Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Can We Put Sugar and Coffee on the Same Scale as Performance-Enhancing Drugs? | Main | Creative Accounting for the Watch Obsessive »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 |
I received a brand-new G3 at the $47.21 price from Amazon on Saturday. It was sealed, and clearly not a return. This was my second G3 purchased from Amazon so far.
The first G3 I bought was around Christmas, a gift for my nephew who is 12. I tested it alongside my G5. I also tested my new $47 G3 alongside the same G5. Both G3's appear to have the same primary disadvantages in comparison with the G5:
-Tinny audio
-Less sensitivity on SW
-Tuning using the encoder is slower (more effort)
-Volume control range / resolution as described above (made me chuckle!)
The synchronous detection is a nice feature, but it doesn't work well enough or consistently enough for me. I have lots of other radios, so I don't particularly care.
I consider the G3 at that price kind of like a good value FM radio that also has some mixed bag of "fair" to "good" AM performance.
At some point I will compare the two G3's when I see my nephew again. Also a friend of mine bought one at the same price, but I have yet to hear if his was a dud or not. It'd be luck if we can get all three G3's together to see if they are consistent. We'll soon see.