Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Sangean ATX-909X Review | Main | Readers Defend the Sony ICF-F10 »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
That's a well-worn watch. I'm pretty sure none of my watches would go that route because I don't wear any of them enough. I suppose the most likely to go that way would be the SKZ267 with its plastic sides. We'll see in a few years.
Posted by: jonnybardo | June 28, 2013 at 04:43 PM
I'm surprised Seiko uses plastic parts for these "guard" pieces. It seems that they could have just as easily used metal parts.
My Casios are all plastic, so I guess the whole case will deteriorate at some point.
Posted by: Gary | June 28, 2013 at 06:46 PM
This is why I always avoid watches that have this "sporty" combination of materials. Plastic is susceptible to damage from skin oils and ultraviolet radiation, but I suppose they use it over metal because it's just much cheaper. Same thing with bracelets that use a few plastic links; they almost always break. Swatch are particularly prone to that.
Posted by: Ulysses | June 29, 2013 at 12:56 AM