April 2024

04/25/2024

Teach The Road, World War Z, and Pandemic for 1A?

For 1A?

In 7 ways, compare the fragility of civilization in Cormac McCarthy's novel The Road and the 2013 movie World War Z.

ChatGPT

Certainly! Here are seven ways to compare the fragility of civilization in Cormac McCarthy's novel "The Road" and the 2013 movie "World War Z":

Cause of Collapse: In "The Road," the collapse of civilization is not explicitly explained, but it is implied to be the result of a catastrophic event, possibly a nuclear war or environmental disaster. In contrast, in "World War Z," civilization collapses due to the rapid spread of a zombie virus, leading to widespread chaos and panic.
Nature of the Threat: In "The Road," the main threat to civilization comes from environmental devastation, scarcity of resources, and the breakdown of social order. In "World War Z," the threat comes from the sudden emergence of zombies, which pose a direct physical danger to humanity and lead to societal collapse through their relentless attacks.
Response of Survivors: In "The Road," survivors are depicted as struggling to maintain their humanity in the face of overwhelming despair and hardship. They scavenge for food, avoid dangerous encounters with other survivors, and cling to the hope of finding a better life. In "World War Z," survivors are depicted as fighting for their lives against the zombie threat, often resorting to extreme measures to protect themselves and their loved ones.
Representation of Morality: Both works explore questions of morality and ethics in extreme circumstances. In "The Road," characters grapple with difficult moral choices as they navigate a world devoid of traditional societal norms. In "World War Z," characters face moral dilemmas as they confront the reality of having to prioritize survival over compassion for others in a world overrun by zombies.
Portrayal of Hope: Despite the bleakness of their respective worlds, both "The Road" and "World War Z" offer glimpses of hope amidst the devastation. In "The Road," the bond between the father and son serves as a source of hope and resilience, providing moments of warmth and humanity amidst the darkness. In "World War Z," there are instances of heroism and resilience as survivors band together to fight against the zombie threat and search for a cure.
Impact on Human Relationships: Both works explore the impact of societal collapse on human relationships. In "The Road," the father-son relationship is central to the story, highlighting the importance of familial bonds in the face of adversity. In "World War Z," relationships are tested as survivors struggle to trust one another in a world where anyone could be infected and turned into a zombie.
Resolution and Future Prospects: In "The Road," the novel ends ambiguously, leaving the fate of the characters and the world uncertain. In contrast, "World War Z" ends with a sense of hope as humanity begins to rebuild and find solutions to the zombie threat, suggesting that civilization may endure despite the challenges it faces.

These comparisons highlight the different ways in which "The Road" and "World War Z" explore the fragility of civilization and the resilience of the human spirit in the face of existential threats.

In 7 ways, compare the fragility of civilization in the 2013 movie World War Z and the COVID pandemic.

ChatGPT

Certainly! Here are seven ways to compare the fragility of civilization in the 2013 movie "World War Z" and the COVID-19 pandemic:

Rapid Spread of Disease: Both scenarios feature the rapid spread of a deadly disease. In "World War Z," the outbreak of a zombie virus quickly escalates into a global pandemic, with infected individuals turning into aggressive zombies within seconds. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic saw the rapid transmission of the novel coronavirus, spreading from a localized outbreak to a global health crisis in a matter of weeks.
Collapse of Public Order: In both situations, there is a collapse of public order as governments struggle to contain the spread of the disease. In "World War Z," chaos erupts as cities are overrun by hordes of zombies, leading to mass panic, looting, and breakdowns in law enforcement. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were instances of civil unrest, panic buying, and challenges in enforcing lockdowns and social distancing measures.
Disruption of Supply Chains: Both scenarios result in disruptions to supply chains and essential services. In "World War Z," the zombie outbreak leads to disruptions in food production, transportation, and distribution, causing shortages of essential goods and services. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were disruptions to global supply chains, shortages of medical supplies, and challenges in maintaining essential services due to lockdowns and restrictions on movement.
Economic Fallout: The fragility of civilization is also evident in the economic fallout of both scenarios. In "World War Z," the global economy collapses as countries divert resources to combat the zombie outbreak, leading to widespread unemployment, poverty, and economic instability. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were severe economic repercussions, with businesses closing, job losses, and recessions triggered by lockdowns and reduced consumer spending.
Strain on Healthcare Systems: Both situations place immense strain on healthcare systems. In "World War Z," hospitals are overwhelmed by the influx of zombie bite victims, leading to shortages of medical supplies and personnel. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals faced unprecedented challenges in treating patients infected with the coronavirus, with shortages of ICU beds, ventilators, and healthcare workers contributing to the crisis.
Social Dislocation and Isolation: The fragility of civilization is exacerbated by social dislocation and isolation in both scenarios. In "World War Z," survivors are forced to flee urban centers and seek refuge in remote areas or makeshift shelters, leading to a breakdown of social cohesion and isolation. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, lockdowns, quarantines, and social distancing measures resulted in feelings of isolation and loneliness as people were separated from their loved ones and social support networks.
Global Cooperation and Resilience: Despite the challenges, both situations also highlight the importance of global cooperation and resilience in confronting existential threats. In "World War Z," nations come together to coordinate a global response to the zombie outbreak, sharing resources, expertise, and technology to combat the pandemic. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were collaborative efforts between countries to develop vaccines, share scientific knowledge, and support one another in the fight against the coronavirus, demonstrating humanity's ability to unite in the face of adversity.

By examining these parallels, we can gain insight into the fragility of civilization in both fictional and real-world contexts, as well as the universal themes of survival, resilience, and human nature that emerge in times of crisis.

In 7 ways, compare the fragility of civilization in Cormac McCarthy's novel The Road and the COVID pandemic.

ChatGPT

Certainly, here are seven ways to compare the fragility of civilization in Cormac McCarthy's novel "The Road" and the COVID-19 pandemic:

Breakdown of Infrastructure: In both "The Road" and during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a breakdown of critical infrastructure. In the novel, this is portrayed through the collapse of transportation systems, communication networks, and access to basic resources. Similarly, during the pandemic, we witnessed disruptions to supply chains, healthcare systems, and public services due to lockdowns and the spread of the virus.
Scarcity of Resources: Both scenarios depict a scarcity of resources essential for survival. In "The Road," characters struggle to find food, water, and shelter in a barren landscape. Similarly, during the pandemic, there were shortages of essential goods such as medical supplies, personal protective equipment, and even basic groceries due to panic buying and disruptions to production and distribution channels.
Erosion of Social Structures: The collapse of social structures and norms is evident in both contexts. In "The Road," societal institutions have disintegrated, leading to a breakdown of law and order, while in the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a disruption of social gatherings, economic activities, and educational institutions as governments implemented lockdowns and social distancing measures.
Threat of Violence and Desperation: Both situations create an atmosphere of fear, violence, and desperation. In "The Road," characters face threats from roving bands of cannibals and other survivors willing to resort to extreme measures to ensure their own survival. Similarly, during the pandemic, there were instances of civil unrest, hoarding, and price gouging as people reacted to the uncertainty and perceived threats to their well-being.
Isolation and Loneliness: The sense of isolation and loneliness is palpable in both scenarios. In "The Road," the father and son traverse a desolate landscape devoid of other human beings, leading to feelings of profound isolation and alienation. Similarly, during the pandemic, many people experienced social isolation due to lockdowns, quarantines, and restrictions on gatherings, leading to mental health challenges such as depression and anxiety.
Questions of Ethics and Morality: Both contexts raise questions about ethics and morality in extreme circumstances. In "The Road," characters face moral dilemmas as they struggle to survive while maintaining their humanity in a brutal world. Similarly, during the pandemic, there were ethical debates surrounding issues such as resource allocation, triage protocols, and individual freedoms versus public health measures.
Resilience and Adaptation: Despite the challenges, both situations also highlight the resilience and adaptability of human beings. In "The Road," the father and son demonstrate remarkable resilience in the face of adversity, finding moments of beauty and connection amidst the devastation. Similarly, during the COVID-19 pandemic, communities came together to support one another, frontline workers showed extraordinary courage and dedication, and scientific advancements led to the development of vaccines in record time, showcasing humanity's ability to persevere in the face of crisis.

Posted at 01:47 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

04/18/2024

Revised & Polished Essay Prompts for Fall 2024

Revised & Polished Essay Prompts for Fall 2024

1A Essay 1: Is Following Your Passion Bad Career Advice?

Choice A:

In a 1,200-word essay that adheres to current MLA format and provides a minimum of 4 sources for your Works Cited page, write an argumentative essay that defends, refutes, or complicates Cal Newport’s claim from his YouTube video "Core Idea: Don't Follow Your Passion," his online article “The Passion Trap” and "The Career Craftsman Manifesto" and Ali Adbaal's YouTube video "Follow Your Passion Is Bad Advice. Here's Why" that the career advice to follow your passion is dangerous and should be replaced by the craftsman mindset. Be sure to have a counterargument-rebuttal paragraph before your conclusion. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

1A Essay 2: Frederick Douglass Champions the Real Version of African-American History

Choice A: Frederick Douglass Lifted Others Out of the Sunken Place

In recent years, there have been critics of teaching slavery, Jim Crow and racial injustice in the classroom. These critics claim that such teachings have degenerated into biased and extremist political ideology that is intended to indoctrinate students into an anti-American mindset with America painted as the unredeemable devil; that this anti-American mindset encourages helplessness and victimization, and that this mindset has corrupted educational institutions so that rather than teach critical thinking, they foster “Woke” political indoctrination. However, some will counter argue that such renditions of African-American history are a perversion of real African-American history, which through ignorance or malice twist the essence of African-American history in order to attack it and silence African-American voices. These defenders of African-American history will posit that while it's true there are political dimensions to the study of African-American history, there are also spiritual, psychological, and spiritual dimensions. To truly understand African-American history, we must look to Frederick Douglass whose writings were designed to uplift the oppressed from what Jordan Peele calls The Sunken Place. In this context, write an essay that addresses the claim that teaching about the life of Frederick Douglass is a way of learning about racial injustice that avoids the aforementioned pitfalls because Douglass’ life embodies the importance of helping others rise above the Sunken Place, bearing witness to the truth, embracing individual self-agency to resist societal injustice, fighting to redeem America, and championing the wisdom of the Ancients for our continual self-improvement.

Choice B: Frederick Douglass and the movie Black Panther Point to a Way Out of the Sunken Place

In recent years, there have been critics of teaching slavery, Jim Crow and racial injustice in the classroom. These critics claim that such teachings have degenerated into biased and extremist political ideology that is intended to indoctrinate students into an anti-American mindset with America painted as the unredeemable devil; that this anti-American mindset encourages helplessness and victimization, and that this mindset has corrupted educational institutions so that rather than teach critical thinking, they foster “Woke” political indoctrination. However, some will counter argue that such renditions of African-American history are a perversion of real African-American history, which through ignorance or malice twist the essence of African-American history in order to attack it and silence African-American voices. These defenders of African-American history will posit that while it's true there are political dimensions to the study of African-American history, there are also spiritual, psychological, and spiritual dimensions. To truly understand African-American history, we can compare the themes in the 2018 Ryan Coogler movie Black Panther and Frederick Douglass whose writings were designed to uplift the oppressed from what Jordan Peele calls The Sunken Place. In this context, write an essay that compares the way we can learn the essence of African-American history in the movie Black Panther and the writings of Frederick Douglass. This comparison should address the importance of helping others rise above the Sunken Place, bearing witness to the truth, embracing individual self-agency to resist societal injustice, fighting to redeem America, and championing the wisdom of the Ancients for our continual self-improvement so that we can find our “Inner Wakanda.” Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Choice C. Glory Vs. The Lost Cause

The Lost Cause is a perversion of African-American history, a fabrication that claims that slavery was blessed by God and that in the system of slavery, whites and blacks lived in peaceful harmony, but the evil North ruined this harmony through “Northern aggression” and the “violation of state rights.” Write an essay that addresses the claim that the 1989 movie Glory provides an effective counter-narrative to the heinous mythologies behind The Lost Cause. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Choice D. Misinformation Is the Enemy of the People

Write an essay that addresses the claim that the misinformation that fuels The Lost Cause and the misinformation that made Alex Jones liable to criminal charges as evident in the HBO Max documentary The Truth Vs. Alex Jones makes a persuasive case that misinformation is the enemy of moral decency and a liberal democracy. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

1A Essay 3: How Social Media Is Manipulating Us

Choice A

Using as your sources the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma, Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid," and Sherry Turkle’s Ted Talk video “Connected But Not Alone," write a 1,200-word essay that explains the "nosedive" or mental breakdown of Lacie Pound in the Black Mirror episode "Nosedive." Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Choice B

Comparing the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma and Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid,"write a 1,200-word essay that addresses the claim that technology is dehumanizing us by manipulating us with cheap and easy dopamine and other insidious techniques that leave us emotionally and spiritually impoverished. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

1A Essay 4: The Sunken Place

Choice A: Defining the Sunken Place

In a 1,200-word essay with 5 sources, write an extended definition of the Sunken Place. For your definition, draw from Jordan Peele's movie Get Out, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, and Childish Gambino's video "This Is America." Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Choice B: Resisting the Sunken Place

The Sunken Place can be defined as a place of depression and demoralization to the point of paralysis often as the result of racist stereotyping. In this context, write an essay that compares the way Chris Washington in the movie Get Out resists the Sunken Place to the way Frederick Douglass overcomes his own Sunken Place. Consider the following: Both have developed personalities with a strong point of view, a strong articulation of their point of view, and the kind of self-agency and self-worth that make any attempt to enslave or oppress them a near impossibility. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Choice C: Comparing Get Out and American Fiction

The Sunken Place can be defined as a place of depression and demoralization to the point of paralysis often as the result of racist stereotyping. In this context, write an essay that compares and contrasts the Sunken Place in Jordan Peele’s movie Get Out with Cord Jefferson’s movie American Fiction. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

***

1C Essay 1: Is Losing Weight a Fool’s Errand? And Interrogating the Fantasies of Amanda Knox and Elizabeth Holmes

Choice A: Is Losing Weight the Domain of the Rich?

Consider the difficulty of losing weight as argued in Harriet Brown’s essay “The Weight of the Evidence” and Sandra Aamodt’s essay “Why You Can’t Lose Weight on a Diet”; consider the advantages of having disposable income to have access to Ozempic and similar drugs (look at author Johann Hari’s book Magic Pill, for example). Then write a 1,200-word argumentative essay that addresses the claim “losing weight and keeping it off is the domain of the rich.” In other words, can we rely on self-agency, nutrition literacy, and self-discipline, regardless of our economic standing, to control our weight, or is weight management governed by economic forces we cannot control? Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Choice B: Choice B. Interrogating Fantasy Narratives of Amanda Knox and Elizabeth Holmes

Analyze the witch-hunt-like persecution in the Netflix documentary Amanda Knox in which a young woman is victimized by a misogynistic legal system and a media enterprise that relies on misogynistic fantasies to sell a murder trial as salacious entertainment. Then analyze the rise and fall of grifter Elizabeth Holmes in the HBO Max documentary The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley in which Holmes sells herself as a super tech savior come to save the world. Then write a 1,200-word essay titled, “Fantasies of the Femme Fatale Archetype and the Tech Super Savior" in which you explore the way fantasies misled the public, resulting in mass deception, chaos, injustice, and ruined lives. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 credible sources. You can include the assigned movies as 2 of the sources.

1C Essay 2: “Winter Dreams”

Choice A: “Winter Dreams” and Magical Thinking

Analyzing the therapist and best-selling author Phil Stutz's notion of magical thinking, write a 1,200-word essay that analyzes the manner in which Dexter Green from the short story “Winter Dreams” squanders his existence by obsessing over his all-consuming chimera Judy Jones. Because this essay is an analysis and not an argument, there is no counterargument-rebuttal section. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 credible sources. You can use my Canvas modules for your sources.

Choice B: “Winter Dreams” and Homecoming King: Centripetal Vs. Centrifugal Character Development

Centripetal character development can be defined as a character beginning with a maladaptive character trait at the beginning of the story or movie. As the story or movie progresses, the character’s undesirable personality traits intensify more and more until he is consumed by his inner psychological malignancy. In contrast, centrifugal character development can be defined as a character having limitations and impediments to his moral growth at the beginning of the story or movie. As the character engages with conflicts in the story or movie, he goes through a transformation so that he is a radically changed man, usually for the better. In this context, write a 1,200-word essay that addresses the claim that “Winter Dreams” by F. Scott Fitzgerald and the Netflix comedy special Homecoming King present us with radically different iterations of grand ambition. Analyze the causes behind Dexter Green’s ambition as a source of his centripetal character development. Then analyze Hasan Minhaj’s ambition and changing attitudes toward Bethany Reed as a study in centrifugal character development. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 credible sources. You can use my Canvas modules as sources.

Choice C: Comparing Ambition in “Winter Dreams” with the 3-Part Docuseries Arnold:

Centripetal character development can be defined as a character beginning with a maladaptive character trait at the beginning of the story or movie. As the story or movie progresses, the character’s undesirable personality traits intensify more and more until he is consumed by his inner psychological malignancy. In contrast, centrifugal character development can be defined as a character having limitations and impediments to his moral growth at the beginning of the story or movie. As the character engages with conflicts in the story or movie, he goes through a transformation so that he is a radically changed man, usually for the better. In this context, write a 1,200-word essay that addresses the claim that “Winter Dreams” by F. Scott Fitzgerald and the Netflix documentary Arnold present us with radically different iterations of grand ambition. Analyze the causes behind Dexter Green’s ambition as a source of his centripetal character development. Then analyze Arnold Schwarzenegger’s ambition as a study in centrifugal character development. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 credible sources. You can use my Canvas modules as sources.

1C Essay 3: FOMO and the Manipulation of Young People, Consumer Body Shaming; and When Is It Okay for a Comedian to Lie?

Choice A: FOMO and the Manipulation of Young People

Read Derek Thompson’s essay “How Anxiety Became Content” and watch the documentary Brandy Hellville and the Cult of Fast Fashion (HBO Max). Then 1,200-word essay that addresses the way the essay and the documentary show how young people are manipulated by FOMO (fear of missing out), a pathologized notion of anxiety, a pathologized notion of fashion, herd behavior, peer pressure, social status, and how the marketing of extremes is used to exploit, manipulate, and abuse young people. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 credible sources. You can use my Canvas modules as sources.

For paragraph 1, write about how you were once manipulated into doing something as a result of desiring belonging, social status, and FOMO.

For paragraph 2, summarize the major points in Thompson’s essay and the documentary.

For paragraph 3, your all-important thesis paragraph, write a claim that compares the manner in which social influencers market exaggerated maladies and Brandy Melville markets pathologized fashion resulting in a toxic, self-destructive culture.

In terms of structure, your thesis might look something like this:

“How Anxiety Became Content” and Brandy Hellville expose a toxic culture that manipulates and exploits young people by unscrupulously relying on _________________, _________________, _________________, and _____________________________, _________________________

Your body paragraphs, 4-8, would expound on the mapping components represented by the blank spaces that follow the above thesis structure.

Because this essay is analyzing the causes of toxic culture and is more of an analysis essay than it is argumentative, there is no counterargument-rebuttal section.

Paragraph 9, your conclusion, is a powerful restatement of your thesis.

Your last page is your Works Cited page in MLA format. You need 4 sources, the documentary, Thompson’s essay, and at least one of my modules from Canvas.

1C Essay 4 Cultural Appreciation Vs.Cultural Appropriation

Our fourth essay will be an argumentative essay that defends, refutes, or complicates food and culture writer Gustavo Arellano’s claim in his essay “Let White People Appropriate Mexican Food” and elsewhere that in the realm of food, especially Mexican food, we must step away from the Cult of Authenticity and embrace the idea that the greatness of Mexican food is related to its constant evolution from stealing, borrowing, synthesizing, and even culturally appropriating from one ethnic culture to another and that cuisines that fail to evolve lack relevance and vitality.

In this context, write an argumentative essay that defends, refutes, or complicates the claim by food and culture writer Gustavo Arellano in his essay “Let White People Appropriate Mexican Food” and elsewhere that in the realm of food, especially Mexican food, we must step away from the Cult of Authenticity and embrace the idea that the greatness of Mexican food is related to its constant evolution from stealing, borrowing, synthesizing, and even culturally appropriating from one ethnic culture to another and that cuisines that fail to evolve lack relevance and vitality.

Sample Outline:

Paragraph 1: Summarize the main ideas in the article by Gustavo Arellano titled “Let White People Appropriate Mexican Food.” Or summarize the main ideas in the YouTube video “Cultural Appropriation Tastes Damn Good.”

Paragraph 2: Then transition to an argumentative claim in which you show support or repudiation of Arellano’s main ideas.

Paragraphs 3-6 would be your supporting paragraphs.

Paragraphs 7 and 8 would be your counterargument-rebuttal.

Paragraph 9 would be a powerful restatement of your thesis, which is your conclusion.

Your last page would be your Works Cited page in MLA format and a minimum of 4 sources.

***

Choice B

The Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma shows how we are manipulated and dehumanized so that metaphorically we turn into zombies with our brains intoxicated by the liquor of cheap dopamine. Write a 1,200 word essay that shows how The Social Dilemma compares this zombie state to that of the virus in the 2013 movie World War Z. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 credible sources. You can use my Canvas modules as sources.

Sample Outline:

Paragraph 1: Summarize the ways we become dehumanized by social media according to The Social Dilemma.

Paragraph 2, your thesis: Argue that the "zombie state" in The Social Dilemma compares to the 2013 movie World War Z in 5 ways, making the movie an allegory of a global digital society dissolved into mindless chaos as the result of a pandemic.

Paragraphs 3-7, your body paragraphs expound on the comparison points.

Paragraph 8, your conclusion, is a dramatic restatement of your thesis.

For comparison ideas, I put the following prompt in ChatGPT:

The documentary The Social Dilemma shows how we are manipulated and dehumanized so that metaphorically we turn into zombies. Present 5 ways The Social Dilemma compares this zombie state to that of the virus in the 2013 movie World War Z.

ChatGPT

"The Social Dilemma" and "World War Z" both offer chilling perspectives on the loss of agency and autonomy within society. Here are five ways they compare the metaphorical zombie state portrayed in both narratives:

Infectious Behavior Spread: Just as the virus spreads rapidly in "World War Z," the addictive and manipulative algorithms portrayed in "The Social Dilemma" spread throughout society, infecting individuals with behaviors that mimic those around them. Much like how the virus in the movie turns people into mindless zombies, the addictive nature of social media algorithms can turn users into passive consumers, devoid of critical thinking skills.
Loss of Individuality: In "World War Z," individuals lose their sense of self and become part of a mindless horde. Similarly, "The Social Dilemma" depicts how social media platforms gather vast amounts of personal data to tailor content and advertisements, leading to a loss of individuality as users are bombarded with targeted messaging designed to influence their thoughts and behaviors.
Mob Mentality and Groupthink: Both narratives explore the dangers of mob mentality and groupthink. In "World War Z," the infected move as a single, frenzied mass, while in "The Social Dilemma," online communities can become echo chambers where dissenting voices are silenced, leading to a collective mindset that stifles critical thinking and reinforces polarized viewpoints.
Manipulation by External Forces: In "World War Z," the virus manipulates individuals to serve its own destructive purposes. Similarly, "The Social Dilemma" reveals how social media platforms manipulate user behavior to maximize engagement and profit, often at the expense of users' well-being and autonomy.
Struggle for Control: Both narratives depict a struggle for control over one's own mind and actions. In "World War Z," survivors fight to maintain their humanity amidst the chaos of the zombie apocalypse. Likewise, "The Social Dilemma" highlights the importance of awareness and critical thinking in resisting the manipulative tactics employed by social media platforms to control users' attention and behavior.

These comparisons underscore the powerful parallels between the metaphorical zombie state portrayed in "The Social Dilemma" and the viral outbreak in "World War Z," both of which serve as cautionary tales about the dangers of relinquishing control to external forces.

***

Variation of the Above with COVID Pandemic Factor Added

The documentary The Social Dilemma shows how we are manipulated and dehumanized so that metaphorically we turn into zombies. This dehumanization worsened during the COVID pandemic when we fell deeper down various social media platforms. Present 5 ways The Social Dilemma compares this zombie state to that of the virus in the 2013 movie World War Z and the zombie state during the COVID pandemic.

ChatGPT

Certainly, "The Social Dilemma" offers a compelling narrative on how social media platforms manipulate users and foster a sense of detachment from reality, akin to a metaphorical "zombie" state. Here are five ways this comparison can be drawn between the themes explored in "The Social Dilemma," the zombie apocalypse depicted in "World War Z," and the societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic:

Contagious Behavior: Just as the virus spreads rapidly in "World War Z," the addictive nature of social media content spreads swiftly among users, influencing their behavior and thoughts. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this spread was exacerbated as people spent more time online, leading to a proliferation of misinformation and echo chambers that further detached individuals from reality.
Loss of Autonomy: In both scenarios, individuals lose their autonomy and become slaves to their impulses. In "The Social Dilemma," algorithms tailor content to manipulate user behavior, while in "World War Z," the infected lose control of their actions to the virus. Similarly, during the pandemic, excessive reliance on social media led to a loss of critical thinking skills and independent decision-making as individuals became consumed by online narratives.
Dehumanization: The dehumanization of individuals is a central theme in both narratives. In "World War Z," the infected lose their humanity as they succumb to the virus, while in "The Social Dilemma," users are reduced to data points and targeted for profit without regard for their well-being. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the depersonalization of individuals online contributed to polarization and divisiveness, further eroding empathy and understanding.
Erosion of Social Fabric: Both scenarios illustrate the erosion of societal norms and institutions. In "World War Z," the collapse of governments and social order leads to chaos and anarchy, while in "The Social Dilemma," the breakdown of authentic human connections in favor of virtual interactions undermines social cohesion. Similarly, the isolation and disconnection fostered by the pandemic exacerbated feelings of alienation and distrust within communities.
Overcoming the Threat: Despite the bleakness of their respective situations, both narratives offer hope for redemption. In "World War Z," the protagonist seeks a cure to halt the spread of the virus and restore humanity, while in "The Social Dilemma," awareness of the manipulative tactics employed by social media platforms sparks a movement for change. Likewise, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, efforts to combat misinformation and promote digital literacy have emerged as crucial steps towards reclaiming agency and rebuilding trust in online spaces.

***

Show 5 ways the virus in the 2013 World War Z is a metaphor for the kind of mental virus that is dehumanizing us as explored in Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid."

ChatGPT

Certainly, here are five ways in which the virus depicted in the 2013 novel "World War Z" serves as a metaphor for the kind of mental virus that dehumanizes individuals, as explored in Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid":

Infectious Spread and Polarization:
- The virus in "World War Z" spreads rapidly and indiscriminately, infecting individuals across all demographics.
- Similarly, the ideological "viruses" discussed by Haidt, such as political polarization and tribalism, have spread widely in American society, leading to increased division and animosity between different groups.
Loss of Individuality and Groupthink:
- Once infected in "World War Z," individuals lose their sense of self and individuality, becoming mindless drones driven solely by the virus's agenda.
- Likewise, Haidt observes a trend towards conformity and groupthink in modern American society, where individuals adhere rigidly to ideological narratives at the expense of critical thinking and independent judgment.
Dehumanization and Othering:
- Infected individuals in "World War Z" lose their humanity, viewing non-infected humans as "other" and often resorting to violence against them.
- Similarly, Haidt discusses how ideological polarization has led to dehumanization of political opponents, with individuals demonizing those who hold different beliefs as enemies rather than fellow citizens.
Erosion of Empathy and Compassion:
- The virus in "World War Z" erodes empathy and compassion among infected individuals, leading to acts of cruelty and violence against others.
- Similarly, Haidt highlights how ideological "viruses" can diminish empathy and compassion in society, as individuals prioritize loyalty to their group over concern for the well-being of others.
Destructive Consequences and Societal Collapse:
- In "World War Z," the spread of the virus ultimately leads to societal collapse, with widespread chaos, violence, and loss of life.
- Similarly, Haidt warns of the destructive consequences of unchecked ideological polarization, including societal breakdown and the erosion of democratic norms and institutions.

***

The 2013 movie World War Z is not just a prophecy about the Covid pandemic. It’s a prophecy about how the Covid pandemic put people in an internet crucible in which they got drunk on the liquor of cheap dopamine and were dehumanized and “zombified.” Present 7 examples of how this aforementioned prophecy was fulfilled.

ChatGPT

Comparing the themes of "World War Z" to the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic reveals several striking parallels, showcasing how the film's portrayal of a global crisis resonates with aspects of our contemporary reality. Here are seven examples illustrating how the prophecy was fulfilled:

Information Overload and Panic: In "World War Z," the rapid spread of the zombie virus leads to widespread panic and misinformation. Similarly, during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the flood of conflicting information and rumors on social media platforms contributed to heightened anxiety and confusion among the public.
Dopamine-driven Behavior: The film portrays individuals succumbing to impulsive and reckless behavior in their pursuit of survival, often driven by the adrenaline rush of facing imminent danger. Similarly, during the pandemic, people turned to social media and online entertainment as a form of escapism, seeking instant gratification and dopamine hits through likes, shares, and viral content.
Dehumanization and Polarization: As society grapples with the zombie outbreak in "World War Z," there is a breakdown of social cohesion, leading to the dehumanization of both infected and uninfected individuals. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated existing societal divisions, fueling hostility and polarization between those advocating for public health measures and those resisting them.
Digital Echo Chambers: The internet serves as a breeding ground for conspiracy theories and extremist ideologies in the film, amplifying fear and distrust among the population. Similarly, the pandemic fueled the proliferation of misinformation and conspiracy theories online, leading to the formation of echo chambers where individuals reinforce their preexisting beliefs without critical evaluation.
Economic Disruption and Inequality: "World War Z" portrays the collapse of global economies and widespread unemployment as a consequence of the zombie outbreak. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic triggered significant economic disruption, exacerbating inequalities and disproportionately impacting vulnerable populations, including low-income workers and marginalized communities.
Governmental Response and Accountability: The film depicts the challenges governments face in coordinating an effective response to the crisis amidst bureaucratic inefficiencies and political infighting. Similarly, the pandemic exposed shortcomings in governmental preparedness and response, leading to debates over accountability and the effectiveness of public health measures.
Resilience and Adaptation: Despite the chaos and devastation depicted in "World War Z," the film also highlights humanity's capacity for resilience and adaptation in the face of adversity. Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic has inspired acts of solidarity and innovation, as communities come together to support one another and adapt to new ways of living and working in a post-pandemic world.

By examining these parallels between "World War Z" and the COVID-19 pandemic, we can gain insights into the societal and psychological challenges posed by global crises and the importance of resilience, solidarity, and critical thinking in navigating uncertain times.

***

Compare 7 points of dehumanization in the Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma and Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid."

ChatGPT

Certainly, let's compare seven points of dehumanization evident in both "The Social Dilemma" and Jonathan Haidt's essay "Why the Past 10 Years of American Life Have Been Uniquely Stupid."

Surveillance and Manipulation:
- In "The Social Dilemma," social media platforms surveil users' behavior and manipulate their feeds to maximize engagement and profit.
- Haidt's essay touches on how social media algorithms prioritize sensationalist content, fueling outrage and division for clicks and views. This manipulation undermines genuine discourse and fosters polarization.
Algorithmic Bias:
- "The Social Dilemma" discusses how algorithms reinforce biases by showing users content that aligns with their existing beliefs, leading to echo chambers.
- Haidt highlights how social media amplifies tribalism by presenting selective information, perpetuating stereotypes, and eroding empathy for those with differing viewpoints.
Addiction and Dopamine Response:
- Both the documentary and Haidt's essay explore how social media platforms exploit users' psychological vulnerabilities to foster addiction and drive engagement.
- They both argue that the constant dopamine hits from likes, shares, and notifications can lead to diminished attention spans and addictive behavior, dehumanizing individuals by reducing them to mere sources of attention.
Mental Health Impact:
- "The Social Dilemma" discusses the detrimental effects of social media on mental health, including increased rates of anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem.
- Haidt's essay suggests that the constant exposure to negative news and outrage culture on social media contributes to a culture of fear and pessimism, dehumanizing individuals by undermining their sense of security and well-being.
Loss of Authenticity:
- Both "The Social Dilemma" and Haidt's essay argue that social media encourages individuals to present curated, idealized versions of themselves, leading to a loss of authenticity and genuine connection.
- They suggest that this emphasis on perfection and comparison dehumanizes individuals by eroding their sense of identity and self-worth.
Polarization and Tribalism:
- Both sources explore how social media exacerbates societal divisions by amplifying extreme viewpoints and fostering tribalistic behavior.
- They argue that this polarization dehumanizes individuals by reducing complex issues to simplistic narratives and fostering hostility towards those with differing opinions.
Manipulation of Reality:
- "The Social Dilemma" highlights how social media distorts reality by promoting curated images and narratives, leading to unrealistic expectations and feelings of inadequacy.
- Haidt's essay suggests that the constant exposure to sensationalist news and viral misinformation on social media blurs the line between fact and fiction, undermining trust in institutions and dehumanizing individuals by eroding their sense of reality.

These comparisons illustrate how both "The Social Dilemma" and Haidt's essay identify various forms of dehumanization perpetuated by social media and its impact on society.

***

To truly understand African-American history, we must look to Frederick Douglass whose writings were designed to uplift the oppressed from what Jordan Peele calls The Sunken Place. In this context, provide 7 examples to support the claim that teaching about the life of Frederick Douglass is a way of learning about racial injustice that embodies the importance of helping others rise above the Sunken Place, bearing witness to the truth, embracing individual self-agency to resist societal injustice, fighting to redeem America, and championing the wisdom of the Ancients for our continual self-improvement.

ChatGPT

Uplifting the Oppressed: Frederick Douglass's life story serves as a beacon of hope and resilience for those facing oppression. Born into slavery, Douglass endured unimaginable hardships but ultimately liberated himself through education and activism. His narrative demonstrates the transformative power of knowledge and self-determination, inspiring generations to rise above adversity.
Escaping the Sunken Place: Jordan Peele's concept of "The Sunken Place" in his film "Get Out" symbolizes a state of psychological captivity and subjugation. Douglass's writings, particularly his autobiographies like "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave," provide a roadmap for breaking free from societal constraints and reclaiming one's agency. By sharing his experiences, Douglass invites readers to confront the reality of oppression and challenge systems of injustice.
Bearing Witness to Truth: Douglass was a fearless truth-teller who exposed the brutal realities of slavery and racism. His speeches and writings, such as his famous Fourth of July address, unflinchingly confronted America's hypocrisy and demanded justice for all people. Studying Douglass's work enables students to confront uncomfortable truths about the nation's past while inspiring them to advocate for a more equitable future.
Embracing Individual Self-Agency: Despite facing insurmountable odds, Douglass refused to succumb to despair or resignation. Instead, he seized every opportunity to assert his humanity and challenge the status quo. Through his actions, Douglass exemplified the power of individual agency in effecting meaningful change. His life teaches us that even in the face of overwhelming oppression, each person possesses the capacity to resist and overcome.
Fighting to Redeem America: Douglass believed in the promise of America, even as he condemned its failures to live up to its ideals. He tirelessly advocated for the abolition of slavery, suffrage for women, and equal rights for all citizens. Douglass's activism embodied the belief that America could only fulfill its potential by confronting its history of injustice and striving towards a more inclusive society.
Championing the Wisdom of the Ancients: Douglass was a voracious reader and intellectual who drew inspiration from classical literature and philosophy. His speeches often referenced ancient Greek and Roman thinkers, demonstrating his appreciation for the timeless wisdom found in their writings. By integrating these insights into his advocacy, Douglass emphasized the universality of human rights and the enduring relevance of moral principles across cultures and epochs.
Continual Self-Improvement: Douglass's life was a testament to the power of continual self-improvement and lifelong learning. Despite achieving remarkable success as an abolitionist leader, he remained humble and committed to personal growth. Douglass's journey from bondage to freedom illustrates the transformative potential of education and self-reflection. By studying his life and legacy, students are encouraged to embark on their own paths of discovery and self-empowerment.

***

During the COVID pandemic, society became even more polarized, radicalized, and open to grand conspiracies. The accretion of these developments had a dehumanizing effect on people. Elaborate on these themes by comparing 7 points of dehumanization resulting from the COVID pandemic to the "zombification" and world chaos evident in the 2013 movie World War Z.

ChatGPT

In the crucible of the COVID-19 pandemic, societal fissures deepened, fostering a landscape ripe for polarization, radicalization, and the proliferation of grand conspiracies. This tumultuous terrain was not merely a stage for ideological clashes but also an arena where the human essence seemed to erode, giving rise to a disturbing array of dehumanizing phenomena. Drawing parallels to the "zombification" and global chaos depicted in the 2013 film "World War Z," we can discern seven points of convergence where the dehumanizing effects of the pandemic echo the chaos of a world overrun by the undead:

Othering and Stigmatization: Just as survivors in "World War Z" faced the dehumanizing reality of viewing their infected counterparts as soulless threats, the pandemic exacerbated tendencies to "other" and stigmatize certain groups. Whether through scapegoating ethnic minorities, vilifying frontline workers, or ostracizing those who contracted the virus, societies witnessed a troubling surge in dehumanizing rhetoric and behavior.
Information Warfare and Disinformation: In both the pandemic reality and the fictional world of "World War Z," the dissemination of misinformation and propaganda fueled confusion and fear. Just as the spread of false narratives in the movie led to societal breakdown, the deluge of conspiracy theories and misleading information during the pandemic undermined trust in institutions, eroding the bonds of shared reality and fostering a climate of suspicion and paranoia.
Erosion of Empathy and Solidarity: The breakdown of social cohesion portrayed in "World War Z" finds parallels in the erosion of empathy and solidarity witnessed during the pandemic. As individuals and communities grappled with the strain of lockdowns, economic hardship, and loss, empathy fatigue set in, giving way to a callous indifference to the suffering of others and a prioritization of self-preservation over collective well-being.
Weaponization of Fear and Anxiety: Just as fear served as a potent weapon in the arsenal of those seeking to exploit chaos in "World War Z," the pandemic provided fertile ground for the weaponization of fear and anxiety. From political leaders leveraging public anxiety to advance their agendas to extremist groups capitalizing on societal unrest to recruit new adherents, fear became a tool for manipulation, further fracturing society along ideological fault lines.
Dehumanization in Digital Spaces: The digital realm, portrayed as a battleground for survival in "World War Z," mirrored the pandemic's digital landscape, where dehumanization flourished unchecked. Online echo chambers amplified extremist views, while the anonymity afforded by screens emboldened individuals to unleash vitriol and hate with impunity, further eroding the boundaries of civil discourse and empathy.
Economic Exploitation and Inequality: In both the pandemic reality and the apocalyptic world of "World War Z," economic disparities deepened, exacerbating existing inequalities and widening the chasm between the haves and the have-nots. As corporations capitalized on crisis-driven demand and governments prioritized economic recovery over social welfare, marginalized communities bore the brunt of exploitation and neglect, their humanity reduced to mere collateral in the pursuit of profit.
Desensitization to Violence and Suffering: Finally, just as the relentless onslaught of zombie hordes in "World War Z" desensitized survivors to violence and suffering, the relentless barrage of grim statistics and harrowing images during the pandemic threatened to numb societies to the human toll of the crisis. As the death toll climbed and scenes of despair became commonplace, there was a risk of succumbing to a collective desensitization, where human tragedy became little more than background noise in the daily cacophony of news cycles.

In essence, the COVID-19 pandemic and the dystopian chaos of "World War Z" serve as cautionary tales, reminding us of the fragility of our humanity in the face of existential threats. By recognizing and confronting the dehumanizing forces at play, we can strive to rebuild a society grounded in empathy, solidarity, and a shared commitment to preserving our common humanity.

Choice B:

In a 1,200 word essay, address the claim that the Netflix movie The Founder, about the rise of McDonald’s Fast-Food King Ray Kroc, is a cautionary tale about following Cal Newport’s notion of the craftsman mindset without a moral compass. Be sure to have a Works Cited page in MLA format with 4 sources.

Posted at 11:39 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)

04/14/2024

New Essay Prompts: Food, Inc. 2, Her and Eternal Sunshine, Lost Cause, Glory, Alex Jones, Kroc, The Graduate, Sunken Place

English 1A:

One. Newport and Kroc (craft without morals)

Two. Frederick Douglass, Black Panther, Lionel Richie's "Sweet Love," Northstar, Lost Cause and Alex Jones or Lost Cause and Glory

Three. Compare The Social Dilemma or "Nosedive" to Haidt "Stupid" essay and 2 essays from The New Yorker or The Atlantic (listed below): Write a thesis about manipulation and "dumbing down."

Four. Sunken Place 4 options

***

English 1C

One. Food, Inc. 2 and Ozempic (Johann Hari)

Two. Choice A. When Is It Okay for a Comedian to Lie?

Responding to the New Yorker article “Hasan Minhaj’s ‘Emotional Truths,’” many critics have argued that Hasan Minhaj doesn’t get a pass for his lies like other comedians for several reasons. One, in the context of his stories, Minhaj is asking us to believe in their literal truth. Two, he is not a pure comedian. Rather, he presents himself as a hybrid of a comedian and a journalist who wants to drive home political messages. Three, he tells lies about real people, which puts a target on their backs and shows his reckless disregard for their wellbeing for the service of his political messages and self-aggrandizement. Four, by telling lies about racist incidents and bigotry, he is making it more difficult for people to be believed when these real incidents occur. In the context of these criticisms, write an argumentative essay that addresses the claim that Hasan Minhaj’s lies have crossed moral boundaries and have compromised his career as a beloved comedian. Be sure to interrogate Hasan Minhaj’s defenses of his lying to make “emotional truths” in his YouTube video “My Response to The New Yorker article.” Finally, be sure to have a counterargument-rebuttal section. Conclude your essay with a MLA-format Works Cited page with a minimum of 4 sources.

Two. Choice B. Interrogating Fantasy Narratives of Amanda Knox and Elizabeth Holmes

Analyze the witch-hunt-like persecution in the Netflix documentary Amanda Knox in which a young woman is victimized by a misogynistic legal system and a media enterprise that relies on misogynistic fantasies to sell a murder trial as salacious entertainment. Then analyze the rise and fall of grifter Elizabeth Holmes in the HBO Max documentary The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley in which Holmes sells herself as a super tech savior come to save the world. Then write an essay titled, “Fantasies of the Femme Fatale Archetype and the Tech Super Savior" in which you explore the way fantasies misled the public, resulting in mass deception, chaos, injustice, and ruined lives.

Three. Choice A: Brandy Hellville and White Hot or Choice B: Her, Eternal Sunshine, Sherry Turkle (pick at least 2 of the 4)

Four. Mexican food

Write an essay that supports, refutes, or complicates the claim that the documentary Food, Inc. 2 and the pervasive use of Ozempic and related drugs show that weight management is more dependent on economic power and industrial manipulation than a matter of self-discipline and self-agency.

Write an essay that addresses the claim that the movie Her (2013), the movie Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004), the Netflix Black Mirror episode “Nosedive,” and Sherry Turkle’s Ted Talk video “Connected But Not Alone” are evidence that technology is dehumanizing us by manipulating us to replace human connection and natural suffering with superficial connections that leave us emotionally and spiritually impoverished.

Glory Vs. The Lost Cause:

Write an essay that addresses the claim that the 1989 movie Glory provides an effective counter-narrative to the heinous mythologies behind The Lost Cause.

Cal Newport writes that passion must be combined with a craftsman mindset. Otherwise, passion is worthless. At the same time, developing a craftsman mindset must be done within a moral framework. Otherwise, being a craftsman is a fool’s errand. In this context, write an essay that addresses the claim that the Netflix movie The Founder, about the rise of Ray Kroc, is a cautionary tale about a man who pursues the craftsman mindset but does so without a moral compass.

Phil Stutz warns us of pursuing a Moment Frozen in Time, a false ideal of perfection that has “no depth or dynamism,” but is an empty promise that dooms us to emptiness, misery, and a sense of self-betrayal. In this context, write an essay that addresses the claim that the 1967 movie The Graduate and the 2018 movie Private Life are similar in that they provide us a cautionary tale about the dangers of pursuing a Moment Frozen in Time.

Sunken Place: 4 Options

Prompt 1:

Prompt 2:

The Sunken Place can be defined as a place of depression and demoralization to the point of paralysis often as the result of racist stereotyping. In this context, write an essay that compares the way Chris Washington in the movie Get Out and Frederick Douglass overcome the Sunken Place because both have we;; developed personalities with a strong point of view, a strong articulation of their point of view, and the kind of self-agency and self-worth that make any attempt to enslave them a near impossibility.

Prompt 3

As is evident in the Jordan Peele movie Get Out, the Sunken Place can be defined as a place of depression and demoralization to the point of paralysis often as the result of racist stereotyping. In this context, write an essay that addresses the claim that Frederick Douglass overcame the Sunken Place because of the power of literacy and the manner in which language transformed Douglass into a man free from both external and internal restraints.

Prompt 4

***

Teaching Jim Crow and Racial Injustice

Essay Prompt:

In recent years, there have been critics of teaching Jim Crow and racial injustice in the classroom. These critics claim that such teachings have degenerated into biased and extremist political ideology that is intended to indoctrinate students into an anti-American mindset with America painted as the unredeemable devil; that this anti-American mindset encourages helplessness and victimization, and that this mindset has corrupted educational institutions so that rather than teach critical thinking, they foster “Woke” political indoctrination. However, some will counter argue that such renditions of African-American history are a perversion of real African-American history, which through ignorance or malice twist the essence of African-American history in order to attack it. While it's true there are political dimensions to the study of African-American history, there are also spiritual, psychological, and spiritual dimensions. To truly understand African-American history, we must look to Frederick Douglass whose writings were designed to uplift the oppressed from what Jordan Peele calls The Sunken Place. In this context, write an essay that addresses the claim that teaching about the life of Frederick Douglass is a way of learning about racial injustice that avoids the aforementioned pitfalls because Douglass’ life embodies the importance of helping others rise above the Sunken Place, bearing witness to the truth, embracing individual self-agency to resist societal injustice, fighting to redeem America, and championing the wisdom of the Ancients for our continual self-improvement.

Variation with Black Panther Comparing Black Panther to Frederick Douglass

***

Provide a list of 12 essays from The Atlantic or The New Yorker that share thematic similarities with the documentary The Social Network.

ChatGPT

Certainly! "The Social Network" explores themes such as ambition, entrepreneurship, technology, and the impact of social media on society. Here's a curated list of essays from The Atlantic and The New Yorker that share thematic similarities:

From The Atlantic:

"The Attention Economy" by Derek Thompson - Explores how social media platforms like Facebook have commodified attention and reshaped the way people interact with content, touching on themes of technology's influence on society and the economics of digital engagement.
"The Rise of the Social Media Influencer" by Taylor Lorenz - Examines the phenomenon of social media influencers and their impact on consumer culture, discussing themes of entrepreneurship, self-branding, and the blurred lines between personal and professional identity online.
"The Dark Psychology of Social Networks" by Jonathan Haidt and Tobias Rose-Stockwell - Discusses the psychological mechanisms at play in social media platforms and their effects on individual well-being and societal cohesion, addressing themes of addiction, manipulation, and the erosion of trust.
"The Cost of Connectivity" by Franklin Foer - Explores the consequences of living in a hyperconnected world, discussing themes of isolation, alienation, and the paradox of being more connected than ever while feeling increasingly disconnected from meaningful relationships and communities.
"The Internet as a Force for Good - or Evil?" by Alexis C. Madrigal - Examines the dual nature of the internet as a tool for both positive social change and negative consequences, touching on themes of technological utopianism, dystopian realities, and the complexities of navigating the digital landscape.

From The New Yorker:

"The Disruption Machine" by Jill Lepore - Critically examines the ideology of disruptive innovation and its impact on industries and society, discussing themes of entrepreneurship, technological advancement, and the mythos of the Silicon Valley startup culture.
"The Tyranny of Convenience" by Tim Wu - Explores the consequences of prioritizing convenience in the digital age, discussing themes of technological determinism, the erosion of autonomy, and the trade-offs between efficiency and human flourishing.
"The Problem with Online Dating" by Jia Tolentino - Critiques the commodification of romance and intimacy in the era of online dating apps, addressing themes of algorithmic matchmaking, gamification of relationships, and the impact of technology on modern courtship rituals.
"The Death of the Phone Call" by Megan Garber - Examines the decline of traditional phone communication in favor of text-based messaging platforms, discussing themes of intimacy, authenticity, and the changing nature of interpersonal relationships in the digital age.
"The Filter Bubble" by Eli Pariser - Explores how personalized algorithms on social media platforms create echo chambers and limit exposure to diverse perspectives, touching on themes of polarization, echo chambers, and the challenges of maintaining a shared reality in an increasingly fragmented digital landscape.
"The Illusion of Internet Freedom" by George Packer - Critically examines the idea of internet freedom and its limitations, discussing themes of censorship, surveillance, and the role of technology companies in shaping the public discourse and political landscape.
"The Mindlessness of Social Media" by Maria Konnikova - Discusses the psychological effects of social media consumption on attention, cognition, and emotional well-being, addressing themes of addiction, distraction, and the need for mindfulness in the digital age.

These essays from The Atlantic and The New Yorker offer insightful perspectives on the themes explored in "The Social Network," providing valuable commentary on the intersection of technology, entrepreneurship, and society.

***

Write an essay comparing Goodfellas and City of God that explores the contradictions of the gang providing structure and a family belonging on one hand and chaos and ruthless tribalism on the other.

ChatGPT

Title: The Paradox of Gang Dynamics: Exploring Structure, Belonging, and Chaos in "Goodfellas" and "City of God"

In both Martin Scorsese's "Goodfellas" and Fernando Meirelles' "City of God," the portrayal of organized crime gangs offers a fascinating juxtaposition of themes: on one hand, they provide structure and a sense of belonging akin to a family, while on the other hand, they are marked by chaos and ruthless tribalism. This essay delves into the contradictions inherent in these depictions, examining how these films navigate the complexities of gang dynamics.

Both films present the allure of belonging to a gang as a means of finding identity and purpose in the absence of traditional family structures. In "Goodfellas," Henry Hill is drawn into the world of organized crime at a young age, finding camaraderie and mentorship among his fellow mobsters. The mafia offers him a sense of belonging and hierarchy, with figures like Jimmy Conway and Paulie Cicero acting as surrogate fathers. Similarly, in "City of God," the characters gravitate towards gang life as a way to escape poverty and marginalization, forming tight-knit communities within the favela. The gangs provide a sense of protection and belonging, with Lil Zé and Benny assuming roles of authority and respect within their respective groups.

However, beneath the facade of camaraderie lies a darker reality of violence, betrayal, and moral decay. In both films, the pursuit of power and status within the gang leads to a breakdown of trust and loyalty. In "Goodfellas," Henry's rise through the ranks is accompanied by a trail of betrayals and bloodshed, culminating in the infamous Lufthansa heist and the unraveling of his criminal empire. Similarly, in "City of God," Lil Zé's thirst for dominance results in a reign of terror, as he eliminates anyone who dares to challenge his authority. The gangs become embroiled in a cycle of vengeance and retribution, where loyalty is a commodity easily traded for personal gain.

Moreover, the gangs in both films perpetuate a culture of chaos and lawlessness that undermines any semblance of order or stability. In "Goodfellas," the mob operates outside the bounds of society's norms, engaging in illicit activities with impunity. Despite their claims of honor and loyalty, their actions are driven by greed and self-interest, leading to a constant state of paranoia and violence. Likewise, in "City of God," the favela descends into anarchy as rival gangs vie for control, leaving a trail of destruction and despair in their wake. The pursuit of power becomes an end in itself, with little regard for the consequences or the lives destroyed in the process.

Yet, amidst the chaos and brutality, moments of humanity and redemption emerge, challenging the simplistic portrayal of gang life as inherently evil. In "Goodfellas," Henry's eventual downfall serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the fleeting nature of power and the cost of betrayal. Similarly, in "City of God," characters like Rocket and Bené offer glimmers of hope amidst the despair, striving to break free from the cycle of violence and forge a better future for themselves and their community.

In conclusion, "Goodfellas" and "City of God" offer nuanced portrayals of gang dynamics, exploring the contradictions of structure, belonging, and chaos within organized crime. While the gangs provide a sense of identity and community, they are ultimately marked by violence, betrayal, and moral decay. Yet, amidst the darkness, moments of humanity and redemption remind us of the complex interplay between good and evil, challenging us to confront the contradictions within ourselves and society at large.

Comparing the movie The Oldboy and Munich, write an essay that addresses the claim that revenge is a drug that leads to derangement, provides a theater of justice to appease others, destroys effective long-term planning, and entices us with short-term gratification.

ChatGPT

Title: The Seductive Poison of Revenge: A Comparative Analysis of "Oldboy" and "Munich"

Revenge, often portrayed as a primal instinct, can be likened to a drug that promises catharsis but ultimately leads to derangement and destruction. Park Chan-wook's "Oldboy" and Steven Spielberg's "Munich" delve into the complexities of revenge, illustrating how it serves as a theater of justice, undermines long-term planning, and offers fleeting gratification at the expense of moral decay. This essay explores these themes through a comparative lens, examining the consequences of vengeance in both films.

In "Oldboy," Oh Dae-su's obsessive quest for revenge consumes him, transforming him from a mild-mannered businessman into a relentless force of vengeance. His single-minded pursuit blinds him to the collateral damage inflicted on those around him, leading to a cascade of violence and despair. Revenge becomes his sole purpose, driving him to increasingly deranged acts as he descends into madness. The film vividly portrays how the desire for vengeance can consume a person, distorting their sense of morality and rationality.

Similarly, in "Munich," Avner's mission to avenge the deaths of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics spirals out of control, as his team becomes embroiled in a cycle of violence with no clear end in sight. Revenge becomes a theater of justice, where moral boundaries are blurred and collateral damage is justified in the name of retribution. Avner's initial sense of righteousness gives way to doubt and disillusionment, as he grapples with the moral ambiguity of his actions and the toll they take on his humanity.

Both films highlight how revenge destroys effective long-term planning, trapping its protagonists in a cycle of violence and retribution with no escape. In "Oldboy," Oh Dae-su's fixation on revenge blinds him to the larger conspiracy at play, preventing him from seeing the truth until it's too late. His tunnel vision ultimately leads to his downfall, as he becomes ensnared in a web of deception and betrayal. Similarly, in "Munich," Avner's mission becomes increasingly futile as he realizes that each act of vengeance only begets more violence, with no resolution in sight. Revenge becomes a self-perpetuating cycle, consuming its participants in a never-ending spiral of destruction.

Moreover, both films illustrate how revenge entices us with short-term gratification, offering the illusion of justice and closure while ultimately leading to moral decay. In "Oldboy," Oh Dae-su's acts of vengeance provide him with a temporary sense of satisfaction, as he believes he has finally avenged the wrongs done to him. However, this satisfaction is short-lived, as he soon realizes the emptiness and futility of his actions. Similarly, in "Munich," Avner's initial sense of purpose gives way to disillusionment and despair, as he grapples with the moral consequences of his actions and the realization that revenge offers no true solace.

In conclusion, "Oldboy" and "Munich" offer compelling portraits of the seductive poison of revenge, illustrating how it leads to derangement, provides a theater of justice to appease others, destroys effective long-term planning, and entices us with short-term gratification. Through their powerful narratives, these films serve as cautionary tales, reminding us of the corrosive effects of vengeance and the importance of seeking justice through more constructive means.

ChatGPT

Title: Fantasies of the Femme Fatale Archetype and the Tech Super Savior: Deception, Chaos, Injustice, and Ruined Lives

In the modern era of sensationalized media and tech-driven narratives, two gripping documentaries, "Amanda Knox" on Netflix and "The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley" on HBO Max, delve into the intertwined tales of two remarkable women: Amanda Knox and Elizabeth Holmes. These documentaries unveil the perilous consequences of societal fantasies, manifesting as the femme fatale archetype and the tech super savior mythos, which have ensnared the public imagination, resulting in mass deception, chaos, injustice, and ruined lives.

The Netflix documentary "Amanda Knox" exposes the witch-hunt-like persecution of a young woman entangled in a murder trial in Italy. Amanda Knox's ordeal highlights the insidious workings of a misogynistic legal system and a media frenzy fueled by sensationalism and misogyny. Knox becomes the target of a salacious narrative perpetuated by both the legal apparatus and the media enterprise, portraying her as the seductive femme fatale responsible for the tragic death of Meredith Kercher. The public's fascination with the "femme fatale" archetype, characterized by its portrayal of women as inherently deceptive and dangerous, eclipsed the pursuit of truth and justice. Knox's innocence was overshadowed by the lurid fantasies spun by the media, resulting in her wrongful conviction and years of unjust incarceration.

Similarly, in the HBO Max documentary "The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley," the rise and fall of Elizabeth Holmes unfold as a cautionary tale of deception and hubris in the tech world. Holmes fashioned herself as the embodiment of the tech super savior, promising revolutionary advancements in healthcare through her company, Theranos. With her charismatic persona and grandiose claims, Holmes captivated investors, media, and the public alike, perpetuating the myth of the visionary entrepreneur poised to revolutionize an industry. However, behind the facade of innovation lay a web of deceit and manipulation. Holmes's promises of groundbreaking technology were built on a foundation of falsehoods, leading to widespread deception, financial ruin for investors, and jeopardizing the health and well-being of countless individuals.

Both documentaries underscore the perilous allure of societal fantasies and their devastating real-world consequences. The portrayal of Knox as the femme fatale and Holmes as the tech super savior demonstrates how deeply entrenched these archetypes are in our cultural consciousness. These fantasies not only distort reality but also perpetuate systemic injustices and enable the exploitation of individuals for the sake of sensationalized narratives and financial gain.

Moreover, the documentaries shed light on the complicity of the media and the legal system in perpetuating these fantasies. Sensationalized reporting and biased legal proceedings further fuel the public's fascination with these archetypes, amplifying their destructive impact. The failure to critically examine these narratives and hold accountable those who perpetuate them perpetuates a cycle of deception and injustice, leaving behind a trail of ruined lives in its wake.

In conclusion, "Amanda Knox" and "The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley" serve as powerful indictments of the dangers posed by societal fantasies, specifically the femme fatale archetype and the tech super savior mythos. These documentaries compel us to interrogate the narratives we consume and the individuals we idolize, urging us to confront the reality behind the illusions. Only through critical thinking and skepticism can we hope to dismantle these fantasies and prevent further deception, chaos, injustice, and ruined lives.

Analyze the movie Black Panther as a celebration of African-American history that rejects partisan politics, critical race theory, and the kind of “trauma porn” that results in nihilism and victimization for a more empowering approach to African-American study, which embraces Ancient Wisdom, the rituals of a loving community, rigorous discipline dedicated to an Aspiring Self, a moral code with clear boundaries of good and evil, and group identity that is nurturing and dignified. In an essay titled, “Wakanda, the City of the Aspiring Self,” argue that Black Panther focuses on moral improvement and community building and therefore avoids getting mired in the kind of victimization and nihilism that too often diminishes the value of African-American study.

ChatGPT

Title: Wakanda, the City of the Aspiring Self: Black Panther's Celebration of African-American History and Empowerment

In the cinematic masterpiece "Black Panther," director Ryan Coogler crafts a narrative that transcends traditional narratives of African-American history, offering a refreshing departure from partisan politics, critical race theory, and narratives of victimization. Instead, "Black Panther" celebrates African-American heritage through the lens of empowerment, emphasizing themes of Ancient Wisdom, community rituals, disciplined self-improvement, and a clear moral code. In this essay, titled "Wakanda, the City of the Aspiring Self," I argue that "Black Panther" focuses on moral improvement and community building, thereby avoiding the pitfalls of victimization and nihilism that often plague African-American studies.

Central to the narrative of "Black Panther" is the fictional African nation of Wakanda, a technologically advanced society that has thrived in isolation from the rest of the world. Wakanda serves as a utopian vision of an African nation untouched by colonialism, embracing its rich cultural heritage while also embracing innovation and progress. Within Wakanda, the values of Ancient Wisdom are revered, with rituals and traditions passed down through generations. These rituals serve not only as a connection to the past but also as a source of strength and unity for the community.

Moreover, "Black Panther" portrays a society dedicated to rigorous self-discipline and moral improvement. The character of T'Challa, the titular Black Panther, exemplifies this commitment to self-betterment as he grapples with the responsibilities of leadership and the legacy of his ancestors. T'Challa's journey is one of growth and self-discovery, as he learns to navigate the complexities of power and the moral dilemmas that accompany it. His adherence to a clear moral code, guided by principles of justice, compassion, and responsibility, sets him apart as a true hero.

Additionally, "Black Panther" presents a vision of group identity that is nurturing and dignified, rejecting the divisive politics that often characterize discussions of race. In Wakanda, unity and solidarity are prized virtues, with each member of society contributing to the greater good. The film celebrates the diversity of the African diaspora, showcasing a range of cultures and traditions that coexist harmoniously within Wakandan society.

By focusing on themes of moral improvement and community building, "Black Panther" avoids the trap of victimization and nihilism that too often plagues discussions of African-American history. Rather than dwelling on past injustices or perpetuating narratives of oppression, the film offers a vision of empowerment and resilience. Through the example of Wakanda, "Black Panther" inspires audiences to embrace their heritage with pride and to strive for a better future.

In conclusion, "Wakanda, the City of the Aspiring Self" presents "Black Panther" as a groundbreaking film that celebrates African-American history in a way that is empowering and uplifting. By emphasizing themes of Ancient Wisdom, community rituals, disciplined self-improvement, and a clear moral code, the film offers a refreshing alternative to narratives of victimization and nihilism. Through the example of Wakanda, "Black Panther" invites audiences to imagine a world where unity, dignity, and moral integrity reign supreme.

Analyze the Netflix movie Private Life in which Rachel and Richard try with desperation to conceive a child. Then write an essay titled, “A Baby Won’t Solve Your Problems” in which you present an argument that addresses the claim that based on the characters’ motives, flawed character, and delusions about parenthood, they would be making a better ethical decision to not have children rather than subject a child and themselves to the misery that would result from their unrealistic expectations as parents.

ChatGPT

Title: "A Baby Won’t Solve Your Problems": Ethical Considerations in Parenthood as Portrayed in "Private Life"

In the Netflix movie "Private Life," the characters Rachel and Richard navigate the emotionally fraught journey of trying to conceive a child. Their desperation and longing for parenthood drive them to extreme measures, but upon closer examination of their motives, flawed characters, and unrealistic expectations, it becomes evident that bringing a child into their lives would not only be unwise but also ethically questionable. In this essay, titled "A Baby Won’t Solve Your Problems," I argue that Rachel and Richard would be making a better ethical decision to not have children, rather than subjecting a child and themselves to the potential misery resulting from their unrealistic expectations as parents.

Throughout "Private Life," Rachel and Richard grapple with the pressures of societal expectations and their own desires for fulfillment. They view parenthood as the solution to their dissatisfaction and yearn for the sense of purpose and fulfillment they believe a child will bring. However, their motivations are deeply flawed, driven by a desire to fill a void rather than a genuine understanding of the responsibilities and sacrifices inherent in parenting.

Furthermore, both Rachel and Richard exhibit significant character flaws that raise serious concerns about their ability to provide a stable and nurturing environment for a child. Rachel's obsession with conceiving a child borders on desperation, leading her to pursue invasive fertility treatments despite the physical and emotional toll they exact. Richard, on the other hand, grapples with his own insecurities and shortcomings, which manifest in his reluctance to fully commit to the idea of parenthood and his tendency to prioritize his own desires above those of his partner.

Additionally, Rachel and Richard harbor unrealistic expectations about parenthood, viewing it through a romanticized lens that fails to acknowledge the challenges and complexities involved. They envision a child as the key to unlocking happiness and fulfillment in their lives, failing to recognize that parenthood is not a panacea for their underlying issues. By clinging to this idealized vision of parenthood, they risk subjecting themselves and a potential child to profound disappointment and disillusionment.

In light of these considerations, it becomes clear that Rachel and Richard would be making a more ethical decision to forego parenthood rather than subjecting a child to the potential consequences of their flawed motives, character flaws, and unrealistic expectations. By choosing not to have children, they would be sparing themselves and a potential child from the turmoil and misery that could result from their misguided pursuit of parenthood as a solution to their problems.

In conclusion, "Private Life" offers a poignant exploration of the complexities and challenges of parenthood, highlighting the ethical considerations that accompany the decision to bring a child into the world. Through the characters of Rachel and Richard, the film underscores the importance of critically examining one's motives, character, and expectations before embarking on the journey of parenthood. Ultimately, "A Baby Won’t Solve Your Problems" serves as a reminder that the decision to have children should be made with careful consideration and a clear understanding of the responsibilities and sacrifices involved.

Based on Ronnie Coleman: The King and Stop At Nothing: The Lance Armstrong Story, write an essay titled: “Self-Obsession and Ferocious Competition” in which you address the argument that it is wrong to condemn Lance Armstrong for his doping while giving Ronnie Coleman a free pass for his PED use because in sports, all athletes find any advantage they can get away with whether these advantages be legal or not. Be sure to have a counterargument-rebuttal section before your conclusion.

ChatGPT

Title: Self-Obsession and Ferocious Competition: A Critical Examination of Doping in Sports

Introduction:

In the world of elite athletics, the pursuit of victory often blurs the lines between fair competition and unethical behavior. Ronnie Coleman, celebrated as the "King" of bodybuilding, and Lance Armstrong, renowned for his dominance in cycling, both faced allegations of performance-enhancing drug (PED) use during their careers. While some argue that condemning Armstrong for doping while giving Coleman a pass is hypocritical, a closer examination reveals nuanced differences in their circumstances and the ethical implications of their actions. This essay delves into the debate surrounding doping in sports, addressing the argument that all athletes seek any advantage they can, legal or not, before presenting a counterargument and rebuttal.

Body:

The Prevalence of Doping in Sports:
- It is undeniable that doping has been a persistent issue in sports across various disciplines, with athletes constantly seeking ways to gain a competitive edge. From anabolic steroids to blood doping, the history of sports is rife with instances of athletes resorting to banned substances to enhance performance.
- Both Coleman and Armstrong competed in sports where the pressure to excel was immense, and the temptation to use PEDs as a means to gain an advantage was pervasive.
Ethical Considerations:
- While it is true that many athletes may feel compelled to bend or break the rules in pursuit of success, the ethical implications of doping cannot be overlooked. Doping undermines the integrity of sport, deceives fans and sponsors, and poses serious health risks to athletes.
- The distinction lies in how athletes respond to this pressure and temptation. While some succumb to the allure of PEDs, others choose to uphold the principles of fair play and compete within the confines of the rules.

Counterargument and Rebuttal:

Different Degrees of Moral Responsibility:
- It is argued that condemning Armstrong for doping while giving Coleman a pass is inconsistent, as both athletes engaged in behavior that compromised the integrity of their respective sports.
- However, this overlooks the fact that the severity of their actions and the consequences thereof differ significantly. Armstrong not only violated anti-doping regulations but also orchestrated one of the most elaborate doping schemes in sporting history, deceiving fans, sponsors, and fellow competitors.
- In contrast, while Coleman's PED use may raise ethical concerns, it did not involve the same level of deceit or manipulation. Moreover, the cultural acceptance of PEDs in bodybuilding, while not justifiable, may mitigate the moral culpability of individual athletes to some extent.

Conclusion:

In the realm of elite athletics, the ethical implications of doping remain a contentious issue. While it is true that many athletes feel pressure to seek any advantage they can get away with, whether legal or not, the line between fair competition and cheating must be firmly upheld. Condemning Lance Armstrong for his doping while giving Ronnie Coleman a free pass reflects the nuanced differences in their circumstances and the severity of their actions. Ultimately, the integrity of sport depends on the commitment of athletes, governing bodies, and fans to uphold the principles of fair play and ethical competition, regardless of the temptations that may arise.

A. Winter Dreams (Hasan Minhaj?) or B. The Graduate and Private Life or C. Goodfellas and City of God: Write an essay comparing Goodfellas and City of God that explores the contradictions of the gang providing structure and a family belonging on one hand and chaos and ruthless tribalism on the other. (see response below). The Oldboy and Munich (revenge, justice, derangement): Comparing the movie The Oldboy and Munich, write an essay that addresses the claim that revenge is a drug that leads to derangement, provides a theater of justice to appease others, destroys effective long-term planning, and entices us with short-term gratification.

Posted at 12:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

04/07/2024

Ray Kroc from the Founder as an Essay Option for Cal Newport Essay, English 1A & Comparing The Graduate and Private Life for 1C

ChatGPT

In the pursuit of success and fulfillment, the intersection of passion and craftsmanship is often heralded as a key to unlocking one's potential. Cal Newport, in his insightful exploration of this concept, asserts that passion alone is insufficient without the disciplined approach of a craftsman mindset. Furthermore, he emphasizes the importance of anchoring this pursuit within a moral framework, as the absence of ethical considerations can render even the most skilled craftsmanship futile. This nuanced perspective finds resonance in the cautionary tale depicted in the Netflix movie "The Founder," which chronicles the rise of Ray Kroc and serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of pursuing excellence without a moral compass.

"The Founder" presents the gripping narrative of Ray Kroc, a struggling salesman who stumbles upon a fledgling fast-food restaurant called McDonald's in 1950s California. Recognizing the potential for expansion and profit, Kroc seizes the opportunity to franchise the restaurant, eventually wresting control from its original owners, the McDonald brothers. Through cunning manipulation and ruthless business tactics, Kroc transforms McDonald's into a global empire, achieving unparalleled success and wealth in the process.

At first glance, Kroc appears to embody the virtues of the craftsman mindset. He demonstrates unwavering determination, tireless work ethic, and an unrelenting commitment to excellence. His relentless pursuit of perfection in the realm of fast food reflects the dedication and discipline characteristic of a true craftsman. However, beneath the veneer of success lies a troubling reality: Kroc's pursuit of greatness is devoid of ethical considerations, leading him down a morally dubious path fraught with deception, betrayal, and exploitation.

Kroc's lack of a moral compass becomes evident as he systematically sidelines the McDonald brothers, disregarding their original vision and exploiting legal loopholes to seize control of the company. His single-minded pursuit of profit blinds him to the human cost of his actions, as he callously disregards the livelihoods and well-being of those he perceives as obstacles to his ambitions. In his relentless quest for dominance, Kroc sacrifices integrity and decency, betraying both himself and those around him in the process.

Moreover, Kroc's disregard for ethical principles ultimately undermines the very foundation of his success. While his cunning and shrewd business acumen propel him to the pinnacle of corporate achievement, they also sow the seeds of his downfall. The moral bankruptcy of his actions tarnishes the reputation of McDonald's and erodes trust among customers and business partners alike. In the end, Kroc's legacy is marred by controversy and condemnation, serving as a cautionary tale about the perils of forsaking morality in the pursuit of greatness.

In light of Cal Newport's insights, the cautionary tale of Ray Kroc in "The Founder" serves as a stark reminder of the intrinsic connection between craftsmanship and morality. While excellence and proficiency are laudable goals, they must be tempered by ethical considerations to truly yield meaningful and sustainable success. Kroc's journey serves as a sobering reminder that true greatness is not measured solely by financial gain or corporate conquests, but by the integrity and compassion with which one conducts oneself in the pursuit of excellence.

In conclusion, "The Founder" offers a compelling narrative that underscores the importance of combining passion with a craftsman mindset, while simultaneously emphasizing the imperative of anchoring this pursuit within a moral framework. Ray Kroc's cautionary tale serves as a poignant reminder that excellence devoid of ethics is a hollow achievement, destined to crumble under the weight of its own moral bankruptcy. As Cal Newport aptly observes, the pursuit of greatness must be guided by a moral compass, lest it lead us down a path of moral compromise and self-destruction.

***

Posted at 12:54 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

04/01/2024

Spring 2024 Safetyism #1

Definition of Safetyism

From an abstract:

This paper by Lucy Foulkes and Jack L. Andrews has been published by New Ideas in Psychology. The abstract says:

“In the past decade, there have been extensive efforts in the Western world to raise public awareness about mental health problems, with the goal of reducing or preventing these symptoms across the population. Despite these efforts, reported rates of mental health problems have increased in these countries over the same period. In this paper, we present the hypothesis that, paradoxically, awareness efforts are contributing to this reported increase in mental health problems. We term this the prevalence inflation hypothesis. First, we argue that mental health awareness efforts are leading to more accurate reporting of previously under-recognised symptoms, a beneficial outcome. Second, and more problematically, we propose that awareness efforts are leading some individuals to interpret and report milder forms of distress as mental health problems. We propose that this then leads some individuals to experience a genuine increase in symptoms, because labelling distress as a mental health problem can affect an individual’s self-concept and behaviour in a way that is ultimately self-fulfilling. For example, interpreting low levels of anxiety as symptomatic of an anxiety disorder might lead to behavioural avoidance, which can further exacerbate anxiety symptoms. We propose that the increase in reported symptoms then drives further awareness efforts: the two processes influence each other in a cyclical, intensifying manner. We end by suggesting ways to test this hypothesis and argue that future awareness efforts need to mitigate the issues we present …”

***

In other words:

Freaking out and becoming paranoid about small, normal anxieties is an overreaction, which is more dangerous than the original false diagnosis. Furthermore, when we freak out and diagnose ourselves with a variety of afflictions, we pamper ourselves, avoid challenges, and become terrified of engaging with reality. As a result, we become weak, dependent on security blankets, and dysfunctional to engage with the real world. The results of our overreactions is that we ended up afflicting ourselves with the very dysfunctions we feared getting in the first place. We have become guilty of a self-fulfilling prophecy. As such, we are trapped in a negative doom loop.

***

Essay 3 on Safetyism for 200 Points Due May 12

Then write a 1,200-word argumentative essay that addresses the claim that there is an ideology in our culture that is infecting society and young people in particular with the pathologies of “safetyism”--a sense of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation--and thereby causing the very things the adult world does not want to happen to their children: infantilization, mental decline, emotional fragility, paranoia, maladaptation, and a flagrant absence of qualities needed to survive and thrive in both career and meaningful relationships.

Building Block #1 for Safetyism Essay for 25 points

Two Paragraphs

Paragraph 1: Read Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind.” Then read John Warner’s counterargument “Safetyism Was Never Real" and Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem." Based on these readings, develop a one-paragraph definition of Safetyism. What is it? What are its distinguishing characteristics?

Paragraph 2: Write a thesis in which you argue if Safetyism is “a real thing” and should be a cause of concern or not. Be sure to give 3 or 4 reasons to explain your position. Those reasons will map your body paragraphs.

Building Block #2 for Safetyism Essay for 25 points

One Paragraph

Write a counterargument-rebuttal paragraph to strengthen the persuasive power of your argumentative claim.

***

"Calling Dr. Tiktok: Experts Weigh in on Alarming Social-Media Trend" by Russ Bahorsky in the online version of A&S Magazine, November-December 2022 issue

Bahorsky writes that Tiktok is a magnet for anxiety seekers. He writes:

According to Statista, a company specializing in market data and consumer insight, much of TikTok’s rapid rise to social-media stardom occurred during the coronavirus pandemic with a surge in growth of 180% among 15–25-year-old users. That demographic has been hit hard by the isolation, anxiety and general unwellness that the lockdowns caused, so it may be no surprise that the last several years have also seen a sharp increase in the number of teens and young adults using the app to learn about mental-health disorders and to self-diagnose themselves with a variety of conditions like autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), borderline personality disorder, dissociative identity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and others.

***

Rather than seek professionals with science-based evidence to make their claims, more and more people are going to "The University of Google." In the words of the author:

It should go without saying that diagnosing oneself with any condition comes with risks. Despite the wealth of medical and pseudo-medical information readily available online, it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that Google is a substitute for a degree in medicine or clinical psychology and doing so could lead to unnecessary stress caused by overestimating the severity of a problem or to missing out on important treatment when a self-diagnosis is incorrect.

Not only do internet sources vary in accuracy and reliability, said Bethany Teachman, a professor of psychology and director of clinical training for the College’s Department of Psychology, but arriving at a correct diagnosis requires training and context.

“Distinguishing between certain diagnostic categories can be tricky,” Teachman said. “There are several symptoms, such as difficulty concentrating, that are part of multiple disorders so people may assign themselves an incorrect diagnosis. As another example, periods of sadness can occur as part of a unipolar depressive disorder, which includes depressive episodes only, but also as part of a bipolar disorder, which includes both depressive and manic episodes. A person self-diagnosing may focus on the depression symptoms but not recognize that they also have periods of mania.”

***

Why do people diagnose themselves?

Boredom
Navel-gazing is fun when you're bored.
It feels good to get "expert" advice for free.
People are looking for a silver bullet to explain all their complex problems.
Herd behavior: "Since everyone else is doing it, why can't I?"
Too much time alone
A lack of purpose in life causes idle people to fixate on unhealthy websites.

Study Guide for “How Anxiety Became Content” by Derek Thompson

One. What is the big business of trauma?

The idea of trauma is big business, a blockbuster algorithm that generates lucrative social influencers. The more you can get your audience anxious and scared, the more you can get them glued to your context. Making your audience dysfunctional is your business model. You get them sick, and then you claim you have the cure. You are the ultimate social-media charlatan.

As we read:

Anxiety has become its own genre of popular content. Social-media feeds are crowded with therapy influencers who tell us to be more aware of our anxiety, our trauma, our distress. Instagram is full of anxious confessions and therapy-speak The TikTok hashtag #Trauma has more than 6 billion views. According to Listen Notes, a podcast search engine, more than 5,500 podcasts have the word trauma in their title. Celebrity media are awash with mental-health testimonials, and summaries of those testimonials, including “39 Celebrities Who Have Opened Up About Mental HealthLinks,” “What 22 Celebrities Have Said About Having DepressionLinks,” and “12 Times Famous Men Got Real About Mental Health.”

***

Two. What is Derek Thompson’s central argument?

Look at paragraph 2 in which we read:

But in the past few years, I’ve become more convinced that the way we commonly discuss mental-health issues, especially on the internet, isn’t helping us. Watching and listening to so much anxiety content, which transforms a medical diagnosis into a kind of popular media category, might be contributing to our national anxiety crisis.

***

Three. What is the danger of prevalence inflation?

Prevalence inflation is the tendency to “process normal problems of living as signs of a decline in mental health.”

If we tag normal problems as traumatic, then we tend to over protect ourselves from “trauma,” which is no trauma at all, and this becomes a first step in a form of self-debilitation called safetyism in which we retreat into a cocoon and atrophy both physically and intellectually as we disengage from the real world, we become fearful of challenges that would make us stronger, and we excuse ourselves from being accountable for life’s normal challenges.

Another harmful feature of prevalence inflation is that an exaggerated self-diagnosis, with no basis in fact, will actually make people more anxious, thereby creating a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy.

Yet another harmful effect of prevalence inflation is the blossoming of social media charlatans, fakes, and grifters, “therapy influencers” with no credentials who are making us hyper-aware of our supposed anxieties and traumas, compelling us to seek sanctuary is safe spaces where we marinate in the fear and trembling of safetyism.

Finally, prevalence inflation obliterates a reasonable and sane sense of proportion and creates an ironing-out effect. If everything is traumatic, then nothing is. We must be able to differentiate the trauma of physical violence and bigotry with the "trauma" with someone who found a fingernail in their fast-food burger and then made an outraged TikTok video about their "trauma."

Four. Why is having a supposed anxiety crisis or an anxiety affliction a potent status symbol?

For many who claim to be afflicted with anxiety, they are hiding in the paralysis of safetyism and with nothing to show for a life of timid hibernation, they desperately seek status as someone who is “mentally afflicted” and thereby worthy of attention and perhaps even counsel. As we read:

Darby Saxbe, a clinical psychologist at the University of Southern California and a mother to a high schooler, told me she has come to think that, for many young people, claiming an anxiety crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder has become like a status symbol. “I worry that for some people, it’s become an identity marker that makes people feel special and unique,” Saxbe said. “That’s a big problem because this modern idea that anxiety is an identity gives people a fixed mindset, telling them this is who they are and will be in the future.” On the contrary, she said, therapy works best when patients come into sessions believing that they can get better. That means believing that anxiety is treatable, modifiable, and malleable—all the things a fixed identity is not.

***

Five. What is catastrophic thinking and why is it so harmful?

The narcissistic desire to be special by claiming a nonexistent affliction leads to exaggerated emotional responses to events that don’t merit level-10 outrage. In the attention economy, you don't get eyeballs if you're mildly afflicted with something. You need to be full tilt or in the extreme. As we read:

This is just one way in which our society popularizes the language of therapy while eviscerating the substance of it. Another is through the arousing negativity contained in much viral media: indignation, anger, shame, “I’m literally shaking.” Something about the five-alarm fire of moral outrage burns efficiently across the prairie of the social web. But cognitive behavioral therapy, for example, encourages patients to avoid catastrophic thinking, to cool the fire of anger, to reconstruct their feelings and thoughts to be more patient with themselves and with others. The share of adults receiving mental-health treatment is surging but we have built an online ecosystem that thrives on the very principles that counselors implore us to reject.

***

Six. How does having a smartphone encourage catastrophic thinking?

When we own smartphones, we tend to live in the tiny world of the smartphone ecosystem. This miniscule environment hijacks our brains and consumes our thoughts. We can’t see beyond this tiny world so that we are more gullible to false and harmful messages. As we read:

When I asked Saxbe whether internet conversations about anxiety might be partly driving the anxiety crisis, she readily agreed. Marshall McLuhan’s observation that “the medium is the message” has been on her mind as she notes the way that social media takes people out of the physical world. “We all, and young people in particular, too often use our phones to withdraw and avoid,” she said. “So even if we’re getting insightful therapeutic content, we’re often getting it while we’re in bed and on our phones.” Of course, she acknowledged, some online conversations can feel cathartic and even help people put into words their inchoate feelings. But alone on couches and in beds, thin lines separate active reflection (which can be healthy), rumination (less healthy), and outright wallowing (not healthy). “It’s not so different from listening to sad songs when you’re sad,” she said. “Of course, I would tell a patient that it can be cathartic. But if it’s all you do to cope? That’s bad.”

More deeply, she added, the algorithmic architecture of social media isn’t doing us any favors. The “If you liked that, you might like this” organization of information on social media means that our engagement with certain kinds of content—politics, lifestyle, or mental health—can burrow us deeper into that genre. Rather than allow us to work through our negative feelings and move on, it can trap us in algorithmic whirlpools of outrage, doubt, and anger. (Anybody who has doomscrolled through a particularly gruesome news cycle can surely empathize.)

***

Seven. What is the solution to debilitating ourselves with exaggerated self-diagnoses of anxiety and depression?

Rather than getting paralyzed in the maze of fear and depression and reinforcing that maze by reading more and more about our “afflictions,” we should move forward, take action, and do activities that will take us out of our “brain hijack.” Living inside our heads the last thing we should be doing. As we read:

The solution begins with the principle of opposite action. Saxbe said the best thing we can do for ourselves when we’re anxious or depressed is to fight our instinct to avoid and ruminate, rather than get sucked into algorithmic wormholes of avoidance and rumination. The best thing one can do when they’re depressed is to reject the instinct to stay in bed basking in the glow of a phone, and to instead step outside, engage with a friend, or do something else that provides more opportunities for validation and reward. “I would tell people to do what’s uncomfortable, to run toward danger,” Saxbe said. “You are not your anxiety. You’re so much more.”

***

ChatGPT Prompt:

In the context of Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” write an analysis of the big business of trauma, prevalence inflation, and Thompson's prescription for allaying the pathologies resulting in the self-diagnosing of various supposed traumas.

ChatGPT

In Derek Thompson's compelling exploration, "How Anxiety Became Content," he delves into the intricate interplay between modern media consumption, the commodification of personal experiences, and the rise of what he terms as "prevalence inflation" in the realm of mental health. Thompson's analysis underscores the profound transformation of anxiety from a private affliction to a lucrative form of content within the digital landscape, reflecting broader societal shifts in how we perceive and engage with our emotional well-being.

Central to Thompson's argument is the notion of trauma as big business, wherein the proliferation of online platforms and social media channels has created a marketplace for the monetization of personal narratives. He astutely observes how the amplification of individual experiences, often through sensationalized storytelling and performative vulnerability, has fueled a culture of commodified anxiety. In this context, the line between genuine introspection and self-promotion becomes increasingly blurred, as individuals navigate the pressures of online validation and the pursuit of virality.

Moreover, Thompson elucidates the concept of "prevalence inflation," whereby the perceived prevalence of anxiety and related mental health issues appears to soar in tandem with their visibility in media and popular discourse. This phenomenon reflects not only the amplification effect of digital platforms but also the social contagion dynamics inherent in online communities. As individuals encounter and engage with narratives of anxiety and trauma, there is a tendency for these experiences to be normalized and even valorized, leading to a snowball effect wherein the perceived prevalence of such issues appears to skyrocket.

However, Thompson does not merely diagnose the problem; he also offers a thoughtful prescription for addressing the pathologies underlying the self-diagnosing trend. He advocates for a recalibration of our relationship with media consumption, emphasizing the importance of discernment and critical engagement. By encouraging individuals to approach online content with a healthy skepticism and a nuanced understanding of narrative construction, Thompson suggests that we can mitigate the harmful effects of prevalence inflation and foster a more authentic discourse around mental health.

In conclusion, Derek Thompson's analysis sheds light on the complex dynamics driving the commodification of trauma and the phenomenon of prevalence inflation in the digital age. Through his incisive examination, he prompts us to reconsider our relationship with media consumption and advocate for a more discerning approach to online content. By doing so, we can begin to dismantle the commercialization of anxiety and foster a more nuanced understanding of mental health in the digital era.

ChatGPT Prompt:

In the context of Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” write an essay that addresses the claim that the big business of trauma, prevalence inflation, performative vulnerability, and commodified anxiety are together creating a new kind of social media personality that can be characterized as a narcissistic grifter.

ChatGPT Response:

In Derek Thompson's thought-provoking piece, "How Anxiety Became Content," he delves deep into the evolving landscape of social media and its profound impact on mental health discourse. Central to his analysis is the notion of the commodification of anxiety and trauma, the phenomenon of prevalence inflation, and the emergence of what can be described as a new breed of social media personality: the narcissistic grifter.

The term "narcissistic grifter" encapsulates a persona that thrives on the exploitation of personal narratives for self-aggrandizement and financial gain. This individual is characterized by a relentless pursuit of attention and validation, often at the expense of genuine introspection and empathy. Thompson's exploration illuminates how the convergence of performative vulnerability and commodified anxiety has provided fertile ground for the cultivation of such personas within the digital sphere.

At the heart of this phenomenon lies the commodification of trauma, wherein personal narratives of hardship and suffering are repackaged as consumable content for mass consumption. In the pursuit of virality and online validation, individuals may exaggerate or fabricate experiences of anxiety and trauma, transforming genuine struggles into sensationalized spectacles designed to capture the attention of audiences. This commodification not only trivializes the lived experiences of those genuinely grappling with mental health issues but also perpetuates a culture of voyeurism and exploitation.

Moreover, prevalence inflation exacerbates this dynamic by perpetuating the illusion of an epidemic of anxiety and trauma, thereby amplifying the market demand for content centered around these themes. As individuals compete for visibility and engagement within an increasingly crowded digital landscape, there is a temptation to conform to prevailing narratives of suffering and victimhood, further fueling the cycle of performative vulnerability and commodified anxiety.

In this environment, the narcissistic grifter emerges as a central figure, adept at leveraging personal narratives of trauma and anxiety for personal gain. This individual is driven by a relentless pursuit of attention and validation, using performative displays of vulnerability to cultivate a loyal following and monetize their experiences. However, behind the facade of authenticity lies a calculated manipulation of emotions and narratives, with little regard for the genuine well-being of their audience.

The rise of the narcissistic grifter represents a troubling convergence of social media culture and the commercialization of personal experiences. By exploiting the vulnerabilities of their audience for personal gain, these individuals perpetuate a cycle of performative vulnerability and commodified anxiety, further eroding the authenticity and empathy that should underpin discussions of mental health.

In conclusion, Derek Thompson's analysis sheds light on the emergence of a new kind of social media personality: the narcissistic grifter. Through the commodification of trauma, prevalence inflation, and performative vulnerability, these individuals exploit personal narratives of anxiety and trauma for self-aggrandizement and financial gain. As we navigate the complexities of social media culture, it is essential to remain vigilant against the manipulation and exploitation perpetuated by such personas, striving instead for genuine empathy and understanding in our discussions of mental health.

ChatGPT Prompt:

In the juxtaposition of Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's piece "How Anxiety Became Content," a stark portrayal emerges of the toxic intersection between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. This convergence not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also cultivates a breeding ground for what can be described as a generation of narcissistic con artists.

Haidt's essay serves as a poignant critique of the pervasive influence of smartphones and social media on the development of today's youth. He argues that excessive screen time and online engagement contribute to a host of detrimental effects, ranging from diminished attention spans to heightened rates of anxiety and depression. Central to his analysis is the notion that the allure of constant connectivity fosters a culture of distraction and disconnection, wherein genuine human interaction is sacrificed at the altar of virtual validation.

In contrast, Thompson's exploration delves into the commodification of anxiety within the digital landscape, highlighting how personal narratives of trauma and suffering have become currency in the attention economy. He elucidates the phenomenon of performative vulnerability, wherein individuals exploit their own struggles for online validation and financial gain. Thompson's analysis underscores the profound transformation of anxiety from a private affliction to a lucrative form of content, perpetuated by the relentless pursuit of likes, shares, and engagement.

Together, these essays paint a damning portrait of the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. The constant pressure to curate a flawless online persona fosters a climate of hyper-competition and comparison, wherein individuals are compelled to project an image of success and happiness at all costs. In this environment, genuine vulnerability becomes a commodity to be traded and exploited for personal gain, blurring the lines between authenticity and artifice.

Moreover, the pervasive influence of social media amplifies the reach and impact of these performative narratives, creating a feedback loop wherein individuals are incentivized to perpetuate and exaggerate their struggles for maximum visibility and engagement. This cycle not only trivializes genuine experiences of anxiety and trauma but also perpetuates a culture of narcissism and self-absorption, wherein personal validation takes precedence over genuine human connection.

In this context, the term "narcissistic con artist" aptly captures the essence of individuals who exploit the vulnerabilities of others for personal gain within the digital sphere. By perpetuating a facade of authenticity while engaging in calculated manipulation and exploitation, these individuals sow seeds of mistrust and disillusionment, eroding the fabric of genuine human connection in the process.

In conclusion, the comparison of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" sheds light on the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. Together, these essays reveal the disturbing trend of a generation of narcissistic con artists who exploit personal narratives of trauma and suffering for personal gain, perpetuating a culture of superficiality and disconnection within the digital landscape. As we navigate the complexities of online engagement, it is imperative to remain vigilant against the manipulation and exploitation perpetuated by these individuals, striving instead for genuine empathy and connection in our interactions both online and offline.

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. Be sure to provide three examples of social media personalities to illustrate your points.

ChatGPT

In the juxtaposition of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content," a troubling portrait emerges of the toxic relationship between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. This fusion not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also cultivates a breeding ground for what can aptly be described as a generation of narcissistic con artists. Through the lens of three illustrative examples of social media personalities, we can discern the intricate ways in which this toxic marriage manifests.

Firstly, consider the case of "Influencer A," a popular lifestyle blogger who portrays an image of effortless perfection to her followers. Through meticulously curated posts showcasing her glamorous lifestyle, impeccable appearance, and seemingly flawless relationships, she perpetuates an idealized facade of happiness and success. However, behind the scenes, Influencer A struggles with anxiety and self-doubt, leading her to exploit her vulnerabilities for online validation. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and insecurity, she manipulates her audience's emotions, garnering sympathy and engagement while simultaneously perpetuating a culture of performative vulnerability.

Secondly, let's examine "Fitness Guru B," an Instagram personality known for his chiseled physique and motivational messages. On the surface, Fitness Guru B appears to embody the epitome of health and wellness, inspiring his followers to pursue their fitness goals with relentless determination. However, beneath the surface lies a darker truth: Fitness Guru B's extreme dedication to maintaining his image has led to an unhealthy obsession with perfection and validation. Despite struggling with body image issues and disordered eating, he continues to project an image of strength and discipline, exploiting his vulnerabilities to cultivate a loyal following and monetize his brand.

Lastly, consider "Travel Influencer C," whose Instagram feed is filled with envy-inducing images of exotic destinations and luxury accommodations. With each picture-perfect post, Travel Influencer C perpetuates the illusion of an idyllic nomadic lifestyle, enticing her followers to escape their mundane realities and live vicariously through her adventures. However, behind the glamorous facade lies a trail of deceit and manipulation. In reality, Travel Influencer C often relies on sponsored content and staged photoshoots to maintain her image, sacrificing authenticity for the sake of online validation and financial gain.

These examples illustrate the insidious ways in which social media personalities exploit the culture of performative vulnerability to cultivate a persona that is as lucrative as it is deceptive. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and insecurity, these individuals manipulate their audiences' emotions, perpetuating a cycle of voyeurism and exploitation. In doing so, they contribute to the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, creating a generation of narcissistic con artists who prioritize personal gain over genuine human connection.

In conclusion, the comparison of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" offers valuable insights into the corrosive impact of social media on mental health and well-being. Through the lens of three illustrative examples of social media personalities, we can discern the intricate ways in which this toxic marriage manifests, highlighting the need for greater awareness and vigilance in navigating the complexities of online engagement.

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. Be sure to provide three real-life examples of social media personalities to illustrate your points.

ChatGPT

In the intersection of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content," a troubling narrative emerges, exposing the detrimental effects of social media's toxic marriage with the culture of performative vulnerability. This convergence not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also cultivates a generation of individuals who exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain, effectively becoming narcissistic con artists. Through the examination of three real-life examples of social media personalities, we can illuminate the insidious nature of this phenomenon.

Firstly, let's consider the case of Essena O'Neill, a former Instagram influencer who gained fame and fortune by portraying an idyllic lifestyle of travel, fashion, and beauty. O'Neill meticulously curated her online persona, posting aspirational images that garnered her a large following and lucrative brand deals. However, in a shocking turn of events, O'Neill publicly denounced the culture of social media perfectionism, revealing that her seemingly perfect life was a facade crafted to please her audience and attract sponsorships. She confessed to experiencing profound feelings of loneliness and dissatisfaction behind the scenes, exposing the inherent dishonesty and manipulation prevalent in the influencer industry.

Secondly, we can examine the case of Caroline Calloway, a prominent figure in the world of Instagram influencers known for her whimsical storytelling and aspirational lifestyle. Calloway captivated her audience with tales of her adventures as a globe-trotting artist and writer, gaining a devoted following eager to emulate her carefree existence. However, her carefully constructed narrative began to unravel when it was revealed that many of her stories were embellished or outright fabricated. Calloway's penchant for performative vulnerability and self-mythologizing ultimately tarnished her reputation, highlighting the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity.

Lastly, let's explore the case of Belle Gibson, a wellness influencer who rose to fame for her inspirational story of overcoming terminal brain cancer through holistic treatments and healthy living. Gibson's narrative captivated millions of followers, who looked to her for guidance and inspiration in their own health journeys. However, it was later revealed that Gibson had fabricated her cancer diagnosis entirely, exploiting her fictitious illness to promote her wellness app and cookbook. Gibson's deception not only betrayed the trust of her followers but also underscored the dark underbelly of the wellness industry, where authenticity and truth are often sacrificed in pursuit of profit and fame.

These real-life examples illustrate the pervasive influence of social media in perpetuating a culture of performative vulnerability and deception. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and authenticity, these individuals manipulate their audiences' emotions, perpetuating a cycle of voyeurism and exploitation. In doing so, they contribute to the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, creating a generation of narcissistic con artists who prioritize personal gain over genuine human connection.

In conclusion, the comparison of Haidt's and Thompson's essays sheds light on the damaging impact of social media's toxic marriage with the culture of performative vulnerability. Through the examination of real-life examples of social media personalities, we can discern the insidious ways in which individuals exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain, perpetuating a cycle of manipulation and deceit. As we navigate the complexities of online engagement, it is essential to remain vigilant against the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity, striving instead for genuine human connection in our interactions both online and offline.

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. Be sure to provide three real-life examples of social media personalities to illustrate your points. For your last paragraph, do not use the transition "In conclusion"; rather, use a more sophisticated transition suitable for college-level writing.

ChatGPT

In the juxtaposition of Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's piece "How Anxiety Became Content," a troubling narrative unfolds, exposing the toxic alliance between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. This convergence not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also fosters a generation of individuals who exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain, effectively becoming narcissistic con artists. Through the examination of three real-life examples of social media personalities, we can shed light on the insidious nature of this phenomenon.

One striking example is Essena O'Neill, a former Instagram influencer who rose to prominence by showcasing an enviable lifestyle of travel, fashion, and beauty. O'Neill meticulously curated her online persona, amassing a large following and lucrative brand deals. However, she later shocked her audience by publicly denouncing the culture of social media perfectionism, revealing that her seemingly perfect life was a facade crafted to please her audience and attract sponsorships. This revelation exposed the inherent dishonesty and manipulation prevalent in the influencer industry.

Another illustrative case is Caroline Calloway, a prominent figure in the world of Instagram influencers known for her whimsical storytelling and aspirational lifestyle. Calloway captivated her audience with tales of her adventures as a globe-trotting artist and writer, gaining a devoted following eager to emulate her carefree existence. However, her carefully constructed narrative began to unravel when it was revealed that many of her stories were embellished or outright fabricated. Calloway's penchant for performative vulnerability and self-mythologizing ultimately tarnished her reputation, highlighting the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity.

A further example is Belle Gibson, a wellness influencer who gained fame for her inspirational story of overcoming terminal brain cancer through holistic treatments and healthy living. Gibson's narrative resonated with millions of followers seeking guidance and inspiration in their own health journeys. However, it was later uncovered that Gibson had fabricated her cancer diagnosis entirely, exploiting her fictitious illness to promote her wellness app and cookbook. Gibson's deception not only betrayed the trust of her followers but also underscored the dark underbelly of the wellness industry, where authenticity and truth are often sacrificed in pursuit of profit and fame.

These real-life examples vividly illustrate the pervasive influence of social media in perpetuating a culture of performative vulnerability and deception. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and authenticity, these individuals manipulate their audiences' emotions, perpetuating a cycle of voyeurism and exploitation. In doing so, they contribute to the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, creating a generation of narcissistic con artists who prioritize personal gain over genuine human connection.

Ultimately, the comparison of Haidt's and Thompson's essays serves as a poignant reminder of the complex and multifaceted nature of the digital age. As we navigate the intricacies of online engagement, it is imperative to remain vigilant against the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity. Only through critical reflection and discernment can we hope to mitigate the damaging effects of social media's toxic influence on our society and foster a culture of genuine human connection and empathy.

Read Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real." Then write an argumentative essay that addresses the claim that there is an ideology in our culture that is infecting society and young people in particular with the pathologies of “safetyism”--a sense of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation--and thereby causing the very things the adult world does not want to happen to their children: infantilization, mental decline, emotional fragility, paranoia, maladaptation, and a flagrant absence of qualities needed to survive and thrive in both career and meaningful relationships. Moreover, address the idea that this performative vulnerability is transforming young people into narcissistic grifters.

ChatGPT

In contemporary discourse, there is a growing concern surrounding an ideology permeating our culture, often referred to as "safetyism." This ideology, characterized by an emphasis on protecting individuals from perceived harm and discomfort, has been identified as a contributing factor to a host of negative outcomes, particularly among young people. Through an analysis of various perspectives presented in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real,” it becomes evident that safetyism fosters a sense of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation, leading to infantilization, emotional fragility, and a lack of resilience. Furthermore, this culture of performative vulnerability perpetuated by safetyism can transform young people into narcissistic grifters, prioritizing self-promotion and exploitation over genuine connection and growth.

Thompson’s exploration of how anxiety has become a commodity in the digital age sheds light on the phenomenon of prevalence inflation, wherein the perceived prevalence of anxiety and related mental health issues rises alongside their visibility in media and popular discourse. This prevalence inflation is exacerbated by the culture of safetyism, which tends to magnify and overstate the risks and traumas encountered by individuals, particularly young people. As a result, young people are increasingly shielded from discomfort and adversity, leading to a lack of resilience and adaptability necessary for navigating the complexities of the adult world.

Lukianoff and Haidt further delve into the detrimental effects of safetyism in their essay, "The Coddling of the American Mind." They argue that by prioritizing emotional safety over intellectual challenge, universities and institutions inadvertently promote a culture of fragility and avoidance. This culture of safetyism not only infantilizes young people but also stifles intellectual curiosity and critical thinking skills, hindering their ability to engage meaningfully with differing perspectives and navigate the complexities of the real world.

Paresky and Campbell challenge the notion that safetyism is solely responsible for the challenges faced by young people in their essay, "Safetyism Isn't the Problem." They argue that while safetyism may play a role in perpetuating emotional fragility, it is not the root cause. Instead, they point to broader cultural shifts, such as changes in parenting styles and the rise of social media, as contributing factors to the challenges faced by young people today. While safetyism may exacerbate these issues, addressing the underlying cultural dynamics is crucial for fostering resilience and adaptability in young people.

Warner's perspective in "Safetyism Was Never Real" offers a nuanced critique of the concept of safetyism, arguing that it is often exaggerated and mischaracterized in public discourse. He suggests that concerns about safetyism may stem from a broader societal anxiety about change and uncertainty rather than a genuine threat to individual autonomy and resilience. While safetyism may manifest in certain contexts, Warner contends that it is not the pervasive force that some make it out to be.

In conclusion, the ideologies of safetyism and performative vulnerability contribute to a culture of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation, which in turn lead to infantilization, emotional fragility, and a lack of resilience among young people. Moreover, this culture of performative vulnerability can transform young people into narcissistic grifters, prioritizing self-promotion and exploitation over genuine connection and growth. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach that considers broader cultural dynamics and promotes resilience, adaptability, and genuine human connection.

Summarize the arguments in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind." Then explain how these arguments are at odds with Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real." Specifically identify the counterarguments Pamela Paresky, Bradley Campbell, and John Warner present in the face of the arguments made by Derek Thompson, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt. Explain how persuasive these counterarguments are and what improvements would have to be made to make these counterarguments more persuasive.

ChatGPT

Summary of Arguments:

Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content": Thompson argues that the rise of anxiety-driven content on social media platforms has led to the commodification of mental health struggles. He suggests that this trend perpetuates a culture of anxiety and discontentment, exploiting individuals' insecurities for profit.
Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind": Lukianoff and Haidt contend that the overprotection of young people from potentially distressing or challenging ideas on college campuses has resulted in a generation ill-prepared to face adversity. They argue that the prioritization of emotional safety over intellectual rigor stifles free speech and critical thinking, ultimately harming both individuals and society.

Counterarguments:

Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem": Paresky and Campbell challenge the notion put forth by Thompson, Lukianoff, and Haidt that a culture of "safetyism" is rampant and harmful. They argue that concerns about safety on college campuses have been exaggerated and that efforts to create inclusive environments do not necessarily equate to coddling or stifling free speech. They propose that the focus should be on promoting resilience and robust discourse rather than perpetuating a narrative of crisis.
John Warner's “Safetyism Was Never Real": Warner further questions the premise of a pervasive culture of safetyism. He argues that the term has been misapplied and exaggerated to advance certain agendas, suggesting that the fears about the suppression of speech are unfounded. Warner asserts that the real issue lies in addressing legitimate concerns about harassment and discrimination while maintaining a commitment to free expression and open dialogue.

Persuasiveness and Potential Improvements:

Paresky and Campbell's Counterargument: Their perspective offers a valuable alternative viewpoint, highlighting the importance of creating inclusive environments without resorting to alarmist rhetoric. However, to enhance persuasiveness, they could provide more concrete evidence to support their claims and address specific examples of where the line between inclusivity and censorship might blur.
Warner's Counterargument: Warner's critique challenges the very premise of the opposing arguments, suggesting that the issue has been blown out of proportion. While his skepticism is valid, providing more nuanced examples and acknowledging instances where concerns about safetyism may be justified would strengthen his argument. Additionally, offering solutions for effectively balancing safety and free expression would enhance the persuasiveness of his perspective.

Comparing Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," write an essay that addresses the argument that both essays rely too much on exaggeration and alarmist extremes and ignore the real causes of societal breakdown to the degree that both essays are failures of persuasion.

Title: Deconstructing Exaggeration and Alarmism in Contemporary Discourse: A Critique of Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt

In contemporary discourse, the prevalence of alarmist rhetoric and exaggerated claims has become increasingly noticeable, particularly in discussions surrounding societal issues. Two prominent examples of this phenomenon are Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind." Both essays, while addressing significant societal concerns, tend to rely heavily on exaggeration and alarmist extremes, ultimately undermining their effectiveness in persuading readers. This essay will critically analyze these works, arguing that their overemphasis on alarmism detracts from a nuanced understanding of societal issues and inhibits genuine persuasion.

Firstly, both Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt employ sensationalized language and extreme scenarios to capture readers' attention. Thompson's depiction of anxiety as the central commodity of the digital age and Lukianoff/Haidt's portrayal of a generation crippled by fragility and hypersensitivity serve to shock rather than inform. By painting such exaggerated pictures, these authors risk alienating readers who may perceive their arguments as hyperbolic and disconnected from reality. Instead of fostering genuine engagement, this approach can lead to skepticism and resistance.

Moreover, both essays tend to oversimplify complex societal issues by attributing them to singular causes. Thompson primarily blames the rise of digital media for the commodification of anxiety, ignoring other contributing factors such as socioeconomic disparities and systemic pressures. Similarly, Lukianoff/Haidt attribute the phenomenon of "safetyism" to a misguided culture of overprotection, overlooking broader socio-cultural dynamics and historical contexts. By focusing narrowly on these supposed causes, the authors fail to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of societal breakdown, thereby weakening their arguments.

Furthermore, the failure to address counterarguments and alternative perspectives undermines the credibility of both essays. Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt present their arguments as absolute truths, leaving little room for dissent or dialogue. By dismissing opposing viewpoints, they overlook valuable insights and risk alienating readers who may hold differing beliefs. Persuasion, by its nature, requires a willingness to engage with diverse perspectives and acknowledge the complexity of the issues at hand. By neglecting this principle, both essays fall short in their attempts to persuade.

In conclusion, while Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Lukianoff/Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" address important societal concerns, their reliance on exaggeration and alarmist rhetoric ultimately undermines their effectiveness as persuasive works. By sensationalizing issues, oversimplifying causes, and dismissing opposing viewpoints, these essays fail to engage readers in meaningful dialogue and hinder progress towards genuine understanding and solutions. To truly persuade audiences, writers must strive for nuance, empathy, and a willingness to engage with complexity rather than resorting to alarmism and simplification.

Comparing Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," write an essay that addresses the argument that both essays are persuasive and compelling accounts of a young generation in a state of crisis in which they are encouraged to be overly fragile, prone to performative vulnerabilities, and growing into insufferable narcissists who are dysfunctional, unemployable, and incapable of leading America into the next century.

Title: Persuasive Portraits of a Generation: Analyzing Thompson's and Lukianoff/Haidt's Narratives of Contemporary Youth Crisis

In the contemporary landscape of societal analysis, two prominent voices have emerged, shedding light on what they perceive as a crisis afflicting the younger generation. Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" offer compelling narratives of a generation caught in a web of fragility, performative vulnerabilities, and narcissism. This essay delves into the persuasive qualities of both essays, examining their arguments regarding the state of today's youth and their implications for the future of America.

Thompson's exploration of how anxiety has become a commodity in the digital age resonates deeply with readers, tapping into the zeitgeist of a generation grappling with incessant pressure and scrutiny. Through vivid examples and incisive analysis, he paints a picture of a youth culture shaped by the relentless pursuit of validation and the commodification of personal experiences. By linking the rise of anxiety to the proliferation of digital media and the attention economy, Thompson compellingly illustrates how young people are encouraged to perform their vulnerabilities for public consumption, perpetuating a cycle of self-doubt and insecurity.

Similarly, Lukianoff and Haidt's examination of the phenomenon of "safetyism" provides a thought-provoking analysis of the cultural trends that have contributed to the perceived fragility of today's youth. Drawing on psychological research and anecdotal evidence, they argue persuasively that an overemphasis on physical and emotional safety has led to a generation ill-equipped to navigate the challenges of the real world. By highlighting the detrimental effects of excessive coddling and the suppression of uncomfortable ideas, they make a compelling case for the importance of resilience and intellectual freedom in fostering personal growth and societal progress.

Both essays effectively capture the anxieties and frustrations of a generation coming of age in an increasingly complex and uncertain world. By framing their arguments within the broader context of societal trends and cultural norms, Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt provide compelling insights into the challenges facing today's youth. Moreover, their narratives resonate with readers by tapping into universal fears and aspirations, making the issues they discuss feel urgent and relevant.

However, it is essential to critically examine the implications of these narratives and the extent to which they accurately reflect the experiences of all young people. While Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt offer persuasive accounts of a generation grappling with fragility and narcissism, their portrayals risk oversimplifying complex social phenomena and perpetuating negative stereotypes. It is crucial to recognize the diversity and resilience of today's youth, acknowledging that not all individuals fit neatly into the narratives presented by these authors.

In conclusion, Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" offer persuasive and compelling accounts of a young generation navigating a complex and challenging world. By shining a spotlight on the pressures and vulnerabilities faced by today's youth, these essays provoke important conversations about the future of America and the values we hold dear. However, it is essential to approach these narratives with a critical eye, recognizing the limitations of singular perspectives and the need for a more nuanced understanding of generational dynamics.

Sneak Peak Into Essay 3

Write an essay that addresses the following: While I concede many of the points in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," especially in terms of the way young people can get lost in their social media bubbles and become influenced by hysterical views and performative anxiety resulting in paranoia and dysfunction, I find that their essays have egregious flaws. For one, the essays are hypocritical in that their alarmist view of the young generation is itself a form of performative anxiety designed to get clicks and to provide a platform to unfairly demonize young people when in fact people of all ages are struggling with mental problems associated with social media addiction. Two, their essays are deflections of the real causes of anxiety in the young generation: inflated costs of education and housing, an uncertain job market, global warming, and economic disparities favoring the boomer generation. Third, the essays rely too much on anecdotes to generalize about the young generation. A small percentage of young people may be losing their minds to performative anxiety, but to paint the young generation as being uninformed, overly fragile, and narcissistic is a gross overgeneralization.

ChatGPT

In the realm of contemporary discourse surrounding the mental landscape of the younger generation, Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" stand as prominent voices, echoing concerns about the impact of social media on mental health. While these essays offer valuable insights into the perils of social media bubbles and the proliferation of performative anxiety, they are not without their notable flaws.

Primarily, both Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt fall prey to a certain level of hypocrisy by perpetuating an alarmist narrative regarding the younger generation. Their critiques, while valid to an extent, often adopt a sensationalized tone aimed at generating clicks and reinforcing stereotypes about young people. In their quest to highlight the pitfalls of performative anxiety, they inadvertently contribute to the very phenomenon they critique, perpetuating a cycle of fear and apprehension.

Furthermore, these essays tend to overlook the broader societal factors contributing to the rise of anxiety among young people. While social media undoubtedly plays a role, it is but one piece of a much larger puzzle. Economic insecurity, exacerbated by inflated education and housing costs, an uncertain job market, and the looming specter of global warming, all contribute significantly to the collective anxiety experienced by younger generations. By fixating solely on social media, Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt neglect to address these systemic issues, thereby providing an incomplete analysis of the problem at hand.

Moreover, the reliance on anecdotal evidence to generalize about an entire generation is a glaring weakness of both essays. While it is undeniable that some individuals may succumb to performative anxiety, it is unfair and intellectually lazy to extrapolate these experiences to characterize an entire demographic. Such generalizations not only overlook the diversity of experiences within the younger generation but also perpetuate harmful stereotypes that undermine meaningful dialogue and understanding.

In conclusion, while Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Lukianoff and Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" offer valuable insights into the challenges faced by young people in the digital age, they are marred by significant flaws. Their alarmist tone, failure to address systemic issues, and reliance on anecdotal evidence detract from the credibility of their arguments. Moving forward, a more nuanced approach that acknowledges the complexities of the issue and considers a broader range of contributing factors is essential to fostering a meaningful discourse surrounding mental health in the younger generation.

***

Analyze the major points in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind;” then in an argumentative essay, assess how persuasive their arguments are in the context of the following counterarguments: The essays are too alarmist and rely on anecdotes rather than comprehensive studies; their arguments may confuse correlation with causation; their arguments are as guilty of performative anxiety as the supposed performative anxiety they identify; their arguments focus only on wealthy privileged colleges and therefore don’t address a large swatch of young college students.

ChatGPT

Title: A Critical Assessment of Anxiety Narratives: Unpacking Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind”

Introduction: In recent years, the discourse surrounding anxiety among young adults has gained significant traction. Two prominent voices in this conversation are Derek Thompson, with his piece "How Anxiety Became Content," and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, authors of "The Coddling of the American Mind." While these narratives shed light on the growing prevalence of anxiety among college students, it is imperative to critically analyze their major points and evaluate their persuasiveness in light of several counterarguments.

Thesis Statement: This essay aims to critically assess the persuasiveness of Thompson's and Lukianoff and Haidt's arguments, considering counterarguments that highlight concerns regarding alarmism, anecdotal evidence, correlation versus causation, performative anxiety, and the focus on privileged colleges.

Body:

Major Points in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content”: a. Thompson highlights the commodification of anxiety, framing it as content for media consumption. b. He discusses how social media exacerbates feelings of anxiety and insecurity among young adults. c. Thompson argues that the normalization of anxiety has led to its acceptance as a cultural norm.
Major Points in Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind”: a. Lukianoff and Haidt explore the phenomenon of "safetyism" on college campuses, where the prioritization of emotional safety stifles free speech. b. They discuss the impact of overprotection and the avoidance of discomfort on young adults' mental resilience. c. The authors propose strategies to counteract the culture of overprotection and promote intellectual diversity on college campuses.
Assessment of Persuasiveness: a. Concerns Regarding Alarmism: Both Thompson and Lukianoff and Haidt employ alarmist language to draw attention to the issue of anxiety. While this may effectively capture readers' attention, it risks sensationalizing the issue and detracting from a nuanced understanding of the underlying factors contributing to anxiety.

b. Reliance on Anecdotes: One critique of both narratives is their reliance on anecdotal evidence rather than comprehensive studies. While anecdotes can provide valuable insights, they may not accurately represent broader trends. Incorporating empirical research would strengthen their arguments.

c. Confusion of Correlation with Causation: Both narratives run the risk of conflating correlation with causation. While they identify associations between certain phenomena and increased anxiety levels, they may oversimplify complex causal relationships, thereby undermining the validity of their arguments.

d. Performative Anxiety: A noteworthy counterargument is that the narratives themselves contribute to performative anxiety by amplifying fears and anxieties surrounding the issue. This performative aspect may exacerbate rather than alleviate anxiety among readers.

e. Focus on Privileged Colleges: Critics argue that both narratives predominantly focus on elite, privileged colleges, neglecting the experiences of a significant portion of young college students. This limited scope undermines the universality of their arguments and fails to address the diverse socio-economic backgrounds of college attendees.

Conclusion: In conclusion, while Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" shed light on important aspects of the anxiety epidemic among young adults, a critical assessment reveals various shortcomings in their arguments. Concerns regarding alarmism, reliance on anecdotes, confusion of correlation with causation, performative anxiety, and the focus on privileged colleges challenge the persuasiveness of their narratives. Moving forward, a more nuanced and evidence-based approach is necessary to address the complex issue of anxiety among college students effectively.

Posted at 03:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

Lesson Plan Über Alles

The Challenges, Improvements, Traps, Innovations, and Aspirations of Teaching College Composition

April 2024

04/25/2024

Teach The Road, World War Z, and Pandemic for 1A?

04/18/2024

Revised & Polished Essay Prompts for Fall 2024

Sample Outline:

04/14/2024

New Essay Prompts: Food, Inc. 2, Her and Eternal Sunshine, Lost Cause, Glory, Alex Jones, Kroc, The Graduate, Sunken Place

04/07/2024

Ray Kroc from the Founder as an Essay Option for Cal Newport Essay, English 1A & Comparing The Graduate and Private Life for 1C

04/01/2024

Spring 2024 Safetyism #1

Study Guide for “How Anxiety Became Content” by Derek Thompson

Advertisements

Categories

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Search

Archives

Pinterest

Categories

Categories

Search