While I'm getting strong AM on my Sangean LB-100, Gary reports otherwise (environmental factors at work here?):
I finally bought a Sangean LB-100. I'm surprised at just how weak the AM reception is. Even the strongest local stations that I regularly listen to -- KFI and KNX -- have an excessive amount of hiss. My CCRadio-SW and Sangean WR-2 get far better reception. Even my little Tecsun PL-380 has better AM sensitivity. The LB-100 doesn't seem to be any more sensitive than my little Sangean DT-400W, which is pretty amazing considering the size difference between the two. The LB-100 has about a 3" ferrite bar, but the one in the DT-400W is much shorter.
When using the LB-100 with my Black Box tunable, passive loop -- a rectangular loop similar in performance to the Terk loop -- the AM is much better, and totally hiss free on the stronger stations. I hadn't intended on using the LB-100 with a passive loop, as this reduces the convenience quite a bit, since you have to move the loop around with the radio, and re-tune the loop for each station.
I find that the LB-100 has a little too much upper bass for talk radio, but it's acceptable. I probably wouldn't be happy with the U3's sound quality on talk radio. I apparently prefer less bass on AM than Jeff does. This is one reason why radios with significant bass response should have a bass control instead of just a tone (treble) control. Of course, the LB-100 has neither.
On the plus side, the FM sensitivity of the LB-100 seems quite good, even with the little rubber duck antenna. And the sound with FM music is very pleasing.
I'm not sure if the AM performance of my LB-100 is typical or not. I'll have to decide whether to keep it or return it. This is pretty disappointing.
Recent Comments