
$50 seems like a big hike between the first Solo and the Solo II. Are we talking more than improved firmware here?
I loved my Solo a fews years back . . . until the AM died. Same thing happened to my BA Horizon Duo, 3 models, all exchanged until I gave up.
Update: Paul writes:
The
specs are here: http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/solo_npa.pdf http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/Solo_II_npa.pdf The manuals are here: http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/Solo_MAN.pdf http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/Solo_II_MAN.pdf And guess what? The two radios are identical. Way to go Boston
Acoustics! Second Update, A Minor Consolation? Ed S writes: I bet they have found a way to stop the AM section from frying, and the loss of AM pre-sets with power interruption, although this doesn't justify the price increase of course. I believe this because BA finally gave me a Duo that seems to not have those 2 major problems, so far (about 10 months now). BA also calls it the "Duo Plus" now I think.

The specs are here:
http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/solo_npa.pdf
http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/Solo_II_npa.pdf
The manuals are here:
http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/Solo_MAN.pdf
http://www.bostonacoustics.com/PDFs/Solo_II_MAN.pdf
And guess what? The two radios are identical. Way to go Boston Acoustics!
Posted by: Paul | August 28, 2010 at 09:26 PM
Paul,
I bet they have found a way to stop the AM section from frying, and the loss of AM pre-sets with power interruption, although this doesn't justify the price increase of course.
I believe this because BA finally gave me a Duo that seems to not have those 2 major problems, so far (about 10 months now).
BA also calls it the "Duo Plus" now I think.
Posted by: Ed S. | August 29, 2010 at 07:00 AM
The difference between these two radios is $50.00.
Posted by: Tom Welch | August 29, 2010 at 01:38 PM