Post a comment
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Why We Long to Connect with the Music from Our Teens | Main | Viewer Request: First Look Panasonic RF-888 (Posted in 2008) »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
30 | 31 |
A watch that costs north of $400.00 shouldn't need to have its bracelet replaced immediately after purchase. That should stop with the Monster series----which can be had for around two bills. But when you double that price, the bracelet needs to be a quality piece.
Posted by: Angelo | July 28, 2016 at 04:45 PM
Seiko is notorious for using cheap bracelets, especially clasps, on their watches costing as high as 2K. They do it because they can. To be fair to the Sumo, a lot of people like the stock bracelet. I prefer to make it "mine" with the Endmill.
Posted by: herculodge | July 28, 2016 at 05:14 PM