
Hobbies can be a good thing. They provide a healthy escape and distraction. Or they can cross the line and make us fail to confront problems that need confronting.
Or they can cross the line and become addictive.
I see this with my own hobbies whether they be radios or watches or whatever. On a personal note, I’ve always had obsessive tendencies, since early childhood (had an encyclopedic knowledge of dinosaurs at the age of seven) so hobbies and obsession are nothing new to me.
One thing I’ve noticed about blogs that draw people together, whether I’m on a website about watches or politics, is that a lot of people are lonely. I just read a watch geek’s thread about him owning close to 250 watches.
He buys the watches, then talks about them on various sites. I see a lot of loneliness there. I’m not above loneliness. And I’m not above admitting it’s powerful to connect with others regarding similar interests.
One word that fascinates me about this subject of connecting with others is limerence. I came across this word recently while reading David Brooks’ The Social Animal. We tend to be drawn to people who are like us. We seek such people in romance and friendship.
Making these connections is fine by me. I just don’t want to be the guy who buys 250 watches.
I would argue that the availability of DSP chips is a real game-changer, the biggest change in radio since digital tuning. It certainly is for FM reception -- no more front-end overload, the bane of relatively sensitive but cheap radios! The jury seems to be out for the other bands; there seem to be more variables in play. But for FM, most of my DSP-based cheap radios perform comparably to my mid-to-high-end NAD tuners.