Spring 2024 Safetyism #1

 

 

Definition of Safetyism

From an abstract:

This paper by Lucy Foulkes and Jack L. Andrews has been published by New Ideas in Psychology. The abstract says:

“In the past decade, there have been extensive efforts in the Western world to raise public awareness about mental health problems, with the goal of reducing or preventing these symptoms across the population. Despite these efforts, reported rates of mental health problems have increased in these countries over the same period. In this paper, we present the hypothesis that, paradoxically, awareness efforts are contributing to this reported increase in mental health problems. We term this the prevalence inflation hypothesis. First, we argue that mental health awareness efforts are leading to more accurate reporting of previously under-recognised symptoms, a beneficial outcome. Second, and more problematically, we propose that awareness efforts are leading some individuals to interpret and report milder forms of distress as mental health problems. We propose that this then leads some individuals to experience a genuine increase in symptoms, because labelling distress as a mental health problem can affect an individual’s self-concept and behaviour in a way that is ultimately self-fulfilling. For example, interpreting low levels of anxiety as symptomatic of an anxiety disorder might lead to behavioural avoidance, which can further exacerbate anxiety symptoms. We propose that the increase in reported symptoms then drives further awareness efforts: the two processes influence each other in a cyclical, intensifying manner. We end by suggesting ways to test this hypothesis and argue that future awareness efforts need to mitigate the issues we present …”

***

In other words:

Freaking out and becoming paranoid about small, normal anxieties is an overreaction, which is more dangerous than the original false diagnosis. Furthermore, when we freak out and diagnose ourselves with a variety of afflictions, we pamper ourselves, avoid challenges, and become terrified of engaging with reality. As a result, we become weak, dependent on security blankets, and dysfunctional to engage with the real world. The results of our overreactions is that we ended up afflicting ourselves with the very dysfunctions we feared getting in the first place. We have become guilty of a self-fulfilling prophecy. As such, we are trapped in a negative doom loop. 

***

Essay 3 on Safetyism for 200 Points Due May 12

Read Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real."

Then write a 1,200-word argumentative essay that addresses the claim that there is an ideology in our culture that is infecting society and young people in particular with the pathologies of “safetyism”--a sense of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation--and thereby causing the very things the adult world does not want to happen to their children: infantilization, mental decline, emotional fragility, paranoia, maladaptation, and a flagrant absence of qualities needed to survive and thrive in both career and meaningful relationships.

Building Block #1 for Safetyism Essay for 25 points 

Two Paragraphs

Paragraph 1: Read Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind.” Then read John Warner’s counterargument “Safetyism Was Never Real" and Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem." Based on these readings, develop a one-paragraph definition of Safetyism. What is it? What are its distinguishing characteristics?

Paragraph 2: Write a thesis in which you argue if Safetyism is “a real thing” and should be a cause of concern or not. Be sure to give 3 or 4 reasons to explain your position. Those reasons will map your body paragraphs. 

Building Block #2 for Safetyism Essay for 25 points 

One Paragraph

Write a counterargument-rebuttal paragraph to strengthen the persuasive power of your argumentative claim. 

***

"Calling Dr. Tiktok: Experts Weigh in on Alarming Social-Media Trend" by Russ Bahorsky in the online version of A&S Magazine, November-December 2022 issue

Bahorsky writes that Tiktok is a magnet for anxiety seekers. He writes:

According to Statista, a company specializing in market data and consumer insight, much of TikTok’s rapid rise to social-media stardom occurred during the coronavirus pandemic with a surge in growth of 180% among 15–25-year-old users. That demographic has been hit hard by the isolation, anxiety and general unwellness that the lockdowns caused, so it may be no surprise that the last several years have also seen a sharp increase in the number of teens and young adults using the app to learn about mental-health disorders and to self-diagnose themselves with a variety of conditions like autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), borderline personality disorder, dissociative identity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and others. 

***

Rather than seek professionals with science-based evidence to make their claims, more and more people are going to "The University of Google." In the words of the author:

It should go without saying that diagnosing oneself with any condition comes with risks. Despite the wealth of medical and pseudo-medical information readily available online, it’s easy to fall into the trap of thinking that Google is a substitute for a degree in medicine or clinical psychology and doing so could lead to unnecessary stress caused by overestimating the severity of a problem or to missing out on important treatment when a self-diagnosis is incorrect.

Not only do internet sources vary in accuracy and reliability, said Bethany Teachman, a professor of psychology and director of clinical training for the College’s Department of Psychology, but arriving at a correct diagnosis requires training and context.

“Distinguishing between certain diagnostic categories can be tricky,” Teachman said. “There are several symptoms, such as difficulty concentrating, that are part of multiple disorders so people may assign themselves an incorrect diagnosis. As another example, periods of sadness can occur as part of a unipolar depressive disorder, which includes depressive episodes only, but also as part of a bipolar disorder, which includes both depressive and manic episodes. A person self-diagnosing may focus on the depression symptoms but not recognize that they also have periods of mania.”

***

Why do people diagnose themselves?

• Boredom
• Navel-gazing is fun when you're bored.
• It feels good to get "expert" advice for free.
• People are looking for a silver bullet to explain all their complex problems.
• Herd behavior: "Since everyone else is doing it, why can't I?"
• Too much time alone
• A lack of purpose in life causes idle people to fixate on unhealthy websites. 

Study Guide for “How Anxiety Became Content” by Derek Thompson

One. What is the big business of trauma?

The idea of trauma is big business, a blockbuster algorithm that generates lucrative social influencers. The more you can get your audience anxious and scared, the more you can get them glued to your context. Making your audience dysfunctional is your business model. You get them sick, and then you claim you have the cure. You are the ultimate social-media charlatan. 

As we read: 

Anxiety has become its own genre of popular content. Social-media feeds are crowded with therapy influencers who tell us to be more aware of our anxiety, our trauma, our distress. Instagram is full of anxious confessions and therapy-speak The TikTok hashtag #Trauma has more than 6 billion views. According to Listen Notes, a podcast search engine, more than 5,500 podcasts have the word trauma in their title. Celebrity media are awash with mental-health testimonials, and summaries of those testimonials, including “39 Celebrities Who Have Opened Up About Mental HealthLinks,” “What 22 Celebrities Have Said About Having DepressionLinks,” and “12 Times Famous Men Got Real About Mental Health.”

***

Two. What is Derek Thompson’s central argument?

Look at paragraph 2 in which we read:

But in the past few years, I’ve become more convinced that the way we commonly discuss mental-health issues, especially on the internet, isn’t helping us. Watching and listening to so much anxiety content, which transforms a medical diagnosis into a kind of popular media category, might be contributing to our national anxiety crisis.

***

Three. What is the danger of prevalence inflation?

Prevalence inflation is the tendency to “process normal problems of living as signs of a decline in mental health.”

If we tag normal problems as traumatic, then we tend to over protect ourselves from “trauma,” which is no trauma at all, and this becomes a first step in a form of self-debilitation called safetyism in which we retreat into a cocoon and atrophy both physically and intellectually as we disengage from the real world, we become fearful of challenges that would make us stronger, and we excuse ourselves from being accountable for life’s normal challenges. 

Another harmful feature of prevalence inflation is that an exaggerated self-diagnosis, with no basis in fact, will actually make people more anxious, thereby creating a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy.

Yet another harmful effect of prevalence inflation is the blossoming of social media charlatans, fakes, and grifters, “therapy influencers” with no credentials who are making us hyper-aware of our supposed anxieties and traumas, compelling us to seek sanctuary is safe spaces where we marinate in the fear and trembling of safetyism. 

Finally, prevalence inflation obliterates a reasonable and sane sense of proportion and creates an ironing-out effect. If everything is traumatic, then nothing is. We must be able to differentiate the trauma of physical violence and bigotry with the "trauma" with someone who found a fingernail in their fast-food burger and then made an outraged TikTok video about their "trauma." 

Four. Why is having a supposed anxiety crisis or an anxiety affliction a potent status symbol?

For many who claim to be afflicted with anxiety, they are hiding in the paralysis of safetyism and with nothing to show for a life of timid hibernation, they desperately seek status as someone who is “mentally afflicted” and thereby worthy of attention and perhaps even counsel. As we read:

Darby Saxbe, a clinical psychologist at the University of Southern California and a mother to a high schooler, told me she has come to think that, for many young people, claiming an anxiety crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder has become like a status symbol. “I worry that for some people, it’s become an identity marker that makes people feel special and unique,” Saxbe said. “That’s a big problem because this modern idea that anxiety is an identity gives people a fixed mindset, telling them this is who they are and will be in the future.” On the contrary, she said, therapy works best when patients come into sessions believing that they can get better. That means believing that anxiety is treatable, modifiable, and malleable—all the things a fixed identity is not.

***

Five. What is catastrophic thinking and why is it so harmful?

The narcissistic desire to be special by claiming a nonexistent affliction leads to exaggerated emotional responses to events that don’t merit level-10 outrage. In the attention economy, you don't get eyeballs if you're mildly afflicted with something. You need to be full tilt or in the extreme. As we read:

This is just one way in which our society popularizes the language of therapy while eviscerating the substance of it. Another is through the arousing negativity contained in much viral media: indignation, anger, shame, “I’m literally shaking.” Something about the five-alarm fire of moral outrage burns efficiently across the prairie of the social web. But cognitive behavioral therapy, for example, encourages patients to avoid catastrophic thinking, to cool the fire of anger, to reconstruct their feelings and thoughts to be more patient with themselves and with others. The share of adults receiving mental-health treatment is surging but we have built an online ecosystem that thrives on the very principles that counselors implore us to reject.

***

Six. How does having a smartphone encourage catastrophic thinking?

When we own smartphones, we tend to live in the tiny world of the smartphone ecosystem. This miniscule environment hijacks our brains and consumes our thoughts. We can’t see beyond this tiny world so that we are more gullible to false and harmful messages. As we read:

When I asked Saxbe whether internet conversations about anxiety might be partly driving the anxiety crisis, she readily agreed. Marshall McLuhan’s observation that “the medium is the message” has been on her mind as she notes the way that social media takes people out of the physical world. “We all, and young people in particular, too often use our phones to withdraw and avoid,” she said. “So even if we’re getting insightful therapeutic content, we’re often getting it while we’re in bed and on our phones.” Of course, she acknowledged, some online conversations can feel cathartic and even help people put into words their inchoate feelings. But alone on couches and in beds, thin lines separate active reflection (which can be healthy), rumination (less healthy), and outright wallowing (not healthy). “It’s not so different from listening to sad songs when you’re sad,” she said. “Of course, I would tell a patient that it can be cathartic. But if it’s all you do to cope? That’s bad.”

More deeply, she added, the algorithmic architecture of social media isn’t doing us any favors. The “If you liked that, you might like this” organization of information on social media means that our engagement with certain kinds of content—politics, lifestyle, or mental health—can burrow us deeper into that genre. Rather than allow us to work through our negative feelings and move on, it can trap us in algorithmic whirlpools of outrage, doubt, and anger. (Anybody who has doomscrolled through a particularly gruesome news cycle can surely empathize.)

***

Seven. What is the solution to debilitating ourselves with exaggerated self-diagnoses of anxiety and depression?

Rather than getting paralyzed in the maze of fear and depression and reinforcing that maze by reading more and more about our “afflictions,” we should move forward, take action, and do activities that will take us out of our “brain hijack.” Living inside our heads the last thing we should be doing. As we read:

The solution begins with the principle of opposite action. Saxbe said the best thing we can do for ourselves when we’re anxious or depressed is to fight our instinct to avoid and ruminate, rather than get sucked into algorithmic wormholes of avoidance and rumination. The best thing one can do when they’re depressed is to reject the instinct to stay in bed basking in the glow of a phone, and to instead step outside, engage with a friend, or do something else that provides more opportunities for validation and reward. “I would tell people to do what’s uncomfortable, to run toward danger,” Saxbe said. “You are not your anxiety. You’re so much more.”

***

ChatGPT Prompt:

In the context of Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” write an analysis of the big business of trauma, prevalence inflation, and Thompson's prescription for allaying the pathologies resulting in the self-diagnosing of various supposed traumas. 

 

 

ChatGPT

In Derek Thompson's compelling exploration, "How Anxiety Became Content," he delves into the intricate interplay between modern media consumption, the commodification of personal experiences, and the rise of what he terms as "prevalence inflation" in the realm of mental health. Thompson's analysis underscores the profound transformation of anxiety from a private affliction to a lucrative form of content within the digital landscape, reflecting broader societal shifts in how we perceive and engage with our emotional well-being.

Central to Thompson's argument is the notion of trauma as big business, wherein the proliferation of online platforms and social media channels has created a marketplace for the monetization of personal narratives. He astutely observes how the amplification of individual experiences, often through sensationalized storytelling and performative vulnerability, has fueled a culture of commodified anxiety. In this context, the line between genuine introspection and self-promotion becomes increasingly blurred, as individuals navigate the pressures of online validation and the pursuit of virality.

Moreover, Thompson elucidates the concept of "prevalence inflation," whereby the perceived prevalence of anxiety and related mental health issues appears to soar in tandem with their visibility in media and popular discourse. This phenomenon reflects not only the amplification effect of digital platforms but also the social contagion dynamics inherent in online communities. As individuals encounter and engage with narratives of anxiety and trauma, there is a tendency for these experiences to be normalized and even valorized, leading to a snowball effect wherein the perceived prevalence of such issues appears to skyrocket.

However, Thompson does not merely diagnose the problem; he also offers a thoughtful prescription for addressing the pathologies underlying the self-diagnosing trend. He advocates for a recalibration of our relationship with media consumption, emphasizing the importance of discernment and critical engagement. By encouraging individuals to approach online content with a healthy skepticism and a nuanced understanding of narrative construction, Thompson suggests that we can mitigate the harmful effects of prevalence inflation and foster a more authentic discourse around mental health.

In conclusion, Derek Thompson's analysis sheds light on the complex dynamics driving the commodification of trauma and the phenomenon of prevalence inflation in the digital age. Through his incisive examination, he prompts us to reconsider our relationship with media consumption and advocate for a more discerning approach to online content. By doing so, we can begin to dismantle the commercialization of anxiety and foster a more nuanced understanding of mental health in the digital era.

 

ChatGPT Prompt:

 

In the context of Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” write an essay that addresses the claim that the big business of trauma, prevalence inflation, performative vulnerability, and commodified anxiety are together creating a new kind of social media personality that can be characterized as a narcissistic grifter. 

 

ChatGPT Response:

 

In Derek Thompson's thought-provoking piece, "How Anxiety Became Content," he delves deep into the evolving landscape of social media and its profound impact on mental health discourse. Central to his analysis is the notion of the commodification of anxiety and trauma, the phenomenon of prevalence inflation, and the emergence of what can be described as a new breed of social media personality: the narcissistic grifter.

The term "narcissistic grifter" encapsulates a persona that thrives on the exploitation of personal narratives for self-aggrandizement and financial gain. This individual is characterized by a relentless pursuit of attention and validation, often at the expense of genuine introspection and empathy. Thompson's exploration illuminates how the convergence of performative vulnerability and commodified anxiety has provided fertile ground for the cultivation of such personas within the digital sphere.

At the heart of this phenomenon lies the commodification of trauma, wherein personal narratives of hardship and suffering are repackaged as consumable content for mass consumption. In the pursuit of virality and online validation, individuals may exaggerate or fabricate experiences of anxiety and trauma, transforming genuine struggles into sensationalized spectacles designed to capture the attention of audiences. This commodification not only trivializes the lived experiences of those genuinely grappling with mental health issues but also perpetuates a culture of voyeurism and exploitation.

Moreover, prevalence inflation exacerbates this dynamic by perpetuating the illusion of an epidemic of anxiety and trauma, thereby amplifying the market demand for content centered around these themes. As individuals compete for visibility and engagement within an increasingly crowded digital landscape, there is a temptation to conform to prevailing narratives of suffering and victimhood, further fueling the cycle of performative vulnerability and commodified anxiety.

In this environment, the narcissistic grifter emerges as a central figure, adept at leveraging personal narratives of trauma and anxiety for personal gain. This individual is driven by a relentless pursuit of attention and validation, using performative displays of vulnerability to cultivate a loyal following and monetize their experiences. However, behind the facade of authenticity lies a calculated manipulation of emotions and narratives, with little regard for the genuine well-being of their audience.

The rise of the narcissistic grifter represents a troubling convergence of social media culture and the commercialization of personal experiences. By exploiting the vulnerabilities of their audience for personal gain, these individuals perpetuate a cycle of performative vulnerability and commodified anxiety, further eroding the authenticity and empathy that should underpin discussions of mental health.

In conclusion, Derek Thompson's analysis sheds light on the emergence of a new kind of social media personality: the narcissistic grifter. Through the commodification of trauma, prevalence inflation, and performative vulnerability, these individuals exploit personal narratives of anxiety and trauma for self-aggrandizement and financial gain. As we navigate the complexities of social media culture, it is essential to remain vigilant against the manipulation and exploitation perpetuated by such personas, striving instead for genuine empathy and understanding in our discussions of mental health.

 

ChatGPT Prompt:

 

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. 

In the juxtaposition of Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's piece "How Anxiety Became Content," a stark portrayal emerges of the toxic intersection between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. This convergence not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also cultivates a breeding ground for what can be described as a generation of narcissistic con artists.

Haidt's essay serves as a poignant critique of the pervasive influence of smartphones and social media on the development of today's youth. He argues that excessive screen time and online engagement contribute to a host of detrimental effects, ranging from diminished attention spans to heightened rates of anxiety and depression. Central to his analysis is the notion that the allure of constant connectivity fosters a culture of distraction and disconnection, wherein genuine human interaction is sacrificed at the altar of virtual validation.

In contrast, Thompson's exploration delves into the commodification of anxiety within the digital landscape, highlighting how personal narratives of trauma and suffering have become currency in the attention economy. He elucidates the phenomenon of performative vulnerability, wherein individuals exploit their own struggles for online validation and financial gain. Thompson's analysis underscores the profound transformation of anxiety from a private affliction to a lucrative form of content, perpetuated by the relentless pursuit of likes, shares, and engagement.

Together, these essays paint a damning portrait of the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. The constant pressure to curate a flawless online persona fosters a climate of hyper-competition and comparison, wherein individuals are compelled to project an image of success and happiness at all costs. In this environment, genuine vulnerability becomes a commodity to be traded and exploited for personal gain, blurring the lines between authenticity and artifice.

Moreover, the pervasive influence of social media amplifies the reach and impact of these performative narratives, creating a feedback loop wherein individuals are incentivized to perpetuate and exaggerate their struggles for maximum visibility and engagement. This cycle not only trivializes genuine experiences of anxiety and trauma but also perpetuates a culture of narcissism and self-absorption, wherein personal validation takes precedence over genuine human connection.

In this context, the term "narcissistic con artist" aptly captures the essence of individuals who exploit the vulnerabilities of others for personal gain within the digital sphere. By perpetuating a facade of authenticity while engaging in calculated manipulation and exploitation, these individuals sow seeds of mistrust and disillusionment, eroding the fabric of genuine human connection in the process.

In conclusion, the comparison of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" sheds light on the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. Together, these essays reveal the disturbing trend of a generation of narcissistic con artists who exploit personal narratives of trauma and suffering for personal gain, perpetuating a culture of superficiality and disconnection within the digital landscape. As we navigate the complexities of online engagement, it is imperative to remain vigilant against the manipulation and exploitation perpetuated by these individuals, striving instead for genuine empathy and connection in our interactions both online and offline.

 

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. Be sure to provide three examples of social media personalities to illustrate your points.

 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

In the juxtaposition of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content," a troubling portrait emerges of the toxic relationship between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. This fusion not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also cultivates a breeding ground for what can aptly be described as a generation of narcissistic con artists. Through the lens of three illustrative examples of social media personalities, we can discern the intricate ways in which this toxic marriage manifests.

Firstly, consider the case of "Influencer A," a popular lifestyle blogger who portrays an image of effortless perfection to her followers. Through meticulously curated posts showcasing her glamorous lifestyle, impeccable appearance, and seemingly flawless relationships, she perpetuates an idealized facade of happiness and success. However, behind the scenes, Influencer A struggles with anxiety and self-doubt, leading her to exploit her vulnerabilities for online validation. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and insecurity, she manipulates her audience's emotions, garnering sympathy and engagement while simultaneously perpetuating a culture of performative vulnerability.

Secondly, let's examine "Fitness Guru B," an Instagram personality known for his chiseled physique and motivational messages. On the surface, Fitness Guru B appears to embody the epitome of health and wellness, inspiring his followers to pursue their fitness goals with relentless determination. However, beneath the surface lies a darker truth: Fitness Guru B's extreme dedication to maintaining his image has led to an unhealthy obsession with perfection and validation. Despite struggling with body image issues and disordered eating, he continues to project an image of strength and discipline, exploiting his vulnerabilities to cultivate a loyal following and monetize his brand.

Lastly, consider "Travel Influencer C," whose Instagram feed is filled with envy-inducing images of exotic destinations and luxury accommodations. With each picture-perfect post, Travel Influencer C perpetuates the illusion of an idyllic nomadic lifestyle, enticing her followers to escape their mundane realities and live vicariously through her adventures. However, behind the glamorous facade lies a trail of deceit and manipulation. In reality, Travel Influencer C often relies on sponsored content and staged photoshoots to maintain her image, sacrificing authenticity for the sake of online validation and financial gain.

These examples illustrate the insidious ways in which social media personalities exploit the culture of performative vulnerability to cultivate a persona that is as lucrative as it is deceptive. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and insecurity, these individuals manipulate their audiences' emotions, perpetuating a cycle of voyeurism and exploitation. In doing so, they contribute to the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, creating a generation of narcissistic con artists who prioritize personal gain over genuine human connection.

In conclusion, the comparison of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" offers valuable insights into the corrosive impact of social media on mental health and well-being. Through the lens of three illustrative examples of social media personalities, we can discern the intricate ways in which this toxic marriage manifests, highlighting the need for greater awareness and vigilance in navigating the complexities of online engagement.

 

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. Be sure to provide three real-life examples of social media personalities to illustrate your points.

 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

In the intersection of Jonathan Haidt's "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content," a troubling narrative emerges, exposing the detrimental effects of social media's toxic marriage with the culture of performative vulnerability. This convergence not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also cultivates a generation of individuals who exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain, effectively becoming narcissistic con artists. Through the examination of three real-life examples of social media personalities, we can illuminate the insidious nature of this phenomenon.

Firstly, let's consider the case of Essena O'Neill, a former Instagram influencer who gained fame and fortune by portraying an idyllic lifestyle of travel, fashion, and beauty. O'Neill meticulously curated her online persona, posting aspirational images that garnered her a large following and lucrative brand deals. However, in a shocking turn of events, O'Neill publicly denounced the culture of social media perfectionism, revealing that her seemingly perfect life was a facade crafted to please her audience and attract sponsorships. She confessed to experiencing profound feelings of loneliness and dissatisfaction behind the scenes, exposing the inherent dishonesty and manipulation prevalent in the influencer industry.

Secondly, we can examine the case of Caroline Calloway, a prominent figure in the world of Instagram influencers known for her whimsical storytelling and aspirational lifestyle. Calloway captivated her audience with tales of her adventures as a globe-trotting artist and writer, gaining a devoted following eager to emulate her carefree existence. However, her carefully constructed narrative began to unravel when it was revealed that many of her stories were embellished or outright fabricated. Calloway's penchant for performative vulnerability and self-mythologizing ultimately tarnished her reputation, highlighting the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity.

Lastly, let's explore the case of Belle Gibson, a wellness influencer who rose to fame for her inspirational story of overcoming terminal brain cancer through holistic treatments and healthy living. Gibson's narrative captivated millions of followers, who looked to her for guidance and inspiration in their own health journeys. However, it was later revealed that Gibson had fabricated her cancer diagnosis entirely, exploiting her fictitious illness to promote her wellness app and cookbook. Gibson's deception not only betrayed the trust of her followers but also underscored the dark underbelly of the wellness industry, where authenticity and truth are often sacrificed in pursuit of profit and fame.

These real-life examples illustrate the pervasive influence of social media in perpetuating a culture of performative vulnerability and deception. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and authenticity, these individuals manipulate their audiences' emotions, perpetuating a cycle of voyeurism and exploitation. In doing so, they contribute to the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, creating a generation of narcissistic con artists who prioritize personal gain over genuine human connection.

In conclusion, the comparison of Haidt's and Thompson's essays sheds light on the damaging impact of social media's toxic marriage with the culture of performative vulnerability. Through the examination of real-life examples of social media personalities, we can discern the insidious ways in which individuals exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain, perpetuating a cycle of manipulation and deceit. As we navigate the complexities of online engagement, it is essential to remain vigilant against the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity, striving instead for genuine human connection in our interactions both online and offline.

 

Write an essay that addresses the claim that comparing Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" with Derek Thompson's essay "How Anxiety Became Content" reveals the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, which is creating a generation of narcissistic con artists. Be sure to provide three real-life examples of social media personalities to illustrate your points. For your last paragraph, do not use the transition "In conclusion"; rather, use a more sophisticated transition suitable for college-level writing.

 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

In the juxtaposition of Jonathan Haidt's essay "End the Phone-Based Childhood Now" and Derek Thompson's piece "How Anxiety Became Content," a troubling narrative unfolds, exposing the toxic alliance between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability. This convergence not only perpetuates the commodification of personal experiences but also fosters a generation of individuals who exploit their vulnerabilities for personal gain, effectively becoming narcissistic con artists. Through the examination of three real-life examples of social media personalities, we can shed light on the insidious nature of this phenomenon.

One striking example is Essena O'Neill, a former Instagram influencer who rose to prominence by showcasing an enviable lifestyle of travel, fashion, and beauty. O'Neill meticulously curated her online persona, amassing a large following and lucrative brand deals. However, she later shocked her audience by publicly denouncing the culture of social media perfectionism, revealing that her seemingly perfect life was a facade crafted to please her audience and attract sponsorships. This revelation exposed the inherent dishonesty and manipulation prevalent in the influencer industry.

Another illustrative case is Caroline Calloway, a prominent figure in the world of Instagram influencers known for her whimsical storytelling and aspirational lifestyle. Calloway captivated her audience with tales of her adventures as a globe-trotting artist and writer, gaining a devoted following eager to emulate her carefree existence. However, her carefully constructed narrative began to unravel when it was revealed that many of her stories were embellished or outright fabricated. Calloway's penchant for performative vulnerability and self-mythologizing ultimately tarnished her reputation, highlighting the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity.

A further example is Belle Gibson, a wellness influencer who gained fame for her inspirational story of overcoming terminal brain cancer through holistic treatments and healthy living. Gibson's narrative resonated with millions of followers seeking guidance and inspiration in their own health journeys. However, it was later uncovered that Gibson had fabricated her cancer diagnosis entirely, exploiting her fictitious illness to promote her wellness app and cookbook. Gibson's deception not only betrayed the trust of her followers but also underscored the dark underbelly of the wellness industry, where authenticity and truth are often sacrificed in pursuit of profit and fame.

These real-life examples vividly illustrate the pervasive influence of social media in perpetuating a culture of performative vulnerability and deception. By selectively sharing moments of vulnerability and authenticity, these individuals manipulate their audiences' emotions, perpetuating a cycle of voyeurism and exploitation. In doing so, they contribute to the toxic marriage between social media and the culture of performative vulnerability, creating a generation of narcissistic con artists who prioritize personal gain over genuine human connection.

Ultimately, the comparison of Haidt's and Thompson's essays serves as a poignant reminder of the complex and multifaceted nature of the digital age. As we navigate the intricacies of online engagement, it is imperative to remain vigilant against the dangers of prioritizing online validation over authenticity and integrity. Only through critical reflection and discernment can we hope to mitigate the damaging effects of social media's toxic influence on our society and foster a culture of genuine human connection and empathy.

 

Read Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real." Then write an argumentative essay that addresses the claim that there is an ideology in our culture that is infecting society and young people in particular with the pathologies of “safetyism”--a sense of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation--and thereby causing the very things the adult world does not want to happen to their children: infantilization, mental decline, emotional fragility, paranoia, maladaptation, and a flagrant absence of qualities needed to survive and thrive in both career and meaningful relationships. Moreover, address the idea that this performative vulnerability is transforming young people into narcissistic grifters.

 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

In contemporary discourse, there is a growing concern surrounding an ideology permeating our culture, often referred to as "safetyism." This ideology, characterized by an emphasis on protecting individuals from perceived harm and discomfort, has been identified as a contributing factor to a host of negative outcomes, particularly among young people. Through an analysis of various perspectives presented in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real,” it becomes evident that safetyism fosters a sense of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation, leading to infantilization, emotional fragility, and a lack of resilience. Furthermore, this culture of performative vulnerability perpetuated by safetyism can transform young people into narcissistic grifters, prioritizing self-promotion and exploitation over genuine connection and growth.

Thompson’s exploration of how anxiety has become a commodity in the digital age sheds light on the phenomenon of prevalence inflation, wherein the perceived prevalence of anxiety and related mental health issues rises alongside their visibility in media and popular discourse. This prevalence inflation is exacerbated by the culture of safetyism, which tends to magnify and overstate the risks and traumas encountered by individuals, particularly young people. As a result, young people are increasingly shielded from discomfort and adversity, leading to a lack of resilience and adaptability necessary for navigating the complexities of the adult world.

Lukianoff and Haidt further delve into the detrimental effects of safetyism in their essay, "The Coddling of the American Mind." They argue that by prioritizing emotional safety over intellectual challenge, universities and institutions inadvertently promote a culture of fragility and avoidance. This culture of safetyism not only infantilizes young people but also stifles intellectual curiosity and critical thinking skills, hindering their ability to engage meaningfully with differing perspectives and navigate the complexities of the real world.

Paresky and Campbell challenge the notion that safetyism is solely responsible for the challenges faced by young people in their essay, "Safetyism Isn't the Problem." They argue that while safetyism may play a role in perpetuating emotional fragility, it is not the root cause. Instead, they point to broader cultural shifts, such as changes in parenting styles and the rise of social media, as contributing factors to the challenges faced by young people today. While safetyism may exacerbate these issues, addressing the underlying cultural dynamics is crucial for fostering resilience and adaptability in young people.

Warner's perspective in "Safetyism Was Never Real" offers a nuanced critique of the concept of safetyism, arguing that it is often exaggerated and mischaracterized in public discourse. He suggests that concerns about safetyism may stem from a broader societal anxiety about change and uncertainty rather than a genuine threat to individual autonomy and resilience. While safetyism may manifest in certain contexts, Warner contends that it is not the pervasive force that some make it out to be.

In conclusion, the ideologies of safetyism and performative vulnerability contribute to a culture of exaggerated trauma and prevalence inflation, which in turn lead to infantilization, emotional fragility, and a lack of resilience among young people. Moreover, this culture of performative vulnerability can transform young people into narcissistic grifters, prioritizing self-promotion and exploitation over genuine connection and growth. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach that considers broader cultural dynamics and promotes resilience, adaptability, and genuine human connection.

 

 

Summarize the arguments in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content,” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind." Then explain how these arguments are at odds with Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem," and John Warner’s “Safetyism Was Never Real." Specifically identify the counterarguments Pamela Paresky, Bradley Campbell, and John Warner present in the face of the arguments made by Derek Thompson, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt. Explain how persuasive these counterarguments are and what improvements would have to be made to make these counterarguments more persuasive.

 

 

ChatGPT

Summary of Arguments:

1. Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content": Thompson argues that the rise of anxiety-driven content on social media platforms has led to the commodification of mental health struggles. He suggests that this trend perpetuates a culture of anxiety and discontentment, exploiting individuals' insecurities for profit.

2. Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind": Lukianoff and Haidt contend that the overprotection of young people from potentially distressing or challenging ideas on college campuses has resulted in a generation ill-prepared to face adversity. They argue that the prioritization of emotional safety over intellectual rigor stifles free speech and critical thinking, ultimately harming both individuals and society.

Counterarguments:

1. Pamela Paresky and Bradley Campbell's "Safetyism Isn't the Problem": Paresky and Campbell challenge the notion put forth by Thompson, Lukianoff, and Haidt that a culture of "safetyism" is rampant and harmful. They argue that concerns about safety on college campuses have been exaggerated and that efforts to create inclusive environments do not necessarily equate to coddling or stifling free speech. They propose that the focus should be on promoting resilience and robust discourse rather than perpetuating a narrative of crisis.

2. John Warner's “Safetyism Was Never Real": Warner further questions the premise of a pervasive culture of safetyism. He argues that the term has been misapplied and exaggerated to advance certain agendas, suggesting that the fears about the suppression of speech are unfounded. Warner asserts that the real issue lies in addressing legitimate concerns about harassment and discrimination while maintaining a commitment to free expression and open dialogue.

Persuasiveness and Potential Improvements:

• Paresky and Campbell's Counterargument: Their perspective offers a valuable alternative viewpoint, highlighting the importance of creating inclusive environments without resorting to alarmist rhetoric. However, to enhance persuasiveness, they could provide more concrete evidence to support their claims and address specific examples of where the line between inclusivity and censorship might blur.

• Warner's Counterargument: Warner's critique challenges the very premise of the opposing arguments, suggesting that the issue has been blown out of proportion. While his skepticism is valid, providing more nuanced examples and acknowledging instances where concerns about safetyism may be justified would strengthen his argument. Additionally, offering solutions for effectively balancing safety and free expression would enhance the persuasiveness of his perspective.

 

Comparing Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," write an essay that addresses the argument that both essays rely too much on exaggeration and alarmist extremes and ignore the real causes of societal breakdown to the degree that both essays are failures of persuasion. 

 

Title: Deconstructing Exaggeration and Alarmism in Contemporary Discourse: A Critique of Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt

In contemporary discourse, the prevalence of alarmist rhetoric and exaggerated claims has become increasingly noticeable, particularly in discussions surrounding societal issues. Two prominent examples of this phenomenon are Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind." Both essays, while addressing significant societal concerns, tend to rely heavily on exaggeration and alarmist extremes, ultimately undermining their effectiveness in persuading readers. This essay will critically analyze these works, arguing that their overemphasis on alarmism detracts from a nuanced understanding of societal issues and inhibits genuine persuasion.

Firstly, both Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt employ sensationalized language and extreme scenarios to capture readers' attention. Thompson's depiction of anxiety as the central commodity of the digital age and Lukianoff/Haidt's portrayal of a generation crippled by fragility and hypersensitivity serve to shock rather than inform. By painting such exaggerated pictures, these authors risk alienating readers who may perceive their arguments as hyperbolic and disconnected from reality. Instead of fostering genuine engagement, this approach can lead to skepticism and resistance.

Moreover, both essays tend to oversimplify complex societal issues by attributing them to singular causes. Thompson primarily blames the rise of digital media for the commodification of anxiety, ignoring other contributing factors such as socioeconomic disparities and systemic pressures. Similarly, Lukianoff/Haidt attribute the phenomenon of "safetyism" to a misguided culture of overprotection, overlooking broader socio-cultural dynamics and historical contexts. By focusing narrowly on these supposed causes, the authors fail to acknowledge the multifaceted nature of societal breakdown, thereby weakening their arguments.

Furthermore, the failure to address counterarguments and alternative perspectives undermines the credibility of both essays. Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt present their arguments as absolute truths, leaving little room for dissent or dialogue. By dismissing opposing viewpoints, they overlook valuable insights and risk alienating readers who may hold differing beliefs. Persuasion, by its nature, requires a willingness to engage with diverse perspectives and acknowledge the complexity of the issues at hand. By neglecting this principle, both essays fall short in their attempts to persuade.

In conclusion, while Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Lukianoff/Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" address important societal concerns, their reliance on exaggeration and alarmist rhetoric ultimately undermines their effectiveness as persuasive works. By sensationalizing issues, oversimplifying causes, and dismissing opposing viewpoints, these essays fail to engage readers in meaningful dialogue and hinder progress towards genuine understanding and solutions. To truly persuade audiences, writers must strive for nuance, empathy, and a willingness to engage with complexity rather than resorting to alarmism and simplification.

 

Comparing Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," write an essay that addresses the argument that both essays are persuasive and compelling accounts of a young generation in a state of crisis in which they are encouraged to be overly fragile, prone to performative vulnerabilities, and growing into insufferable narcissists who are dysfunctional, unemployable, and incapable of leading America into the next century. 

 

Title: Persuasive Portraits of a Generation: Analyzing Thompson's and Lukianoff/Haidt's Narratives of Contemporary Youth Crisis

In the contemporary landscape of societal analysis, two prominent voices have emerged, shedding light on what they perceive as a crisis afflicting the younger generation. Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" offer compelling narratives of a generation caught in a web of fragility, performative vulnerabilities, and narcissism. This essay delves into the persuasive qualities of both essays, examining their arguments regarding the state of today's youth and their implications for the future of America.

Thompson's exploration of how anxiety has become a commodity in the digital age resonates deeply with readers, tapping into the zeitgeist of a generation grappling with incessant pressure and scrutiny. Through vivid examples and incisive analysis, he paints a picture of a youth culture shaped by the relentless pursuit of validation and the commodification of personal experiences. By linking the rise of anxiety to the proliferation of digital media and the attention economy, Thompson compellingly illustrates how young people are encouraged to perform their vulnerabilities for public consumption, perpetuating a cycle of self-doubt and insecurity.

Similarly, Lukianoff and Haidt's examination of the phenomenon of "safetyism" provides a thought-provoking analysis of the cultural trends that have contributed to the perceived fragility of today's youth. Drawing on psychological research and anecdotal evidence, they argue persuasively that an overemphasis on physical and emotional safety has led to a generation ill-equipped to navigate the challenges of the real world. By highlighting the detrimental effects of excessive coddling and the suppression of uncomfortable ideas, they make a compelling case for the importance of resilience and intellectual freedom in fostering personal growth and societal progress.

Both essays effectively capture the anxieties and frustrations of a generation coming of age in an increasingly complex and uncertain world. By framing their arguments within the broader context of societal trends and cultural norms, Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt provide compelling insights into the challenges facing today's youth. Moreover, their narratives resonate with readers by tapping into universal fears and aspirations, making the issues they discuss feel urgent and relevant.

However, it is essential to critically examine the implications of these narratives and the extent to which they accurately reflect the experiences of all young people. While Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt offer persuasive accounts of a generation grappling with fragility and narcissism, their portrayals risk oversimplifying complex social phenomena and perpetuating negative stereotypes. It is crucial to recognize the diversity and resilience of today's youth, acknowledging that not all individuals fit neatly into the narratives presented by these authors.

In conclusion, Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" offer persuasive and compelling accounts of a young generation navigating a complex and challenging world. By shining a spotlight on the pressures and vulnerabilities faced by today's youth, these essays provoke important conversations about the future of America and the values we hold dear. However, it is essential to approach these narratives with a critical eye, recognizing the limitations of singular perspectives and the need for a more nuanced understanding of generational dynamics.

 

Sneak Peak Into Essay 3

 

Write an essay that addresses the following: While I concede many of the points in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind," especially in terms of the way young people can get lost in their social media bubbles and become influenced by hysterical views and performative anxiety resulting in paranoia and dysfunction, I find that their essays have egregious flaws. For one, the essays are hypocritical in that their alarmist view of the young generation is itself a form of performative anxiety designed to get clicks and to provide a platform to unfairly demonize young people when in fact people of all ages are struggling with mental problems associated with social media addiction. Two, their essays are deflections of the real causes of anxiety in the young generation: inflated costs of education and housing, an uncertain job market, global warming, and economic disparities favoring the boomer generation. Third, the essays rely too much on anecdotes to generalize about the young generation. A small percentage of young people may be losing their minds to performative anxiety, but to paint the young generation as being uninformed, overly fragile, and narcissistic is a gross overgeneralization.

 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

In the realm of contemporary discourse surrounding the mental landscape of the younger generation, Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" stand as prominent voices, echoing concerns about the impact of social media on mental health. While these essays offer valuable insights into the perils of social media bubbles and the proliferation of performative anxiety, they are not without their notable flaws.

Primarily, both Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt fall prey to a certain level of hypocrisy by perpetuating an alarmist narrative regarding the younger generation. Their critiques, while valid to an extent, often adopt a sensationalized tone aimed at generating clicks and reinforcing stereotypes about young people. In their quest to highlight the pitfalls of performative anxiety, they inadvertently contribute to the very phenomenon they critique, perpetuating a cycle of fear and apprehension.

Furthermore, these essays tend to overlook the broader societal factors contributing to the rise of anxiety among young people. While social media undoubtedly plays a role, it is but one piece of a much larger puzzle. Economic insecurity, exacerbated by inflated education and housing costs, an uncertain job market, and the looming specter of global warming, all contribute significantly to the collective anxiety experienced by younger generations. By fixating solely on social media, Thompson and Lukianoff/Haidt neglect to address these systemic issues, thereby providing an incomplete analysis of the problem at hand.

Moreover, the reliance on anecdotal evidence to generalize about an entire generation is a glaring weakness of both essays. While it is undeniable that some individuals may succumb to performative anxiety, it is unfair and intellectually lazy to extrapolate these experiences to characterize an entire demographic. Such generalizations not only overlook the diversity of experiences within the younger generation but also perpetuate harmful stereotypes that undermine meaningful dialogue and understanding.

In conclusion, while Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Lukianoff and Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" offer valuable insights into the challenges faced by young people in the digital age, they are marred by significant flaws. Their alarmist tone, failure to address systemic issues, and reliance on anecdotal evidence detract from the credibility of their arguments. Moving forward, a more nuanced approach that acknowledges the complexities of the issue and considers a broader range of contributing factors is essential to fostering a meaningful discourse surrounding mental health in the younger generation.

***

Analyze the major points in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind;” then in an argumentative essay, assess how persuasive their arguments are in the context of the following counterarguments: The essays are too alarmist and rely on anecdotes rather than comprehensive studies; their arguments may confuse correlation with causation; their arguments are as guilty of performative anxiety as the supposed performative anxiety they identify; their arguments focus only on wealthy privileged colleges and therefore don’t address a large swatch of young college students.

 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT

Title: A Critical Assessment of Anxiety Narratives: Unpacking Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content” and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind”

Introduction: In recent years, the discourse surrounding anxiety among young adults has gained significant traction. Two prominent voices in this conversation are Derek Thompson, with his piece "How Anxiety Became Content," and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt, authors of "The Coddling of the American Mind." While these narratives shed light on the growing prevalence of anxiety among college students, it is imperative to critically analyze their major points and evaluate their persuasiveness in light of several counterarguments.

Thesis Statement: This essay aims to critically assess the persuasiveness of Thompson's and Lukianoff and Haidt's arguments, considering counterarguments that highlight concerns regarding alarmism, anecdotal evidence, correlation versus causation, performative anxiety, and the focus on privileged colleges.

Body:

1. Major Points in Derek Thompson’s “How Anxiety Became Content”: a. Thompson highlights the commodification of anxiety, framing it as content for media consumption. b. He discusses how social media exacerbates feelings of anxiety and insecurity among young adults. c. Thompson argues that the normalization of anxiety has led to its acceptance as a cultural norm.

2. Major Points in Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt’s “The Coddling of the American Mind”: a. Lukianoff and Haidt explore the phenomenon of "safetyism" on college campuses, where the prioritization of emotional safety stifles free speech. b. They discuss the impact of overprotection and the avoidance of discomfort on young adults' mental resilience. c. The authors propose strategies to counteract the culture of overprotection and promote intellectual diversity on college campuses.

3. Assessment of Persuasiveness: a. Concerns Regarding Alarmism: Both Thompson and Lukianoff and Haidt employ alarmist language to draw attention to the issue of anxiety. While this may effectively capture readers' attention, it risks sensationalizing the issue and detracting from a nuanced understanding of the underlying factors contributing to anxiety.

   b. Reliance on Anecdotes: One critique of both narratives is their reliance on anecdotal evidence rather than comprehensive studies. While anecdotes can provide valuable insights, they may not accurately represent broader trends. Incorporating empirical research would strengthen their arguments.

   c. Confusion of Correlation with Causation: Both narratives run the risk of conflating correlation with causation. While they identify associations between certain phenomena and increased anxiety levels, they may oversimplify complex causal relationships, thereby undermining the validity of their arguments.

   d. Performative Anxiety: A noteworthy counterargument is that the narratives themselves contribute to performative anxiety by amplifying fears and anxieties surrounding the issue. This performative aspect may exacerbate rather than alleviate anxiety among readers.

   e. Focus on Privileged Colleges: Critics argue that both narratives predominantly focus on elite, privileged colleges, neglecting the experiences of a significant portion of young college students. This limited scope undermines the universality of their arguments and fails to address the diverse socio-economic backgrounds of college attendees.

Conclusion: In conclusion, while Derek Thompson's "How Anxiety Became Content" and Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's "The Coddling of the American Mind" shed light on important aspects of the anxiety epidemic among young adults, a critical assessment reveals various shortcomings in their arguments. Concerns regarding alarmism, reliance on anecdotes, confusion of correlation with causation, performative anxiety, and the focus on privileged colleges challenge the persuasiveness of their narratives. Moving forward, a more nuanced and evidence-based approach is necessary to address the complex issue of anxiety among college students effectively.