« Fattest Guy in the Teacher's Lounge Always Knew Most About How to Lose Weight | Main | Is The Seiko "Sumo" Prospex $200 Better Than the Seiko Kinetic Diver SKA371? »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
I wasn't planning on one anyway, but I don't see how you recover from such a bad start. For about a year anyone who knows is going to wonder if they're getting the old one or the new one. Sangean would have been better advised to change the model number, maybe to WR-12A, to make that clear.
Posted by: Bill | February 02, 2013 at 10:25 AM
I think I'm going to pick up the bluetooh version from Amazon, it seems like they have a fresh stock. I never had one of the inital WR-12's, but I have a WR-2 and a WR-5 I can compare it to. If I like the WR-12BT I'm going to sell the WR-2 to a guy who's been eyeing mine at work.
Posted by: nathanjr | February 02, 2013 at 04:18 PM
Nathan, please give us your impressions of your WR-12BT.
Posted by: herculodge | February 02, 2013 at 04:38 PM
Bill is right. Talk about digging yourself into a deep hole. Sangean should have never let this happen.
Posted by: Angelo | February 03, 2013 at 04:20 AM
There is finally a positive review on Amazon. I'd like to think the reviewer has one of the "corrected" radios Sangean claims to be selling now and that the review reflects those improvements/corrections, but unfortunately there's no way to tell from the review.
Posted by: John | February 04, 2013 at 07:28 AM