« Review of the Sangean WR-12 Coming Soon | Main | If I Would Have Known Now What I Know Today »
This Amazon reviewer likes his new second generation Seiko Monster SRP311, but he writes his first generation Monsters have better lume. That is disappointing. The lume is a huge part of this watch's appeal.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
Or it simplifies things - now you don't necessarily need one and can move on to other prey.
Posted by: jonnybardo | November 09, 2012 at 04:57 AM
It's astonishing to me that on a relatively expensive watch---they don't just use the top of the line lume every time. Why show any vulnerability on this issue?
Posted by: Angelo | November 09, 2012 at 05:12 AM