propagation, and overall) and rate each station. then i would compare sound quality for each speaker.

then i would type up my results and send them to herculodge where he would list that between manly watch sightings and vegetarian food recipes.

anyhow, who has the standard objective radio testing methodology worked out? thanks

Mike W

Gary, Jeff, yes, the original CCR and the PR-D5 seem to be pretty much identical as MW receivers. Not coincidentally, both are Sangeans. The CCR-SW is more in the Redsun 2100/Grundig S350DL class, lesser MW performers.

KR, I have seen radiophile websites with lots of numbers, dynamic range, noise floors, radios hooked up to oscilloscopes, etc., but I am nowhere near that technical level myself.

Putting two radios side-by-side and tuning around in the evening, perhaps with a notepad to keep score with, should be sufficient to determine which receiver is better in practice, however. For close calls, I have found that headphones can help.

herculodge

Mike, does the S350DL have a 150mm or 200mm ferrite? Its AM, as you say, is less impressive than the the PR-D5 and CCR. Readers thus far have given me different ferrite numbers on the S350DL.

Mike W

I was pretty sure it was 150mm, Jeff, but can't find any proof of that on the web now.

Mike W

This review :

http://www.radiointel.com/preview-bcl2000p.htm

Includes a picture of an early model with the back cover off. The ferrite antenna is exactly 60% the length of the radio's total width. Since the total width is 272mm, that puts the antenna at less than 200mm. I do not think they changed the antenna for the others in the series.

Mike W

Sorry, make that 0.7 the length, which puts the antenna at 190mm. I must have still been sleepy.

herculodge

Mike, thanks. That's still smaller than the PR-D5s and I've never enjoyed the AM sound from the S350.

kr

yeah the honey moon with the sony is a little over. i still cant pick up 5070 out of nashville very well at night in the back bedroom of a brick house. going to buy a 1/8 mini-plug to 2 screws adapter and connect the dipole to it, but i dont think it will ever be super clear. i do like the look and feel of the sony, of course its not a speaker to rock out with, more like just listen to talk.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Advertisements






  • Advertisements

Advertisements






  • Advertisements

Advertisements






  • Advertisements
My Photo

Advertisements






  • Advertisements

Advertisements






  • Advertisements

Advertisements






  • Advertisements

August 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
Blog powered by Typepad

Pages

Companion Website: Breakthrough Writer

My Photo

Become a Fan