I consider myself
a modern man, sensitive to the ways women have been subjugated to various forms
of exploitation and oppression in the history of the marriage contract, not the
least of which are outlandish dowries foisted upon the woman’s family and
“arranged” marriages with unscrupulous ogres who don’t want a wife so much as
they desire an auxiliary functionary who will aid them in their pleasure
seeking and self-aggrandizement. I am also aware of the staggering divorce rate
in these modern times, with the odds against even the most well-intentioned
couples to have a thriving, enduring marriage. Alas, we read every day in the
gossip rags and entertainment websites about the decadent lives of celebrities
who trade in their spouses with the turning of every season or who in engage in
scandals so elaborate that they would not believed if they were presented in
works of fiction. Saturated with the hedonistic scandals, we tragically feel
entitled to experience the same “freedom,” the kind that results when we
unfetter ourselves from a well ordered marriage with agreed-upon rules of
conduct.
Indeed, it seems
to me that one of the major reasons behind the collapse of today’s marriages is
that they lack structure, definition, and rules. Without a clear definition of
what a marriage should be, and what it should not be, and without rules and
boundaries to protect the rights and the sanctity of each individual spouse,
there is confusion, abandonment, and inevitable hurt.
Another result of
a marriage without a firm definition and rules is that it quickly degrades into
the adolescent’s notion of a marriage—a Big Goody Box. Whenever you want a
goody, you reach into the Goody Box and you keep taking and taking until the
Goody Box is empty upon which you discard the Goody Box and find yourself a new
one. Sadly, this is what marriage has become for too many of us and it accounts
for our epidemic divorce rate. This Goody Box marriage is not the kind I want
to have. I want one that is strongly defined and the strength of its definition
lies in its firmly established policies.
Now let me make it
clear that last thing I want to do is turn my marriage into a stifling prison
wrought with countless rules and regulations. Therefore, as I consider the
appropriate boundaries my marriage needs in order for me to function at my
optimum level as a husband, I want to be sure to maintain a balance between
order and freedom. Lean too heavily in one direction and the marital equilibrium
will be thrown way off course. And how difficult it is to restore that balance.
Balance, of
course, is the key to any healthy marriage. Husband and wife are lovers but not
lovers at the expense of friendship. Otherwise, when their passion fizzles and
there is no friendship to take up the slack they will shun each other. On the
other hand, if they are friends, or “good buddies,” at the exclusion of
passion, they will be less husband and wife and more like roommates and as such
they will violate the marriage ideal. Therefore, my arduous task to lay down
rules and regulations is not in the slightest about my need for control and
power. Rather, it is about my hunger for balance.
Another compelling
force behind my rule-making is my desire to be at my best, both mentally and
physically. A healthy husband is in far better condition to serve the needs of
his wife and his marriage in general. Therefore, with sober mind I wish to
establish a few rules, gentle guidelines if you will, that will provide a
counterpoint to our culture’s nebulous, sometimes hedonistic, definition of
marriage, to give my wife a clear idea of what I need in order to serve her
well as her husband, and to maximize my physical and mental health so that I
can be at my best to fulfill her needs. If laying down the rules required to
make a marriage run more smoothly strikes you as dictatorial, please consider
that for a marriage to survive and thrive love alone is never enough. Love
without bread will wither like a flower in the desert. And just as love needs
bread, it also needs rules. If we agree with this principle, then we may
proceed.
Recent Comments